Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...
Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...
Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 10: CONCLUSION<br />
10.1 Summary of thesis<br />
The research on which this thesis is based was concerned with the potential<br />
contribution of ethnoecology to development and conservation. As the review of the<br />
literature in the first chapter showed, this is a subject which has been given much<br />
attention in recent years, thanks to its well-established importance in providing for<br />
the collaboration and empowerment of local people in development, and helping to<br />
ensure that initiatives are appropriate to local lifestyles, competencies and<br />
aspirations. However, there is a great need for field data on ethnoecology and all<br />
aspects of local knowledge in order to evaluate objectively its strengths and<br />
limitations, and thus work towards its practical application in development. This thesis<br />
contributes to providing such data. <strong>In</strong> it, particular attention is given to the nature of<br />
the interaction between ethnoecology and scientific biology: ethnoecology is to be<br />
evaluated in the light of a possible complimentary relationship between the two,<br />
which could allow for their integration in practice.<br />
<strong>In</strong> chapter two, it was argued that development initiatives in Guyana, as<br />
promoted by government, industry, international financial institutions and NGO’s, had<br />
failed to recognise sufficiently the potential contribution of indigenous knowledge to<br />
the immense problem of reconciling short- and long- term economic needs with the<br />
upholding of the rights of Amerindian populations to maintain their lifestyles,<br />
economic independence, and tribal identity, and the related need for maintaining<br />
biodiversity and ecological functions at national and regional levels. The past, present,<br />
and potential future contributions of indigenous knowledge and skills to the national<br />
economy were noted. I also noted that much talk promoting attention to indigenous<br />
knowledge in development in Guyana, as elsewhere, is rhetorical, and that there is a<br />
shortage of empirical data that could be used to evaluate competing arguments and<br />
provide a guide for concrete action.<br />
Chapter three continued this theme at the local level: that of the Rupununi<br />
region, where the Guyanese population of Wapishana people reside and where this<br />
study was located. <strong>In</strong> this region, not unusually in Guyana, actual and potential<br />
threats to indigenous security and land tenure exist in the form of diverse outside<br />
interests in its natural resources. Mineral exploration and extraction and large-scale,<br />
outsider-led conservation projects are chief among these, while industrial logging<br />
remains a future possibility. Wapishana people, like Amerindian groups in Guyana as a<br />
whole, are asserting their interests via claims for land extension and an insistence on