Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 2.1. MAP OF AMERINDIAN SETTLEMENT WITHIN GUYANA........................................................ 24
FIGURE 2.2. MAP OF AMERINDIAN LANDS, LOGGING AND MINING CONCESSIONS (FROM SIZER 1996)............ 36
FIGURE 3.1. THE RIO BRANCO AND RUPUNUNI SAVANNAHS (DERIVED FROM EDEN 1986: 256) .................. 54
FIGURE 3.2. POPULATION STRUCTURE IN SOUTH RUPUNUNI VILLAGES IN 1998....................................... 69
FIGURE 3.3. MAP OF SOUTH RUPUNUNI COMMUNITIES. ..................................................................... 71
FIGURE 3.4. VILLAGE MAP OF MARURANAU .................................................................................... 73
FIGURE 4.1. MAP OF MARURANAU’S FARMING AREA......................................................................... 85
FIGURE 4.2. MAP OF MAIN HUNTING ROADS IN MARURANAU ............................................................ 102
FIGURE 4.3. NUMBER OF TREES NAMED IN WAPISHANA FOR WHICH USES WERE DOCUMENTED WITHIN EACH OF
THE SIX USE CATEGORIES, FOLLOWING JOHNSTON AND COLQUHOUN (1996).................................. 126
FIGURE 4.4. TOTAL NUMBERS OF RECORDED USES FOR TREES WITHIN EACH USE CATEGORY, FOLLOWING
JOHNSTON AND COLQUHOUN (1996) ..................................................................................... 127
FIGURE 4.5. NUMBERS OF TREE SPECIES FOR WHICH MULTIPLE USES PER USE CATEGORY WERE RECORDED. 127
FIGURE 4.6. FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF NUMBER OF USE CATEGORIES IN WHICH TREES WERE REPRESENTED,
FOLLOWING JOHNSTON & COLQUHOUN (1996)........................................................................ 128
FIGURE 4.7. FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF NUMBERS OF REPORTED USES PER TREE, FOLLOWING JOHNSTON
AND COLQUHOUN (1996). ................................................................................................... 129
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 3.1. CHANGES IN POPULATIONS OF SOUTH RUPUNUNI VILLAGES................................................ 68
TABLE 3.2. SOURCES OF INCOME FOR HOUSEHOLDS IN MARURANAU ................................................... 76
TABLE 4.1. PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS INTERVIEWED IN MARURANAU TO REPORT PARTICIPATION IN
VARIOUS CATEGORIES OF SUBSISTENCE ACTIVITY....................................................................... 83
TABLE 4.2. PERCENTAGE OF FARMERS IN MARURANAU REPORTING THE CULTIVATION OF PARTICULAR CROP
SPECIES............................................................................................................................. 91
TABLE 4.3. PERCENTAGE OF INTERVIEWEES LISTING FRUIT TREES GROWN TO INDICATE THE PRESENCES OF
PARTICULAR SPECIES............................................................................................................ 94
TABLE 4.4. PERCENTAGES OF GARDENERS INTERVIEWED IN MARURANAU REPORTING THE CULTIVATIONOF
PARTICULAR PLANTS IN HOUSE GARDENS.................................................................................. 96
TABLE 4.5. PERCENTAGE OF MARURANAU HUNTERS INTERVIEWED TO REPORT HUNTING OF PARTICULAR
CATEGORIES OF GAME ANIMAL............................................................................................. 105
TABLE 4.6. ANIMAL CATEGORIES REPORTED BY HUNTERS TO HAVE EXPERIENCED HIGH MEAN LEVELS OF
HUNTING PRESSURE OVER TIME............................................................................................. 108
TABLE 4.7 ANIMAL CATEGORIES REPORTED BY HUNTERS TO HAVE EXPERIENCED INTERMEDIATE MEAN LEVELS
OF HUNTING PRESSURE OVER TIME. ....................................................................................... 109
TABLE 4.8 ANIMAL CATEGORIES REPORTED BY HUNTERS TO HAVE EXPERIENCED LOW MEAN LEVELS OF
HUNTING PRESSURE OVER TIME. ........................................................................................... 110
TABLE 4.9. PERCENTAGES OF HOUSEHOLDS IN MARURANAU INTERVIEWED INDICATING USE OF GATHERED
ANIMAL FOODS TO REPORT USE OF PARTICULAR CATEGORIES OF SUCH FOODS ................................ 113
TABLE 4.10. PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS INTERVIEWED IN MARURANAU INDICATING THE USE OF WILD
FRUITS TO REPORT THE USE OF FRUITS OF PARTICULAR TREE SPECIES............................................ 118
TABLE 6.1. ETHNOECOLOGICAL DATA ON USE OF FARM CROPS AND PLANTED TREES BY NON-DOMESTICATED
ANIMALS ......................................................................................................................... 173
TABLE 6.2. ETHNOECOLOGICAL DATA ON PLANTS CHARACTERISTIC OF EARLY SUCCESSION IN ABANDONED
FARMS (* INDICATES SPECIES REPORTED TO BE LARGELY OR WHOLLY RESTRICTED TO OLD FARMS)..... 174
TABLE 6.3. PLANTS INDICATED TO BE CHARACTERISTIC OF LATE SUCCESSION IN OLD FARMS. (* INDICATES
SPECIES REPORTED TO BE LARGELY OR WHOLLY RESTRICTED TO OLD FARMS.................................. 175
TABLE 7.1. LIST OF FOOD PLANTS RECORDED IN ETHNOECOLOGICAL INTERVIEWS ON TAYASSU TAJACU, AND
THEIR CORROBORATION IN THE ECOLOGICAL LITERATURE.......................................................... 181
TABLE 7.2. COMPARISON OF ETHNOECOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL DATA SETS FOR TAYASSU TAJACU....... 182
TABLE 7.3. LIST OF FOOD PLANTS RECORDED IN ETHNOECOLOGICAL INTERVIEWS ON TAYASSU PECARI, AND
THEIR CORROBORATION IN THE ECOLOGICAL LITERATURE.......................................................... 184
TABLE 7.4. COMPARISON OF ETHNOECOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL DATA SETS FOR TAYASSU PECARI........ 186
TABLE 7.5. LIST OF FOOD PLANTS RECORDED IN ETHNOECOLOGICAL INTERVIEWS ON TAPIRUS TERRESTRIS AND
THEIR CORROBORATION IN THE ECOLOGICAL LITERATURE.......................................................... 187
TABLE 7.6. COMPARISON OF ETHNOECOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL DATA SETS FOR TAPIRUS TERRESTRIS .. 188