13.02.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

154 THE FOTJBFOLD BOOT. [CHAP. VI.<br />

an object for our faculty of representation, nor have we<br />

consciousness of it, until it is connected with what is<br />

material in our knowledge.<br />

36. Principle of the Sufficient Reason of Being. .<br />

Space and Time are so constituted, that all their parts<br />

stand in mutual relation, so that each of them conditions<br />

and is conditioned by another. We call this relation in<br />

Space, position ; in Time, succession. These relations are<br />

peculiar ones, differing entirely from all other possible<br />

relations of our representations ; neither the Understand<br />

ing nor the Reason are therefore able to grasp them by<br />

means of mere conceptions, and pure intuition a priori<br />

alone makes them intelligible to us ; for it is impossible<br />

by mere conceptions to explain clearly what is meant by<br />

above and below, right and left, behind and before, before<br />

and after. Kant rightly confirms this by the assertion,<br />

that the distinction between our right and left glove can<br />

not be made intelligible in any other way than by intui<br />

tion. Now, the law by which the divisions of Space and<br />

of Time determine one another reciprocally with reference<br />

to these relations (position and succession) is what I call<br />

the Principle of the Sufficient Reason of Being, principium<br />

rationis sufficientis essendi. I have already given an example<br />

of this relation in 15, by which I have shown, through<br />

the connection between the sides and angles of a triangle,<br />

that this relation is not only quite different from that<br />

between cause and effect, but also from that between<br />

reason of knowledge and consequent ;<br />

wherefore here the<br />

condition may be called Reason of Being, ratio essendi.<br />

The insight into such a reason of being can, of course, be<br />

into the law<br />

come a reason of knowing : just as the insight<br />

of causality and its application to a particular case is the<br />

reason of knowledge of the effect ; but this in no way

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!