Report from the Sub-comittee on the environment and health
Report from the Sub-comittee on the environment and health
Report from the Sub-comittee on the environment and health
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Effect <strong>on</strong> seed producti<strong>on</strong><br />
The wild flora in hedgerows<br />
<strong>and</strong> small biotopes<br />
Effect <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> flora through<br />
spray drift<br />
slowly, it would be necessary to establish permanent spray-free <strong>and</strong><br />
fertiliser-free edge z<strong>on</strong>es.<br />
It has been shown that sub-lethal doses of herbicides lead to a reducti<strong>on</strong><br />
in plants’ seed producti<strong>on</strong>. The reducti<strong>on</strong> is related to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> dose, <strong>and</strong> this<br />
is probably directly related to a smaller biomass producti<strong>on</strong> (Rasmussen<br />
1993; Anderss<strong>on</strong> 1994). For example, a sub-lethal dose (1/2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> normal<br />
dose) of isoprotur<strong>on</strong> resulted in a 50 per cent reducti<strong>on</strong> in seed<br />
producti<strong>on</strong> in comm<strong>on</strong> pennycress (Hald 1993). In a Danish study it was<br />
shown that seed producti<strong>on</strong> in unsprayed field plots was 6-14 times<br />
higher than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> seed producti<strong>on</strong> in sprayed plots (Kjellss<strong>on</strong>, Rasmussen<br />
1995). At <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same time, spraying with herbicides (dichlorprop + 2,4-<br />
D/MCPA in normal dosage) resulted in a smaller proporti<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
surviving plants being able to propagate. It has been shown that some<br />
herbicides (tribenur<strong>on</strong>-methyl <strong>and</strong>, to a lesser extent, MCPA) can result<br />
in a smaller seed size in some species, such as black bindweed,<br />
goosegrass <strong>and</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> pennycress (Anderss<strong>on</strong> 1994). With this<br />
knowledge <strong>and</strong> different scenarios for herbicide use (0 <strong>and</strong> 100%), it<br />
would be possible to model <strong>and</strong> estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effects <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> seed pool in<br />
farml<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sequences in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> form of changes in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> frequency<br />
<strong>and</strong> compositi<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> vegetati<strong>on</strong> (Kjellss<strong>on</strong>, Rasmussen 1995; Madsen<br />
et al. 1996, 1997, 1999).<br />
Herbicides are normally not used in hedgerows <strong>and</strong> small biotopes, so<br />
any impact <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se areas is due to unintended effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> agricultural<br />
use of herbicides, e.g. through spray drift (see secti<strong>on</strong> 4.1.6.2). During a<br />
5-year period, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> flora in Danish field hedges showed a slight tendency<br />
to c<strong>on</strong>tain more species al<strong>on</strong>g unsprayed edges of fields than al<strong>on</strong>g<br />
sprayed <strong>on</strong>es (Hald et al. 1994). A 50% st<strong>and</strong>ard trial treatment with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
herbicide fluroxypyr of a fallow field <strong>on</strong> s<strong>and</strong>y soil in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ne<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rl<strong>and</strong>s<br />
reduced <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tent of species (Kleijn, Snoeijing 1997). Effects <strong>on</strong><br />
survival at lower dosages (5 <strong>and</strong> 10 %) were <strong>on</strong>ly found for a few species<br />
in some years. In ano<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r Dutch study, de Snoo (1997) found, in a threeyear<br />
trial, increased species diversity in unsprayed field edges in sugar<br />
beet, potatoes <strong>and</strong> winter wheat, primarily as a c<strong>on</strong>sequence of an<br />
increase in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number of dicotyled<strong>on</strong>ous plants.<br />
There exists a set of st<strong>and</strong>ardised values <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> Germany for spray drift.<br />
The values are based <strong>on</strong> 16 field trials in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> period <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1989 to 1992,<br />
where, <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> basis of a 95% percentile, a so-called “realistic worst case”<br />
was established (Ganzelmeier et al. 1995). On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> basis of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se values<br />
<strong>and</strong> known effect thresholds (PC Plant Protecti<strong>on</strong>), a qualitative analysis<br />
can be carried out of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effects <strong>on</strong> plant growth. The method used by<br />
Ganzelmeier is not necessarily ecologically relevant. The depositi<strong>on</strong> was<br />
measured during spraying with a single spray plume, <strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> spray<br />
product was collected <strong>on</strong> flat targets laid <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ground. Such data are<br />
relevant for estimating <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effect <strong>on</strong> plants that have not yet germinated<br />
<strong>and</strong> for “flat” areas like p<strong>on</strong>ds <strong>and</strong> lakes. However, plants that have<br />
germinated <strong>and</strong> are established “catch” more of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> spray product. Both<br />
Davis et al. (1993) <strong>and</strong> Bui et al. (1998) found that different “targets” had<br />
different “catch efficiencies”. “Targets” that rise above <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ground <strong>and</strong><br />
have a complex structure catch more spray product than objects lying flat<br />
<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ground. Finally, Nordby <strong>and</strong> Skuterud (1975) found that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> dose<br />
of spray product needed to trigger a given effect is smaller for plants in<br />
75