18.12.2012 Views

Introduction

Introduction

Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

166<br />

Sabina Fazli<br />

wrong suspects are continental secret societies and German revolutionaries who<br />

hide out in London (Doyle, Scarlet 33). Major Sholto and Thaddeus Sholto, although<br />

not directly bound by the pact of “the Four”, still break their promise and<br />

are consequently sought out by Small. Thus Thaddeus Sholto sees “secret agencies<br />

at work all around us” (Sign 147) and assumes the same omnipresent and deceptive<br />

plot as in The Moonstone. Both texts, however, assume different attitudes towards<br />

the secretive pacts. The opacity of the Brahmins’ dealings juxtaposes<br />

Small’s complete confession of the conspirators’ deeds so that The Sign of Four<br />

presents a conspiracy that is finally unravelled. The diamonds instigate these conspiracies<br />

and function as the bond which draws the alien characters to England.<br />

They are associated with the obscure, criminal invasive.<br />

The ‘Close’ Other<br />

The Eustace Diamonds: Harter, Benjamin and Emilius<br />

The mysterious Indians who follow the Moonstone and who are perceived as a<br />

threat to Rachel have somewhat less sensational counterparts in The Eustace Diamonds.<br />

The firm of Harter and Benjamin, Jewish moneylenders and jewellers, is<br />

responsible for the two burglaries to steal Lizzie’s diamonds, one attempted and<br />

the other successful. As Jews they represent a version of the ‘close’ Other, alongside<br />

the racial hybrid as represented in Ezra Jennings.<br />

The stereotypical depiction of Jews in nineteenth-century realist literature<br />

shifts from the mythical arch-villain to the economic criminal. His relation to the<br />

rest of society is structured by his economic activity and his exaggerated embracing<br />

of capitalism and casts him as a new threat to the established and especially to<br />

the landed society. This stereotype is backed by the much older stereotype of Jews<br />

as usurers (Schuhmacher 44-45).<br />

In The Eustace Diamonds, Benjamin and Harter are from the beginning introduced<br />

as shady and dishonest, as they knowingly accept Lizzie’s lies about her age<br />

and upcoming marriage and agree to support her scheme of letting Sir Florian pay<br />

her debts after their marriage (Trollope 40-41; 46). Mr. Benjamin’s desire for the<br />

Eustace Diamonds surfaces very early on when Lizzie presumes that “if Mr. Benjamin<br />

got them into his hands, Mr Benjamin might perhaps not return them” (79),<br />

and “she was wise enough to know that […] Harter and Benjamin were not trustworthy”<br />

(80), that they were not “as firm as rocks” (80). Respectability and honesty<br />

described as adamant firmness are also attributed to Lucy but not to Lizzie,<br />

who knows that she is “paste” (628).<br />

According to Lord George, who is in debt to Benjamin, he has “’that greasy,<br />

Israelitish smile’” (494). Harter and Benjamin are immediately suspected by the<br />

police to have stolen the diamonds (474): “That there was nothing ‘too hot or too<br />

heavy’ for Messrs. Harter and Benjamin was quite a creed with the police of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!