16.01.2013 Views

Report from the Sub-comittee on the environment and health

Report from the Sub-comittee on the environment and health

Report from the Sub-comittee on the environment and health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The estimated intake <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

animal food products <strong>and</strong><br />

fish<br />

The estimated intake <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

drinking water<br />

Overall assessment of<br />

intake <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> food products<br />

<strong>and</strong> drinking water<br />

The Danish Veterinary & Food Administrati<strong>on</strong> has been m<strong>on</strong>itoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

c<strong>on</strong>tent of pesticide residues in animal food products for many years. The<br />

analyses have primarily been directed at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> chlorinated pesticides, such<br />

as DDT, HCB <strong>and</strong> similar fat-soluble compounds, but analyses have also<br />

been carried out for residues of organophosphorous pesticides in meat.<br />

No residual c<strong>on</strong>tent of organophosphorous pesticides has been detected<br />

in meat, but a chr<strong>on</strong>ic c<strong>on</strong>tent of chlorinated pesticide residues has been<br />

found in both animal food products <strong>and</strong> fish. However, this residual<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tent represents substances that have been banned in pesticides for<br />

many years. Their occurrence in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> food products is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore a result of<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir earlier use, which has resulted in extensive <strong>and</strong> permanent<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>mental polluti<strong>on</strong> with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se persistent substances.<br />

Since <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> exposure of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sumers to pesticide residues <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> animal<br />

food products <strong>and</strong> fish is primarily a questi<strong>on</strong> of “<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sins of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> past”<br />

<strong>and</strong> does not c<strong>on</strong>cern <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pesticides authorised for use today, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

exposure does not depend <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> extent of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> use of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pesticides<br />

currently used in Denmark.<br />

In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> last few years it has been recognised that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is widespread<br />

polluti<strong>on</strong> of our groundwater with pesticides. There is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore a<br />

potential risk of such c<strong>on</strong>taminants in our drinking water <strong>and</strong> thus a risk<br />

of exposure of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> populati<strong>on</strong> through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> water.<br />

Since drinking-water wells in which a residual c<strong>on</strong>tent has been detected<br />

have hi<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rto been closed, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> real exposure of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sumer is limited.<br />

However, this does not exclude <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> possibility of undiscovered polluti<strong>on</strong><br />

of local wells that can result in significant exposure of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> local<br />

inhabitants.<br />

It must <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore generally be assumed that drinking water meets current<br />

limit values, which state that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tent of individual pesticide residues<br />

must not exceed 0.1 microgramme per litre, while <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total c<strong>on</strong>tent of<br />

pesticides must not exceed 0.5 microgrammes per litre.<br />

With a normal c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> of 2 litres of water per day, a c<strong>on</strong>sumer thus<br />

receives less than 0.2 microgrammes of an individual pesticide, <strong>and</strong> his<br />

or her total pesticide intake <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> drinking water is less than 1<br />

microgramme per day.<br />

When <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> estimated maximum intake <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> drinking water of 1<br />

microgramme per day is compared with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> estimated intake of approx.<br />

190 microgramme per day <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> fruit <strong>and</strong> vegetables, it must be<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cluded that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> intake <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> drinking water is generally negligible <strong>and</strong><br />

disappears in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> uncertainty that lies in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> estimati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> intake <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

vegetable food products.<br />

As will be seen <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> foregoing review of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pesticide intake <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> different types of food products <strong>and</strong> drinking water, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> predominant<br />

sources of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> general populati<strong>on</strong>’s exposure to pesticides are fruit <strong>and</strong><br />

vegetables <strong>and</strong> cereals <strong>and</strong> cereal products, while <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> intake <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

drinking water, animal food products <strong>and</strong> fish is of no significance for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

total exposure.<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!