13.02.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 THE FOURFOLD HOOT. [CHAP. II.<br />

alriai tie. refftrapEQ pia pev TO n ?iv elvai pia. tie TO nvwv OVTUV,<br />

dvajKr) TOVTO etvat tripa. tie, ij TL TT/OUITOV tKivijtre TtTaprr) ce,<br />

TO TIVOQ eviKa. 1<br />

(Causes autem quatuor sunt: una quce<br />

explicat quid res sit ; alter a, quam, si qucedam sint, necesse<br />

est esse ; tertia, quce quid primum inovit ; quarta id, cujus<br />

gratia.) Now this is the origin of the division of the causes<br />

universally adopted by the Scholastic Philosophers, into<br />

causce materiales, formales, efficientes et finales, as may be<br />

seen in<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot; 2<br />

Suarii disputationes metaphysicae<br />

a real com<br />

pendium of Scholasticism. Even Hobbes still quotes and<br />

explains this division.3 It is also to be found in another<br />

passage of Aristotle, this time somewhat more clearly and<br />

fully developed (&quot;<br />

noticed in the book<br />

Metaph.&quot; i. 3.) and it is again briefly<br />

&quot; De somno et c. 2. As for the<br />

vigilia,&quot;<br />

vitally important distinction between reason and cause,<br />

however, Aristotle no doubt betrays something like a con<br />

ception of it in the<br />

considerable length that knowing and proving that a thing<br />

&quot;<br />

Analyt. post.&quot; i. 13, where he shows at<br />

exists is a very different thing from knowing and proving<br />

why it exists : what he represents as the latter, being know<br />

of the reason.<br />

ledge of the cause ; as the former, knowledge<br />

If, however, he had quite clearly recognized the difference<br />

between them, he would never have lost sight of it, but would<br />

have adhered to it throughout his writings. Now this is not<br />

the case ; for even when he endeavours to distinguish the<br />

various kinds of causes from one another, as in the passages<br />

I have mentioned above, the essential difference mooted in<br />

the chapter just alluded to, never seems to occur to him<br />

again. Besides he uses the term ainov indiscriminately<br />

for every kind of cause, often indeed calling reasons of know-<br />

1 &quot; There are four causes : first, the essence of a thing itself; second,<br />

the sine qua non of a thing j third, what first put a thing in motion ;<br />

fourth, to what purpose or end a thing is tending.&quot; [Tr. s add.]<br />

2 &quot;<br />

Suarii disputationes metaph.&quot; Disp. 12, sect. 2 et 3.<br />

Hobbes,<br />

&quot; De<br />

corpore,&quot; P. ii. c. 10, 7.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!