13.02.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54 THE FOURFOLD BOOT. [CHAP. IV.<br />

rior, consciously performed<br />

actions of all animals. The<br />

medium for motives is knowledge : an intellect is accord<br />

ingly needed for susceptibility to motives. The true<br />

characteristic of the animal is therefore the faculty of<br />

knowing, of representing (Das Vorstelleri). Animals, as<br />

such, always move towards some aim and end, which<br />

therefore must have been recognised by them : that is to<br />

say, it must have presented<br />

itself to them as some<br />

thing different from themselves, yet of which they are<br />

conscious. Therefore the proper definition of the animal<br />

would be : That which knows ; for no other definition<br />

quite hits the mark or can even perhaps<br />

stand the test of<br />

investigation. Movement induced by motives is necessarily<br />

wanting where there is no cognitive faculty, and movement<br />

by stimuli alone remains, i.e. plant life. Irritability and<br />

sensibility are therefore inseparable. Still motives evi<br />

dently act in a different way from stimuli ;<br />

for the action<br />

of the former may be very brief, nay, need only be<br />

momentary; since their efficacy, unlike that of stimuli,<br />

stands in no relation whatever to the duration of that<br />

action, to the proximity of the object, &c. &c. A motive<br />

needs but to be perceived therefore, to take effect whereas<br />

;<br />

stimuli always require outward, often even inward, contact<br />

and invariably a certain length of time.<br />

This short sketch of the three forms of causality will<br />

suffice here. They are more fully described in my Prize-<br />

1<br />

essay on Free Will. One thing, however, still remains to<br />

be urged. The difference between cause, stimulus, and<br />

motive, is obviously only a consequence of the various<br />

degrees of receptivity of beings ; the greater their recepti<br />

vity, the feebler may be the nature of the influence : a stone<br />

needs an impact, while man obeys a look. Nevertheless,<br />

both are moved by a sufficient cause, therefore with the<br />

1 See<br />

&quot; Die beiden Grunclprobleme der Etkik,&quot; p. 30-34.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!