30.12.2012 Views

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

market: exporters interviewed by Edwards suggest that only about 10 percent of<br />

available habitat is exploited for live capture (Edwards 1992: 79), although local<br />

population decline is a possibility. Illegal export of certain species may be a problem:<br />

populations of Arapaima gigas and giant river turtles in the Rewa and Rupununi rivers<br />

are reported to be seriously threatened by capture for export to Brazil, despite their<br />

CITES-1 listing, as the means are simply not available in Guyana for enforcement of<br />

this law.<br />

The effectiveness of CITES in achieving any practical, rather than purely symbolic,<br />

successes in conservation has been called into question (Trexler 1990), and the<br />

Guyanese case supports this argument. Excessive attention and resources are<br />

directed towards an issue of relatively minor importance in terms of national<br />

conservation, at the expense of a country with limited means to fulfil the regulatory<br />

obligations imposed upon it. Furthermore, there is a danger of the economic value of<br />

Guyana's wildlife being reduced by hampering a trade which has the potential to<br />

operate sustainably, and provides employment for Amerindian people within their<br />

local areas and based upon local knowledge. One specific example is the wish of a<br />

north Rupununi community to begin the harvesting of black caimans (Melanosuchus<br />

niger) for meat and skins. Although the local abundance of this species is such that it<br />

has reached pest status and represents a threat to human life, its CITES listing<br />

precludes access to an export market for its products while doing nothing to protect<br />

less numerous populations in other locations from unsustainable exploitation.<br />

Aside from the trade in wild animals, a few species are also harvested for sale as<br />

'bush meat' in restaurants in Georgetown and other coastal settlements. Species I<br />

have noted on the menus in such establishments include laba (Agouti paca), lowland<br />

tapir (Tapirus terrestris), both species of peccary (Tayassu tajacu and T. pecari),<br />

agouti (Dasyprocta agouti), waatrash or capybara (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris), and<br />

unspecified species of cervid (Most likely Odocoileus virginianus and/or Mazama<br />

americana). Various species of fish found in watercourses in the interior also enter<br />

the urban food chain by this route. No data has been collected on the source of these<br />

meats, but as the harvest area involved is necessarily restricted to those areas within<br />

relatively rapid travel distance of Georgetown the impact on animal populations is<br />

likely to be local.<br />

Several animal species native to Guyana have a demonstrated potential for<br />

sustainable harvesting, and in some cases semi-domestication or other forms of<br />

controlled management, which can under appropriate conditions provide an economic<br />

incentive for conservation of their habitats (Werner 1991; Smythe 1991;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!