13.02.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FIEST CLASS OF OBJECTS FOR THE SUBJECT. 81<br />

(according to Gothe s perfectly correct and true theory of<br />

colours), and also of the growing indistinctness of all out<br />

lines. In Italy, where the atmosphere is very transparent,<br />

this datum loses its power and is apt to mislead : Tivoli,<br />

for instance, seems to be very near when seen from Frascati.<br />

On the other hand, all objects appear larger in a mist,<br />

which is an abnormal exaggeration of the datum ; be<br />

cause our Understanding assumes them to be further<br />

from us.<br />

Finally, there remains the estimation of distance by<br />

means of the size (known to us intuitively) of intervening<br />

objects, such as fields, woods, rivers, &c. &c. This mode<br />

of estimation is only applicable where there is uninter<br />

rupted succession : in other words, it can only be applied<br />

to terrestrial, not to celestial objects. Moreover, we have<br />

in general more practice in using it horizontally than ver<br />

tically: a ball on the top of a tower 200 feet high appears<br />

much smaller to us than when lying on the ground 200<br />

feet from us ; because, in the latter case, we estimate the<br />

distance more accurately. When we see human beings in<br />

such a way, that what lies between them and ourselves is<br />

in a great measure hidden from our sight, they always<br />

appear strikingly small.<br />

The fact that our Understanding assumes everything it<br />

perceives in a horizontal direction to be farther off, therefore<br />

larger, than what is seen in a vertical direction, must partly<br />

be attributed to this last mode of estimating distances, inas<br />

much as it only holds good when applied horizontally arid<br />

to terrestrial objects ; but partly also to our estimation of<br />

distances by atmospheric perspective, which is subject to<br />

similar conditions. This is why the moon seems so much<br />

larger on the horizon than at its zenith, although its visual<br />

angle accurately measured that is, the image projected by<br />

it on to the eye is not at all larger in one case than in the<br />

other ; and this also accounts for the flattened appearance of<br />

,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!