Report from the Sub-comittee on the environment and health
Report from the Sub-comittee on the environment and health
Report from the Sub-comittee on the environment and health
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Models for volatilisati<strong>on</strong><br />
46<br />
• It is primarily droplets with a diameter of less than 100 micrometres<br />
that are transported with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> wind.<br />
• Small droplets are formed when larger droplets evaporate in dry air.<br />
• Pesticides with a very low vapour pressure cannot be transported to<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> atmosphere by volatilisati<strong>on</strong>. Even so, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y are found in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
atmosphere <strong>and</strong> in precipitati<strong>on</strong> because <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y can be transported as<br />
small particles formed <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> droplets of spray liquid that are borne <strong>and</strong><br />
dried in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> air.<br />
• A low boom height reduces <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> quantity of small droplets that form<br />
through volatilisati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
• In dry air, large droplets change into small droplets through<br />
volatilisati<strong>on</strong>. Spraying in moist air reduces <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> volatilisati<strong>on</strong>. The air<br />
is often moist <strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> wind velocity low in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> morning hours, so <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
risk of drift is generally lowest <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n.<br />
• Little is known about <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> magnitude of drift <strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> exposure of<br />
terrestrial <strong>and</strong> aquatic biotopes. In current practice, terrestrial biotopes<br />
are protected by means of spray-free z<strong>on</strong>es <strong>and</strong> aquatic envir<strong>on</strong>ments<br />
are protected by means of substance-specific distance requirements in<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> authorisati<strong>on</strong> of pesticides.<br />
4.6.5 Volatilisati<strong>on</strong><br />
Pesticides evaporate both during <strong>and</strong>, especially, after spraying. Toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r<br />
with drift, see secti<strong>on</strong> 4.6.2, volatilisati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>veys relatively large<br />
quantities of pesticides to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> atmosphere, which is thus, quantitatively,<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> principal transport path for pesticides away <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sprayed area.<br />
Lastly, it should be noted that c<strong>on</strong>siderable quantities of pesticides can be<br />
transported by wind erosi<strong>on</strong> – for example, if <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a storm after<br />
spraying of crops in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> spring, when <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant density is low. The<br />
volatilisati<strong>on</strong> depends <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> properties of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> substance <strong>and</strong>, particularly,<br />
<strong>on</strong> its vapour pressure. The temperature, water solubility <strong>and</strong> adsorpti<strong>on</strong><br />
to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> soil <strong>and</strong> plant surfaces, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> humidity of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> soil, atmospheric<br />
turbulence, <strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pesticide, including its<br />
degradati<strong>on</strong>, also play an important part. It is difficult to measure <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
volatilisati<strong>on</strong> because of its great natural variability (Løkke 1998).<br />
Volatilisati<strong>on</strong> of pesticides depends <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> aforementi<strong>on</strong>ed factors <strong>and</strong><br />
can be calculated by means of ma<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>matical models that include <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
main factors governing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> volatilisati<strong>on</strong>. Jansma <strong>and</strong> Linders (1995)<br />
calculated <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> volatilisati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> earth by means of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
so-called “Dow method”, which takes account of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pesticides’ vapour<br />
pressure, water solubility <strong>and</strong> adsorpti<strong>on</strong> to soil as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> factors governing<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> volatilisati<strong>on</strong>. The method was validated by comparis<strong>on</strong> with<br />
measured values. This method can thus be used for crops grown in rows,<br />
where <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant cover is small <strong>and</strong> most of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pesticides hit <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface<br />
of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> earth. The calculated values generally lay within a factor of 7 <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> measured values. However, this model has a tendency to overestimate<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> volatilisati<strong>on</strong>. There are as yet no suitable models for estimating <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
volatilisati<strong>on</strong> of pesticides that are mixed with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> soil during harrowing<br />
<strong>and</strong> ploughing. It is also difficult to make a general model for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
volatilisati<strong>on</strong> of pesticides <str<strong>on</strong>g>from</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> plants.