Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...
Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...
Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
characterised as a multiple use system based around long-fallow swidden agriculture,<br />
recognising that the value of this label is somewhat limited by the fact that it<br />
characterises a great diversity of agricultural systems worldwide (Brookfield and<br />
Padoch 1994). Forests are used for agriculture, hunting, lumbering, fishing, and<br />
gathering of foods, medicines, firewood, and the raw materials for building and crafts.<br />
Savannahs provide the major sites of permanent settlement, and are also used for<br />
fishing, livestock rearing, hunting, gathering of plant and animal foods and non-food<br />
items such as building materials, firewood, craft materials and medicines. The<br />
Wapishana subsistence strategy is thus adapted to the exploitation of the resources<br />
offered by both forest and savannah habitats, reflected in a pattern of settlement<br />
that spans the ecotone between the two (Potter 1993: 2).<br />
Within this broad picture there is much variation, both within and between<br />
villages. Some can be ascribed to differences in availability of resources. Sand Creek<br />
village, for example, is situated close to the confluence of two major rivers, has a long<br />
history of involvement in the livestock trade, is fairly close to a number of important<br />
ranches, and suffers a shortage of forest lands within its reservation boundaries. <strong>In</strong><br />
contrast, Maruranau is amply supplied with forest land but is situated some distance<br />
from the nearest sizeable watercourses; opportunities for involvement in the<br />
livestock industry are less readily available and people generally focus to a greater<br />
extent on forest-based activities. This is manifest in a much lower level of hunting in<br />
Sand Creek than Maruranau: whereas 73 percent of Maruranau households<br />
interviewed in the present study reported hunting to be an important subsistence<br />
activity, a socio-economic survey in Sand Creek found there to be only six recognised<br />
hunters among the 118 households in this village (Forte 2000: 64). My impression<br />
from visits to Sand Creek is that hunting is focused much more strongly on the<br />
savannah deer (Odocoileus virginianus) than is the case in Maruranau. <strong>In</strong> contrast, in<br />
the same survey, all households in Sand Creek reported that they engage in fishing,<br />
as opposed to 85 percent of those in Maruranau interviewed in the present study.<br />
People will on occasion travel widely to procure particular resources unavailable in<br />
their home village. Villagers from Maruranau and the neighbouring villages make<br />
seasonal fishing trips to large rivers and lakes in the vicinity of Rupunau and Sand<br />
Creek. During the course of this study Rupunau village council approached Maruranau<br />
to request permission to send a group to visit and collect mokoro, a forest vine<br />
(Ischnosiphon arouma) used to make a variety of household utensils and reported to<br />
be extremely scarce in the vicinity of Rupunau.