Identificación y caracterización del granizo mediante el radar ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

BibliografíaKaňák, J., M. Benko, A. Simon y A. Sokol, 2007: Case study of the 9 May 2003 windstorm insouthwestern Slovakia. Atmos. Res., 83, 2-4, 162-175.Kaufman, L. y P.J. Rousseeuw, 1990. Finding groups in data: An introduction to clusteranalysis NY: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN: 0471878766.Keenan, T.D., 2003: Hydrometeor classification with a C-band polarimetric radar. AustralianMeteor. Mag., 52, n. 1, 23-31.Kessinger, C.J. y E.A. Brandes, 1995: A comparison of hail detection algorithms. Final report tothe FAA, 52pp.Kistler R. E. Kalnay, E., W. Collins, S. Saha, G. White, J. Woollen, M. Chelliah, W. Ebisuzaki,M. Kanamitsu, V. Kousky, H. van den Dool, R. Jenne y M. Fiorino, 2001: The NCEP–NCAR 50-Year Reanalysis: Monthly Means CDROM and Documentation, Bull. Am.Met. Soc., 82, 247–268.Kitzmiller, D.H., W.E. McGovern, y R.F. Saffle, 1995:The WSR-88D severe weather potentialalgorithm.Wea. Forecasting, 10, 141–159.Knight, C.A., P. Smith y C. Wade, 1982: Storm types and some radar reflectivitycharacteristics. The National Hail Research Experiment, P. Squires and C. A. Knight,Eds., Vol. 1, Hailstorms of the Central High Plains, Colorado Associated UniversityPress, 81–93.Knight, C.A., y N.M. Knight, 2001: Hailstorms. Severe Convective Storms. Meteor. Monogr.,28, 50, 223-254.Knight, C.A., y N.M. Knight, 2003: Hail and hailstorms. En: J.R. Holton, J.A. Curry y J.A.Pyle, (eds.): Encyclopedia of atmospheric sciences. Academic Press.Koppert, H.K., 2002: A Java based meteorological workstation, IIPS, AMS, 2002, xxx-xxx.http://ams.confex.com/ams/annual2002/18IIPS/abstracts/29502.htmKummerow, C., W. Barnes, T. Kozu, J. Shiue y J. Simpson, 1998: The Tropical RainfallMeasuring Mission (TRMM) Sensor Package. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 15, 809-817.LLee, R.R. y J.E. Passner, 1993: The Development and Verification of TIPS: An Expert Systemto Forecast Thunderstorm Occurrence. Wea. Forecasting, 8, 2, 271-280.Lenning, E., H.E. Fuelberg, y A.I. Watson, 1998: An evaluation of WSR-88D severe hailalgorithms along the northeastern Gulf Coast. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 1029-1044.Leone, D.A., R.M. Endlich, J. Petrieks, R.T.H. Collis y J.R. Porter, 1989: MeteorologicalConsiderations Used in Planning the NEXRAD Network. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 70,1, 4–13.Lim, S., V. Chandrasekar y V.N. Bringi, 2005: Hydrometeor classification system using dualpolarizationradar measurements: model improvements and in situ verification. IEEETrans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 43, n. 4, 792-801.List, R. y E. P. Lozowski, 1970: Pressure perturbations and buoyancy in convective clouds. J.Atmos. Sci., 27, 168–170.Llasat, M.C., 2004: La vulnérabilité en Catalogne. Colloque SHF. Crues Méditerranéennes.Nimes, Juin 2004 (Publications S.H.F.), 29-34.212
Identificación y caracterización del granizo. Predicción de las células convectivasLlasat, M.C., M. Barriendos, A. Barrera y T. Rigo, 2005. Floods in Catalonia (NE Spain) sincethe 14th century. Climatological and meteorological aspects from historicaldocumentary sources and old instrumental records; J. Hydrol., 313, 32–47.Llasat, M.C., M. Ceperuelo y T. Rigo, 2007: Rainfall regionalization on the basis of theprecipitation convective features using a raingauge network and weather radarobservations. Atmos. Res., 83, 2-4, 415-426.López, J.M., 2007: A Mediterranean derecho: Catalonia (Spain), 17th August 2003. Atmos.Res., 83, 2-4, 272-283.López, L., 2003: Convección atmosférica severa: pronóstico e identificación de tormentas congranizo. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de León, Instituto de Medio Ambiente. 207 pp.López, L., J.L. Marcos, J.L. Sánchez A. Castro y R. Fraile, 2001: CAPE values and hailstormson northwestern Spain. Atmos. Res., 56, 147–160.López, R.E. y R.L. Holle, 1995: Lightning casualties and property damage in Colorado from1950 to 1991 based on Storm Data. Wea. Forecasting, 10, 114-126.MMacDonald, A.E. y J.S. Wakefield, 1996: WFO-Advanced: An AWIPS-like PrototypeForecaster Workstation. Preprints 12th International Conference on InteractiveInformation and Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology,Atlanta, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 190-193.Machado, L.A.T. y W.B. Rossow, 1993: Structural characteristics and radiative properties oftropical cloud clusters. Mon. Wea. Rev, 121, 3234–3260.Machado, L.A.T., W.B. Rossow, R.L. Guedes y A.W. Walker, 1998: Life cycle variations ofmesoscale convective systems over the Americas. Mon. Wea. Rev, 126, 1630–1654.Machado, L.A.T. y H. Laurent, 2004: The Convective System Area Expansion over Amazoniaand its Relationships with Convective System Life Duration and High-Level WindDivergence. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 714-725.Maddox, R. A., 1980: Mesoscale convective complexes. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 61, 1374–1387.Maddox, R.A., 1983: Large-scale meteorological conditions associated with midlatitude,mesoscale convective complexes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 111, 126-140.Maddox, R.A., F. Canova y L.R. Hoxit, 1980: Meteorological Characteristics of Flash FloodEvents over the Western United States. Mon. Wea. Rev., 108:11, 1866-1877.Maddox, R.A., D.M.Rodgers y K.W. Howard, 1982: Mesoscale convective complexes over theUnited States during 1981 - Annual Summary. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 1501-1514.Mariani, S., Casaioli, M., Accadia, C., Llasat, M. C. , Pasi, F., Davolio, S., Elementi, M., Ficca,G. y Romero, R., 2005: A limited area model intercomparison on the “Montserrat-2000” flash-flood event using statistical and deterministic methods, Nat. Hazards EarthSyst. Sci., 5, 583–592.Markowski, P., 2005a: An overview of Atmospheric Convection. Atmospheric ConvectionCourse. Udine, Italy, 18th-22th July.Markowski, P., 2005b: Convective Storm Initiation and Organization. Atmospheric ConvectionCourse. Udine, Italy, 18th-22th July.213
Page 6 and 7:
Índice4.4 Los radiosondeos .......
Page 10 and 11:
Agradecimientos / AgraïmentsTota a
Page 12 and 13:
Resumenobteniendo una óptima estim
Page 14:
Abstractresults the relationships b
Page 17 and 18:
Identificación y caracterización
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39:
Page 42 and 43:
El granizoEn cuanto a su forma, el
Page 44 and 45:
El granizo• La formación de las
Page 46 and 47:
El granizoFigura 3.5 Vista esquemá
Page 48 and 49:
El granizo3.5 Órdenes de magnitudL
Page 50 and 51:
El granizo(171 km/h), en este caso
Page 52 and 53:
El granizoFigura 3.8 Tamaño máxim
Page 54 and 55:
El granizo• Una escala muy sofist
Page 56 and 57:
El granizoEn resumen, existen una g
Page 58 and 59:
El granizodistribución espacial de
Page 60 and 61:
El granizola zona del Valle del Ebr
Page 62 and 63:
El granizo• Una extensión de las
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113:
Page 116 and 117:
Las campañas de observación de gr
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Situaciones con y sin granizo y det
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 177 and 178: Identificación y caracterización
Page 193: Identificación y caracterización
Page 196 and 197: Conclusionesexistentes se han mostr
Page 198 and 199: Conclusioneslugar en ella sean de d
Page 200 and 201: Conclusiones9.4 Las campañas exper
Page 202 and 203: Conclusionesla incidencia perpendic
Page 204 and 205: Conclusionessubjetivas, cometiendo
Page 206 and 207: Conclusionesrelacionados con las di
Page 208 and 209: Conclusiones9.7 La predicción de l
Page 210 and 211: Conclusionesdetectándose variacion
Page 212 and 213: Conclusiones• La organización de
Page 220 and 221: BibliografíaAugustine, J.A. y K.W.
Page 222 and 223: BibliografíaDDas, P., 1979: A non-
Page 224 and 225: BibliografíaGGalletti, M., P.P. Al
Page 228 and 229: BibliografíaMarkowski, P., 2005c:
Page 230 and 231: BibliografíaPierce, C.E., P.J. Har
Page 232 and 233: BibliografíaStumpf, G.J., T.M. Smi
Page 244 and 245: Índice de tablasTabla. 7.4 Diferen
Page 246: AcrónimosMUL - Sistema Multicelula
show all

Identificación y caracterización del granizo mediante el radar ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?