30.12.2012 Views

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

distributions. A consideration of subsistence from an ecosystem perspective may<br />

broaden its scope substantially. No species of hunted animal has greater importance<br />

in terms of Wapishana identification with the forest than the white-lipped peccary.<br />

Traditional knowledge of the geographical scales upon which management of this<br />

species must operate, is demonstrated in the wide area over which zones of<br />

restricted access are located, perhaps functioning for the benefit of this species more<br />

than any other. Land use decisions over an area far wider than that subject to<br />

sustained direct use, and beyond the current boundaries of titled land, may thus have<br />

serious implications for Wapishana subsistence and cultural identification with the<br />

natural environment.<br />

The stability of systems of resource use is thus threatened by current and<br />

prospective changes originating in both endogenous and exogenous factors. Their<br />

resilience in the face of change — or to put it another way their ability to adapt in<br />

such a way as to ensure that systems of food production and environmental<br />

management continue to function — is contingent on the nature of their interaction<br />

with external forces. Depending on how they operate, these external forces could, as<br />

has happened so often when traditional societies have been forced to come to terms<br />

with them, effect dramatic breakdowns in local social-ecological systems, to the<br />

certain detriment of the majority of the Wapishana people. On the other hand, a<br />

scenario whereby the local and extra-local interact in a way that is mutually enhancing<br />

is feasible. A key factor to this is the extent to which existing knowledge, skills and<br />

practices relating to the natural environment are permitted to continue to form the<br />

basis of its usage and management.<br />

I have already pointed out that the incorporation of local knowledge is neither<br />

technically simple, nor is it by any means a foolproof method that can guarantee that<br />

development will be both equitable and socially and ecologically sustainable. This<br />

thesis has demonstrated various methodological problems that must be overcome,<br />

and the integration, in practice, of local and scientific systems of knowledge will for<br />

some time continue to be an experimental approach, albeit one which holds much<br />

promise.<br />

9.4 Does the nature of existing ethnoecological knowledge provide<br />

the basis for its integration with scientific approaches in ecology?<br />

The ethnoecological component of this study revealed the presence of a rich body of<br />

skills and knowledge relating to the natural environment, which are applied on an<br />

ongoing basis to overcoming the problems associated with fulfilling subsistence needs

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!