30.12.2012 Views

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

significant improvements in the situation of Amerindian communities adversely<br />

affected. Welcome as such steps are, their long-term impact may prove limited if<br />

they continue to dominate economic development in Guyana’s interior in the current<br />

fashion, and the country remains economically dependent on the operations of largely<br />

transnational corporate enterprises of dubious integrity.<br />

There are two major avenues to rectifying this situation relevant to the subject<br />

matter of this thesis, and possible steps along each have already been taken in<br />

Guyana. Operational reform of both industries, firstly, is already underway. Within the<br />

logging industry in particular, the potential for Amerindian involvement in monitoring<br />

is great, and calls have been made from within both Guyana’s academic community<br />

and the forestry industry itself for the initiation of large-scale programmes to realise<br />

this. From within the industry has come a suggestion for a large-scale programme of<br />

monitoring of logging concessions by members of neighbouring Amerindian<br />

communities, with the direct financial support of the logging companies themselves<br />

(De Freitas 1998). This is in many ways similar to an earlier suggestion for a state-<br />

sponsored programme of training for Amerindian Environmental Monitors who could<br />

represent state interests in monitoring and regulating industrial activities in the<br />

interior, in collaboration with the Forestry Commission and Environmental Protection<br />

Agency (Forte 1995a: 8). Forte’s point that this could be achieved partly through<br />

existing training courses at the Guyana Forestry Commission appears to have been<br />

taken up, if not on the scale she advocates. An article in the Stabroek News of July 3,<br />

1999 reported the then-Minister of Amerindian Affairs to have disclosed that,<br />

starting in 1998, the government had begun to provide five scholarships annually for<br />

the support of Amerindian students training on the Certificate Course in Forestry. The<br />

Minister also noted that the GFC at the time employed 23 Amerindian members of<br />

staff, most of whom had been recruited on the basis of their botanical knowledge and<br />

in particular tree identification skills.<br />

Amerindian knowledge has been a central aspect of Guyana’s logging industry<br />

since its inception, as evinced by the fact that the vernacular terms for most tree<br />

species consist of their Lokono names, some of which have also been incorporated<br />

into Creolese (Polak 1992: 12-13). The proposals described above thus incorporate a<br />

certain historical logic, as well as great practical merit. I would further advocate that<br />

any such programmes incorporate a substantial research effort dedicated to<br />

developing methodologies in ecological monitoring based upon Amerindian knowledge,<br />

whether intellectual or practical in nature. Biological resource inventories currently in<br />

planning or underway, such as the national forest inventory, whose inception was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!