30.12.2012 Views

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.7 Biodiversity <strong>Use</strong>: the synecology of Wapishana subsistence<br />

4.7.1 <strong>Use</strong> of animals<br />

A systematic overview of animal use was achieved in interviews on ethnozoological<br />

nomenclature (see chapter 6.1). <strong>In</strong> these interviews, I elicited a total of 378 named<br />

terminal categories in the animal kingdom. Of these, 169 were normally included in<br />

the category 'wunii', meaning ‘animals eaten by people’, and are thus considered<br />

edible. A few species of animal, both edible and non-edible, have medicinal or<br />

symbolic uses, but these are few in number and not often used, and the ecological<br />

effects of this type of usage are probably minor. I recorded such uses for nine<br />

Wapishana animal categories not normally considered edible, meaning that a total of<br />

47 percent of animal categories named in the Wapishana language have direct human<br />

uses.<br />

As previous sections of this chapter indicate, actual use of animal species is for<br />

the most part restricted to a relatively small number of those species considered<br />

edible. However, some of the species consumed less regularly may be important for<br />

particular people or groups, seasonally, in the provision of micronutrients or as<br />

reserve sources of animal food at times of food stress or when other sources are not<br />

available.<br />

4.7.2 <strong>Use</strong> of plants<br />

Further data on plants use was collected using ethnobotanical survey plots, which<br />

were established at a number of sites in the forest. Within these plots information<br />

was recorded on the floristic composition (in terms of Wapishana ethnobotanical<br />

categories), and the Wapishana researchers involved also recorded information on the<br />

uses of the trees located within. <strong>In</strong> addition, I recorded much information on plant use<br />

on an ad hoc basis, based upon my observations and the statements of collaborators<br />

in other areas of the research programme.<br />

Ethnobotanical survey plots included a total of 199 plant categories of tree<br />

habit. The researchers involved knew uses for 144 of these, and uses for five more<br />

were provided by other informants. The statements of other informants also<br />

corroborated many of the observations recorded in connection with the plot surveys,<br />

and the small number of additional uses recorded suggests that the majority of this<br />

information is widely known. <strong>In</strong> addition, other informants provided the names of a<br />

further 56 segregates not encountered in the survey plots, 51 of which were ascribed<br />

uses. A total of 315 different uses were recorded for these 195 useful segregates.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!