Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...
Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...
Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
of the European pig (Schomburgk 1923: 310). Im Thurn reported that the meat of<br />
exotic animals introduced by Europeans was avoided by all Amerindians unless 'blown'<br />
on by a piaiman (see chapter 5.2) (Im Thurn 1883: 47, 368). However, this situation<br />
clearly changed over time, and by the 1940's the practice of animal husbandry<br />
appears to have become commonplace among the Wapishana (Peberdy 1948: 18,<br />
31-32). Nowadays it is a very widespread practice: 95 percent of households<br />
interviewed reported that they kept at least some domestic animals. The size of<br />
household stock holdings varied from a single chicken to fairly large numbers of cows,<br />
pigs and other animals. There is clearly a great deal of interhousehold variation in the<br />
relative importance of domestic and wild sources of animal protein.<br />
The Wapishana language has an extensive nomenclature of domestic animals. All<br />
the familiar species - cow (tapi'izi), pig (kooshi), sheep (kazinizo), goat<br />
(boochi), horse (kawaro), donkey (chaakashi), mule (boozo), chicken (kuruku),<br />
turkey (piiru), guinea fowl (pikodu), as well as cat (pishan) and dog (arimaraka) -<br />
have Wapishana names. Many more specific names exist which refer to particular age-<br />
sex classes, and to castrated males. The etymology of these terms has not been<br />
investigated, and it is possible that many, if not all, have been borrowed or adapted<br />
from various of the non-Amerindian languages to which Wapishana people have been<br />
exposed over the course of their recorded history.<br />
The common appearance of domestic animals in myth and folklore attests the<br />
extent to which animal husbandry has been incorporated into Wapishana culture.<br />
Various of the associated skills – those of cattle management being a particularly<br />
impressive example [e.g. See Brock 1972] - have nowadays been seamlessly<br />
integrated into the repertoire of subsistence strategies.<br />
Of the domestic animals, cows, pigs and chickens — the latter generally being<br />
raised for the production of meat rather than eggs, although eggs are also eaten —<br />
are the most important as sources of meat. Horse, donkeys, cats and dogs are not<br />
eaten, and the other species listed above are fairly uncommon. Horses and donkeys<br />
are used as draft animals and for transportation; horses particularly in the location<br />
and rounding-up of cows. Cows are also put to work — to carry heavy loads, or as a<br />
means of transport when ridden or used to pull bullock carts.<br />
A system of herd management based upon open access to grazing lands<br />
operates throughout the Rupununi, allowing cattle and horses especially to roam over<br />
large areas of the savannahs for much of the time. Fences are very rare, and the<br />
notorious Wapishana fence, marking the boundary between reservation lands and the<br />
Dadanawa grazing lease, is derelict over large stretches. Some parts of the Dadanawa