30.12.2012 Views

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation And Development In A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

species of subsistence importance. The other was to conduct interviews with several<br />

different people on a focal group of species. This focal group consisted of those<br />

species that exemplified the criteria listed above, and comprised the majority of the<br />

most important game animals, along with all but the smallest members of the primate<br />

order. Reasonable quantities of ecological information collected in scientific studies<br />

have been published for many of these species. <strong>In</strong> the case of primates, one study<br />

presents ecological data collected in Suriname for all eight species found at the site<br />

of the present study (Mittermeier and Roosmalen 1981). For commonly hunted<br />

animals, some - particularly the ungulate species - have been fairly well-studied, but<br />

generally in locations at vast distances from Southern Guyana, and in very different<br />

habitats (see references in chapter seven for details).<br />

Most interviews conformed to a standard format. Each would begin with either of<br />

the questions: "What do you know about.....(species x)", or "What can you tell me<br />

about....(species x)". <strong>In</strong> some cases when the subject of the interview was chosen by<br />

the interviewee, this first question was anticipated by the interviewee and therefore<br />

omitted. <strong>In</strong> any case, the interviewee would be allowed to talk uninterrupted for as<br />

long as desired; I would intervene at this stage only on rare occasions when I<br />

determined the interviewee to have deviated excessively from the topic in hand. This<br />

was an exceptional occurrence, as in some cases such deviation proved to be a<br />

source of useful information which might not have emerged in the course of a more<br />

structured interview.<br />

Following the first stage, I would ask the interviewee to expand upon or clarify<br />

certain points raised in the initial response. A series of specific questions would then<br />

be asked on a set of subjects which I considered to comprise a basic overview of the<br />

ecology of any animal species. Essentially, the questions corresponded to those that I<br />

would hope to address were I engaged in a conventional programme of research on<br />

the synecology of the animal in question. Subject areas covered were diet ("What<br />

does it eat?, "Does it experience food shortage at any time and if so what does it eat<br />

then?", or "What is its most important food?"), dispersal behaviour of frugivores<br />

("Does it plant or spread any seeds", or "What happens to the seeds it eats?"), social<br />

behaviour ("How many move together?"), predation and competition ("Does anything<br />

eat it?" and "Does it have any enemies?"), reproduction ("when does it give birth?",<br />

"How often can it give birth?" and "How many young does it give birth to at once?"),<br />

classification (Does it have any partners?", and given a positive response to the<br />

previous question, "Why do you say these are partners?"), and human use ("Do

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!