13.02.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

Download (PDF, 23.58MB) - Plurality Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52 THE FOTJEFOLD ROOT. [CHAP. IV.<br />

how the most heterogeneous natural forces successively<br />

come into play in them. By this explanation the difference<br />

between transitory phenomena and permanent forms of<br />

and as, moreover, a<br />

operation, becomes exceedingly clear ;<br />

whole section ( 26) is devoted to the question, it will be<br />

sufficient here to give a brief sketch of it. The rule, by<br />

which a force of Nature manifests itself in the chain of<br />

causes and effects consequently the link which connects it<br />

with them is the law of Nature. But the confusion<br />

between forces of Nature and causes is as frequent as it<br />

is detrimental to clearness of thought. It seems indeed<br />

as though no one had accurately defined the difference<br />

between these conceptions before me, however great may<br />

have been the urgency for such a distinction. Not only<br />

are forces of Nature turned into causes by such expres<br />

sions as, Electricity, Gravity, &c., are the cause of so-and-<br />

so, but they are even often turned into effects by those wlio<br />

&c., which<br />

search for a cause for Electricity, Gravity, &amp;lt;fec.<br />

is absurd. Diminishing the number of the forces of Nature,<br />

however, by reducing one to another, as for instance<br />

Magnetism is in our days reduced to Electricity,<br />

is a<br />

totally different thing. Every true, consequently really<br />

primary force of Nature and every fundamental chemical<br />

property belongs to these forces is essentially a qualitas<br />

occulta, i.e. it does not admit of physical, but only of<br />

metaphysical explanation : in other words, of an explana<br />

tion which transcends the world of phenomena. No one has<br />

carried this confusion, or rather identification, of causes<br />

with forces of Nature further than Maine de Biran in his<br />

&quot;Nouvelles considerations des rapports du physique au<br />

moral,&quot; for it is essential to his philosophy. It is besides<br />

remarkable, that when he speaks of causes, he rarely uses<br />

the word cause alone, but almost always speaks of cause<br />

ou force, just as we have seen Spinoza above (8) write ratio<br />

sive causa no less than eight times in the same page. Both

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!