Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...
Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...
Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
letter, making a detailed and specific claim to an area of savannah and forest of which<br />
it was requested the villages be given joint ownership (Amerindian Lands Commission<br />
1969: 213). The commission rejected the claim as excessive, and beyond the<br />
management capabilities of the communities, and recommended the designation of<br />
discrete, but contiguous, reservations over a far smaller area. (Amerindian Lands<br />
Commission 1969: 71-93).<br />
The land actually awarded covered most of this recommendation, but excluded<br />
the area of land between the reservations of Aishalton and Awarewaunau. The<br />
present-day leaders of these villages have decided to continue to assert their claim to<br />
the entire area originally requested, and over the course of this study this translated<br />
into action. Following the example of the Upper Mazaruni communities, they<br />
requested the assistance of the APA in securing funding and technical assistance for<br />
the undertaking of a land-use mapping project over the area in question. I have since<br />
heard from the region that this has been achieved and the mapping project is<br />
underway. The Lands Commission also received, and also rejected, a less precisely<br />
defined claim for joint ownership of lands from the villages of Sand Creek, Shulinab<br />
and Potarinau (Amerindian Lands Commission 1969). I have been told that these<br />
communities, along with the other villages of the South-Central District, including the<br />
untitled villages of Rupunau, Parikwarawaunau, Katoonarib and Shiriri, have since<br />
joined forces to pursue a joint land claim. The claim has apparently been submitted to<br />
the government but has not so far progressed any further.<br />
3.3.2 Local attitudes to conservation<br />
The various data collected on local attitudes to conservation reflected a diverse<br />
range of local opinion, both within and between villages. With a small number of<br />
exceptions, formal and informal village leaders considered conservation of biological<br />
resources to be of great importance. This was mainly expressed in utilitarian terms,<br />
emphasising the need to ensure continued supplies of natural resources upon which<br />
people depend for subsistence. Many people also emphasised the importance of<br />
cultural conservation in these terms, clearly demonstrating that they considered this<br />
subject to be inseparable from that of biological conservation. The concept of<br />
independence was often mentioned, both in terms of an ideology emphasising self-<br />
sufficiency and as a practical necessity. For example, some people pointed out the<br />
value of local knowledge of medicinal plants, given the limited nature of formal health<br />
care facilities available in most parts of the region. More abstract considerations were<br />
also mentioned by some, including the importance of conservation for maintaining the