30.12.2012 Views

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

industries have been identified as the main causes of degradation and destruction of<br />

Guyana's forests (Colchester 1998).<br />

2.4.1 Amerindians and the Mineral <strong>In</strong>dustry in Guyana<br />

Mining for gold and diamonds has a long history in Guyana, archaeological evidence<br />

suggesting that gold was mined in the Upper Mazaruni in pre-Colombian times. Gold<br />

was important to both colonial and national economies from the mid-19th century<br />

until the decline of the industry in the 1980's. The 1990's saw a huge increase in<br />

mining both by small scale independent miners, locally referred to as pork-knockers,<br />

and non-Guyanese multinationals, which has brought the industry into conflict with<br />

Amerindian people in many areas of Guyana (Anselmo and Mackay 1999: 46-47). This<br />

has been most thoroughly studied in the Upper Mazaruni, where large numbers of<br />

pork-knockers operate close to, and often upon, Amerindian lands. Multinationals<br />

operating in the area have also intruded on titled village land without permission,<br />

damaging farms in at least one area. Mining operations are reported to have caused<br />

extensive environmental damage, making the river useless for all domestic purposes.<br />

Fish stocks have almost disappeared, and populations of game animals are also highly<br />

depleted as a result of hunting by and on behalf of miners and the noise associated<br />

with mining operations. Subsistence activities such as maintaining a farm have been<br />

neglected by many local residents drawn to the mines in search of cash, and<br />

dependence on imported foods and malnutrition are now common in formerly self-<br />

sufficient communities. Social effects include increased economic inequality, the<br />

breakdown of traditional family systems, involvement of Amerindian women in<br />

prostitution and an increase in schoolgirl pregnancy (Forte 1997: 77-81, Anselmo<br />

and Mackay 1999: 61-64).<br />

Despite these reported negative impacts of small-scale mining upon Amerindian<br />

communities in its vicinity, it is simpistic to regard these communities as in simple<br />

confrontation with the industry. Large numbers of Amerindian people are themselves<br />

involved in small-scale mining activities, and for many it is their only means of access<br />

to the cash economy. A study of mining communities close to the Guyana-Brazil<br />

border suggested that the presence of non-Amerindian miners in these areas<br />

increases the potential economic output of the Amerindian segment of the workforce.<br />

The presence of Brazilian miners, usually working illegally, was considered to be<br />

particularly important in effecting infrastructural improvements and increasing the<br />

availability of petrol and other goods. This, it was concluded, financial benefits<br />

Amerindian miners, whose potential income from mining is elevated (Roopnaraine

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!