13.02.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GENERAL SUEVET. 11<br />

sea quid ipsa ejus naturce immensitas est CAUSA, SIVE RATIO,<br />

propter quam nulla causa indiget ad existendum. Ke ought<br />

to have said : The immensity of God is a logical reason<br />

from which it follows, that Grod needs no cause ; whereas<br />

he confounds the two together and obviously has no clear<br />

consciousness of the difference between reason and cause.<br />

Properly speaking however, it is his intention which mars<br />

his insight. For here, where the law of causality demands<br />

a cause, he substitutes a reason instead of it, because the<br />

latter, unlike the former, does not immediately lead to<br />

something beyond it ; and thus, by means of this very<br />

axiom, he clears the way to the Ontological Proof of the<br />

existence of G-od, which was really his invention, for Anselm<br />

had only indicated it in a general manner. Immediately<br />

after these axioms, of which I have just quoted the first,<br />

there comes a formal, quite serious statement of the Onto<br />

logical Proof, which, in fact, already lies within that axiom,<br />

as the chicken does within the egg that has been long<br />

brooded over. Thus, while everything else stands in need<br />

of a cause for its existence, the immensitas implied in the<br />

conception of the Deity who is introduced to us upon the<br />

ladder of the Cosmological Proof suffices in lieu of a<br />

cause or, as the proof itself expresses it : in conceptu entis<br />

summe perfecti existentia necessaria continetur. This, then,<br />

is the sleight-of-hand trick, for the sake of which the con<br />

fusion, familiar even to Aristotle, of the two principal<br />

meanings of the principle of sufficient reason, has been<br />

used directly in majorem Dei gloriam.<br />

Considered by daylight, however, and without prejudice,<br />

this famous Ontological Proof is really a charming joke.<br />

On some occasion or other, some one excogitates a con<br />

ception, composed out of all sorts of predicates, among which<br />

however he takes care to include the predicate actuality or<br />

existence, either openly stated or wrapped up for decency s<br />

sake in some other predicate, such as perfectio, immensitas,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!