13.02.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FIRST CLASS OF OBJECTS FOE THE SUBJECT. 55<br />

same necessity. For motivation * is only causality pass<br />

ing through knowledge the intellect is the medium of the<br />

;<br />

motives, because it is the highest degree of receptivity. By<br />

this, however, the law of causality loses nothing whatever<br />

of its rigour and certainty; for motives are causes and<br />

operate with the same necessity which all causes bring<br />

with them. This necessity is easy to perceive in animals<br />

because of the greater simplicity of their intellect, which is<br />

limited to the perception of what is present. Man s in<br />

tellect is double : for not only has he intuitive, but abstract,<br />

knowledge, which last is not limited to what is present.<br />

Man possesses Reason he therefore has a ;<br />

power of elective<br />

decision with clear consciousness : that is, he is able to weigh<br />

against one another motives which exclude each other, as<br />

such in other ;<br />

terms, he can let them try their strength on<br />

his will. The most powerful motive then decides him, and<br />

his actions ensue with just the same necessity as the roll<br />

of a ball after it has been struck. Freedom of Will *<br />

ing<br />

means (not professorial twaddle but)<br />

&quot;<br />

that a given human<br />

being, in a given situation, can act in two different ways.&quot;<br />

But the utter absurdity of this assertion is a truth as<br />

certain and as clearly proved, as any truth can be which<br />

passes the limits of pure mathematics. In my Essay on<br />

Free Will, to which the Norwegian Society awarded the<br />

prize, this truth is demonstrated more clearly, methodi<br />

cally, and thoroughly than has been done before by anyone<br />

else, and this moreover with special reference to those<br />

facts of our consciousness by which ignorant people<br />

imagine that absurdity to be confirmed. In all that is<br />

essential however, Hobbes, Spinoza, Priestley, Yoltaire,<br />

1 The word &quot;motivation,&quot; though it may appear objectionable<br />

to the<br />

English reader, seemed unavoidable here, as being Schopenhauer s own<br />

term, for which there is no adequate equivalent in general use in our<br />

language. [Translator s note.]<br />

2 Here usedin theabsolute sense ofliberum arbitriumindiffercnticB. [Tr.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!