30.12.2012 Views

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

own initiative rather than as a response to any overt social pressure, as in Wapishana<br />

society people tend to speak out about such things only as a last resort. One notable<br />

exception to the apparently relaxed operation of this system concerns a farming road<br />

in Maruranau along which one man cut a short cut. Since he did this job alone, it is<br />

reported, he enforced his rights of ownership to the fullest extent by refusing<br />

permission to anyone else even to walk along this trail, which was thus used only by<br />

his family up until the time of his death. Conversely, those farming in isolated<br />

locations will sometimes encourage a neighbour or relative to cut a farm nearby, for<br />

the sake of company and mutual assistance.<br />

Social and ecological factors thus interact in the choice of location, or locations,<br />

used by any particular family for farming. The system of ownership and permission<br />

outlined above operates in a low-key fashion such as to disperse people away from<br />

areas of high local agricultural pressure and maintain farms at a suitably low density.<br />

The social consequence is that each farming road will be occupied by a number of<br />

families connected sanguinely, affinaly or in some cases by friendship. These farming<br />

communities effectively operate as forest-based sub-settlements, which owing to the<br />

variety possible in the cognatic systems of allocation of both residential and farming<br />

location, will correspond to varying degrees with the hamlets forming the residential<br />

units in the village.<br />

<strong>In</strong> general, agricultural activities are the major feature of day-to-day life in a<br />

Wapishana village. Adults generally spend most of their days at the farm, occupied<br />

with the ongoing tasks of weeding, replanting and harvesting and processing crops.<br />

Children are expected to assist — as they are with domestic and subsistence tasks in<br />

general — as soon as they are old enough to be able. Children of school age are thus<br />

able to supplement their school teachings with a traditional education. This may help<br />

to counterbalance the cultural degradation resulting from the adoption of formal<br />

education that has been observed amongst Amerindian communities elsewhere in<br />

Guyana (Forte 1993: 8-9). During term-time, Saturday is a weekly peak of agricultural<br />

activity, being the only day when schoolchildren are available for a full day's work at<br />

the farm. Many families take advantage of the opportunity provided by the long<br />

school holidays of July and August to spend extended periods at the farm. Periods of<br />

extended residence in the forest are such a common feature of Wapishana life that a<br />

realistic concept of Wapishana settlement must encompass the farming area (cf. Ellen<br />

1978: 26).<br />

Consistent with the findings of previous studies among the Wapishana, many<br />

families in Maruranau have a second dwelling, either in the forest, at the savannah

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!