13.02.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

128 THE FOURFOLD ROOT. [CHAP. Y.<br />

Sarisberriensis in the twelfth century, for he declares in<br />

his prologue,<br />

&quot;<br />

quia Logicce suscepi patrocinium, Metalogicus<br />

mscriptus est liber,&quot; and never makes use of the word again.<br />

There are only four metalogically true judgments of this<br />

sort, which were discovered long ago by induction, and<br />

called the laws of all thinking ; although entire uniformity<br />

of opinion as to their expression and even as to their<br />

number has not yet been arrived at, whereas all agree<br />

perfectly as to what they are on the whole meant to indi<br />

cate. They are the following :<br />

1. A subject is equal to the sum total of its predicates,<br />

or a = a.<br />

2. No predicate can be attributed and denied to a sub<br />

ject at the same time, or a = a = o.<br />

3. One of two opposite, contradictory predicates must<br />

belong to every subject.<br />

4. Truth is the reference of a judgment to something<br />

outside of it, as its sufficient reason.<br />

It is by means of a kind of reflection which I am in<br />

clined to call Reason s self-examination, that we know that<br />

these judgments express the conditions of all thinking,<br />

and therefore have these conditions for their reason.<br />

For, by<br />

the fruitlessness of its endeavours to think in<br />

opposition to these laws, our Eeason acknowledges them<br />

to be the conditions of all possible thinking : we then find<br />

out, that it is just as impossible to think in opposition<br />

to them, as it is to move the members of our body in a<br />

contrary direction to their joints. If it were possible for<br />

the subject to know itself, these laws would be known to<br />

us immediately, and we should not need to try experi<br />

ments with them on objects, i.e. representations. In this<br />

respect it is just the same with the reasons of judgments<br />

which have transcendental truth ; for they do not either<br />

come into our consciousness immediately, but only in<br />

concreto, by means of objects, i.e. of representations. In

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!