13.02.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FIRST CLASS OF OBJECTS FOE THE SUBJECT. 103<br />

Kant says, Time cannot be perceived ;<br />

x<br />

therefore no suc<br />

cession of representations can be empirically perceived as<br />

objective : i.e. can be distinguished as changes in pheno<br />

mena from the changes of mere subjective representations.<br />

The causal law, being a rule according to which states<br />

follow one another, is the only means by which the ob<br />

jectivity of a change can be known. Now, the result of<br />

his assertion would be, that no succession in Time could<br />

be perceived by us as objective, excepting that of cause<br />

and effect, and that every other succession of phenomena<br />

we perceive, would only be determined so, and not other<br />

wise, by our own will. In contradiction to all this I must<br />

adduce the fact, that it is quite possible for phenomena to<br />

follow upon one another without following from one another.<br />

Nor is the law of causality by any means prejudiced by<br />

for it remains certain that each change is the effect<br />

this ;<br />

of another change, this being firmly established a priori ;<br />

only each change not only follows upon the single one<br />

which is its cause, but upon all the other changes which<br />

occur simultaneously with that cause, and with which that<br />

cause stands in no causal connection whatever. It is not<br />

perceived by me exactly in the regular order of causal<br />

succession, but in quite a different order, which is, how<br />

ever, no less objective on that account, and which differs<br />

widely from any subjective succession depending on my<br />

caprice, such as, for instance, the pictures of my imagina<br />

tion. The succession, in Time, of events which stand in<br />

no causal connection with each other is precisely what we<br />

call contingency. 1<br />

Just as I am leaving my house, a tile<br />

happens to fall from the roof which strikes me ; now, there<br />

is no causal connection whatever between my going out and<br />

1 In German Zufall, a word derived from the Zusammenfallen (falling<br />

together), Zusammentreffen (meeting together), or coinciding of what is<br />

unconnected, just as TO avpfitfiriKos from avufiaiveiv. (Compare Aris<br />

&quot;<br />

totle, Anal, post.,&quot; i. 4.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!