13.02.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116 THE FOURFOLD BOOT. [CHAP. V.<br />

able to think the rest by itself. To conceive therefore, is<br />

to think less than we perceive. If, after considering divers<br />

objects of perception, we drop something different belong<br />

ing to each, yet retain what is the same in all, the result<br />

will be the genus of that species. The generic conception<br />

is accordingly always the conception of every species<br />

comprised under it, after deducting all that does not<br />

belong to every species. Now, as every possible concep<br />

tion may be thought as a genus, a conception is always<br />

something general, and as such, not perceptible. Every<br />

conception has on this account also its sphere, as the sum-<br />

total l of what may be thought under it. The higher we<br />

ascend in abstract thought, the more we deduct, the less<br />

therefore remains to be thought. The highest, i.e. the<br />

most general conceptions, are the emptiest and poorest, and<br />

at last become mere husks, such as, for instance, being,<br />

essence, thing, becoming, &c. &c. Of what avail, by the<br />

way, can philosophical systems be, which are only spun out<br />

of conceptions of this sort and have for their substance<br />

mere flimsy husks of thoughts like these ? They must of<br />

necessity be exceedingly empty, poor, and therefore also<br />

dreadfully tiresome.<br />

Now as representations, thus sublimated and analysed<br />

to form abstract conceptions, have, as we have said, forfeited<br />

all perceptibility, they would entirely escape our conscious<br />

ness, and be of no avail to it for the thinking processes to<br />

which they are destined, were they not fixed and retained<br />

in our senses by arbitrary signs. These signs are words.<br />

In as far as they constitute the contents of dictionaries<br />

and therefore of language, words always designate general<br />

representations, conceptions, never perceptible objects ;<br />

whereas a lexicon which enumerates individual things, only<br />

contains proper names, not words, and is either a geo-<br />

1<br />

Inbegriff.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!