16.01.2013 Views

Report from the Sub-comittee on the environment and health

Report from the Sub-comittee on the environment and health

Report from the Sub-comittee on the environment and health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Effect <strong>on</strong> seed producti<strong>on</strong><br />

The wild flora in hedgerows<br />

<strong>and</strong> small biotopes<br />

Effect <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> flora through<br />

spray drift<br />

slowly, it would be necessary to establish permanent spray-free <strong>and</strong><br />

fertiliser-free edge z<strong>on</strong>es.<br />

It has been shown that sub-lethal doses of herbicides lead to a reducti<strong>on</strong><br />

in plants’ seed producti<strong>on</strong>. The reducti<strong>on</strong> is related to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> dose, <strong>and</strong> this<br />

is probably directly related to a smaller biomass producti<strong>on</strong> (Rasmussen<br />

1993; Anderss<strong>on</strong> 1994). For example, a sub-lethal dose (1/2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> normal<br />

dose) of isoprotur<strong>on</strong> resulted in a 50 per cent reducti<strong>on</strong> in seed<br />

producti<strong>on</strong> in comm<strong>on</strong> pennycress (Hald 1993). In a Danish study it was<br />

shown that seed producti<strong>on</strong> in unsprayed field plots was 6-14 times<br />

higher than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> seed producti<strong>on</strong> in sprayed plots (Kjellss<strong>on</strong>, Rasmussen<br />

1995). At <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same time, spraying with herbicides (dichlorprop + 2,4-<br />

D/MCPA in normal dosage) resulted in a smaller proporti<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

surviving plants being able to propagate. It has been shown that some<br />

herbicides (tribenur<strong>on</strong>-methyl <strong>and</strong>, to a lesser extent, MCPA) can result<br />

in a smaller seed size in some species, such as black bindweed,<br />

goosegrass <strong>and</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> pennycress (Anderss<strong>on</strong> 1994). With this<br />

knowledge <strong>and</strong> different scenarios for herbicide use (0 <strong>and</strong> 100%), it<br />

would be possible to model <strong>and</strong> estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effects <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> seed pool in<br />

farml<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sequences in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> form of changes in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> frequency<br />

<strong>and</strong> compositi<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> vegetati<strong>on</strong> (Kjellss<strong>on</strong>, Rasmussen 1995; Madsen<br />

et al. 1996, 1997, 1999).<br />

Herbicides are normally not used in hedgerows <strong>and</strong> small biotopes, so<br />

any impact <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se areas is due to unintended effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> agricultural<br />

use of herbicides, e.g. through spray drift (see secti<strong>on</strong> 4.1.6.2). During a<br />

5-year period, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> flora in Danish field hedges showed a slight tendency<br />

to c<strong>on</strong>tain more species al<strong>on</strong>g unsprayed edges of fields than al<strong>on</strong>g<br />

sprayed <strong>on</strong>es (Hald et al. 1994). A 50% st<strong>and</strong>ard trial treatment with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

herbicide fluroxypyr of a fallow field <strong>on</strong> s<strong>and</strong>y soil in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ne<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

reduced <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tent of species (Kleijn, Snoeijing 1997). Effects <strong>on</strong><br />

survival at lower dosages (5 <strong>and</strong> 10 %) were <strong>on</strong>ly found for a few species<br />

in some years. In ano<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r Dutch study, de Snoo (1997) found, in a threeyear<br />

trial, increased species diversity in unsprayed field edges in sugar<br />

beet, potatoes <strong>and</strong> winter wheat, primarily as a c<strong>on</strong>sequence of an<br />

increase in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number of dicotyled<strong>on</strong>ous plants.<br />

There exists a set of st<strong>and</strong>ardised values <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> Germany for spray drift.<br />

The values are based <strong>on</strong> 16 field trials in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> period <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1989 to 1992,<br />

where, <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> basis of a 95% percentile, a so-called “realistic worst case”<br />

was established (Ganzelmeier et al. 1995). On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> basis of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se values<br />

<strong>and</strong> known effect thresholds (PC Plant Protecti<strong>on</strong>), a qualitative analysis<br />

can be carried out of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effects <strong>on</strong> plant growth. The method used by<br />

Ganzelmeier is not necessarily ecologically relevant. The depositi<strong>on</strong> was<br />

measured during spraying with a single spray plume, <strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> spray<br />

product was collected <strong>on</strong> flat targets laid <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ground. Such data are<br />

relevant for estimating <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effect <strong>on</strong> plants that have not yet germinated<br />

<strong>and</strong> for “flat” areas like p<strong>on</strong>ds <strong>and</strong> lakes. However, plants that have<br />

germinated <strong>and</strong> are established “catch” more of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> spray product. Both<br />

Davis et al. (1993) <strong>and</strong> Bui et al. (1998) found that different “targets” had<br />

different “catch efficiencies”. “Targets” that rise above <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ground <strong>and</strong><br />

have a complex structure catch more spray product than objects lying flat<br />

<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ground. Finally, Nordby <strong>and</strong> Skuterud (1975) found that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> dose<br />

of spray product needed to trigger a given effect is smaller for plants in<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!