30.12.2012 Views

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

avoidance by people of particular areas of forest, river and savannah (chapters 5.3-<br />

5.5). These systems are not explicitly recognised to have conservation functions, and<br />

it is therefore possible that any such functions could be overlooked in a transition<br />

from customary to planned and conscious systems for managing wild resources.<br />

Covert systems of management may for this reason be more vulnerable to disruption<br />

by changes in belief systems and practices.<br />

It must be stressed once more than the conservation/management functions of<br />

the systems described are putative. <strong>In</strong>vestigation of whether they do have the<br />

functions I suggest would require the collection of data on their actual effects on<br />

human behaviour, and of the ecological consequences of this. It would be a mistake<br />

to assume that a system of this sort must necessarily have a conservation function in<br />

the absence of such empirical corroboration, even if a qualitative description suggests<br />

that this may be the case. Eghenter (2000) reports the adoption by conservationists<br />

of such an apparent misconception concerning traditional systems of land tenure in<br />

the vicinity of the Kayan Mentarang National Park in East Kalimantan, <strong>In</strong>donesia, and<br />

points out the danger in assuming that such systems have conservationist<br />

orientations. However, in the case study provided, the system in question provided a<br />

strong case for the consideration of indigenous rights of access in planning the<br />

protected area, and has formed the basis of an ongoing dialogue between<br />

conservationists and local communities. <strong>In</strong> certain socio-political contexts, therefore,<br />

traditional practices can contribute to the resilience of the social-ecological system,<br />

even if they did not, in fact, have any such traditional function.<br />

Local management of natural resources is becoming an issue as a result of<br />

ecological change that is occurring from both within and without. Unsustainable<br />

resource use practices are an obvious threat to any subsistence system based upon<br />

natural ecological processes. Although the present scale of resource degradation, as<br />

recorded in the present study, is small, there is the real prospect that it may be<br />

magnified in the face of an increasing population with greater demands, and in<br />

particular if current methods for the exploitation of the natural environment, and for<br />

the regulation of this exploitation, are not effectively passed on. From without there<br />

is the prospect of the incursion of extractive industries, and the more benign though<br />

still potentially dangerous interests of conservationists whose agenda might conflict<br />

with that of local populations (chapter 3.1).<br />

The present study demonstrates a measure of dependence on resources beyond<br />

the current boundaries of titled land. Some of this is based upon direct uses such as<br />

hunting grounds, fishing sites and sources of wild products with very local

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!