13.02.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FIRST CLASS OF OBJECTS FOR THE SUBJECT. 97<br />

I that is, the reflection of our own Understanding, the exter-<br />

I nalised image of its sole function ; and Matter is throughout<br />

I pure Causality, its essence is Action in general. 1<br />

This is<br />

S why pure Matter cannot be perceived, but can only be<br />

I thought : it is a something we add to every reality, as its<br />

S basis, in thinking it. For pure Causality, mere action, with-<br />

out any denned mode of action, cannot become perceptible,<br />

||<br />

S therefore it cannot come within any experience. Thus<br />

| Matter is only the objective correlate to pure Understand-<br />

I ing ; for it is Causality in general, and nothing else : just as<br />

I the Understanding itself is direct knowledge of cause and<br />

t effect, and nothing else. Now this again is precisely why<br />

B the law of causality is not applicable to Matter itself : that<br />

is to say, Matter has neither beginning nor end, but is and<br />

remains permanent. For as, on the one hand, Causality is<br />

the indispensable condition of all alternation in the acci<br />

dents (forms and qualities) of Matter, i.e. of all passage in<br />

and out of being ; but as, on the other hand, Matter is<br />

viewed : it is un<br />

pure Causality itself, as such, objectively<br />

able to exercise its own power upon itself, just as the eye<br />

can see everything but itself.<br />

&quot;<br />

Substance<br />

&quot;<br />

and Mattel<br />

being moreover identical, we may call Substance, action<br />

viewed in abstracto : Accidents, particular modes of action,<br />

action in concreto. Now these are the results to which true,<br />

i.e. transcendental, Idealism leads. In my chief work I have<br />

shown that the thing in itself i.e. whatever, on the whole,<br />

exists independently of our representation cannot be got<br />

at by way of representation, but that, to reach it, we must<br />

follow quite a different path, leading through the inside of<br />

things, which lets us into the citadel, as it were, by<br />

treachery.<br />

But it would be downright chicanery, nothing else, to<br />

1<br />

Compare<br />

&quot;<br />

Die Welt a. W. u. V.&quot; 2nd edition vol. i. sect. ; 4, p. 9 ;<br />

and vol. ii. pp. 48, 49 (3rd edition, vol. i. p. 10; vol. ii. p. 52). English<br />

translation, vol. i. pp. 9-10 j vol. ii. p. 218.<br />

H

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!