Identificación y caracterización del granizo mediante el radar ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

BibliografíaPierce, C.E., P.J. Hardaker, C.G. Collier y C.M. Haggett, 2000: GANDOLF: a system forgenerating automated nowcasts of convective precipitation. Meteorol. Appl., 7, 4, 341-360.Porter, D., M.R. Kramar y S.D. Landolt, 2005: Predicting Severe Hail for the Southern HighPlains and West Texas. 32nd Conference on Radar Meteorology, 22-29 de octubre,Albuquerque, NM.Pruppacher, H.R. y J.D. Klett, 1978: Microphysics of clouds and precipitation. D. ReidelPublishers, Dordrecht, 714pp.Purdom, J.F.W., 1982: Subjective interpretation of geostationary satellite data for nowcasting.Nowcasting, K. Browning, Ed., Academic Press, 149–162.RRagette, G., 1973: Mesoscale Circulations Associated with Alberta Hailstorms, Mon. Wea.Rev., 101, 150–159.Raymond, D.J. y M.H. Wilkening, 1982: Flow and mixing in New Mexico mountain cumuli. J.Atmos. Sci., 39, 2211–2228.Rigo, T., 2004: Estudio de Sistemas Convectivos Mesoscalares en la zona MediterráneaOccidental Mediante el uso del Radar Meteorológico. Tesis doctoral. Universidad deBarcelona.Rigo, T. y M.C. Llasat, 2004: A methodology of convective structures using meteorologicalradar: application to heavy rainfall events on the Mediterranean coast of the IberianPeninsula, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 59–68.Rigo, T. y M.C. Llasat, 2005: Radar analysis of the life cycle of Mesoscale Convective Systemsduring the 10 June 2000 event. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 959–970.Rinehart, R. y E. Garvey, 1978: Three-dimensional storm motion detection by conventionalweather radar. Nature, 273, 287–289.Roeseler, C. A., y L. Wood, 1997: VIL density and associated hail size along the NorthwestGulf Coast. Preprints, 28th Conf. On Radar Meteorology, Austin, Texas, Amer. Meteor.Soc., 434-435.Romero, R., A. Martín, V. Homar, S. Alonso y C. Ramis, 2005: Predictability of prototype flashflood events in theWesternMediterranean under uncertainties of the precursor upperleveldisturbance: the HYDROPTIMET case studies, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5,505–525.Ryzhkov, A.V., T.J. Schuur, D.W. Burgess, P.L. Heinselman, S.E. Giangrande y D.S. Zrnić,2005: The Joint Polarization Experiment. Polarimetric rainfall measurements andhydrometeor classification. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 809-824.SSan Ambrosio, I., 2005: Módulo para la estimación de granizo basado en datos radar.NotaTécnica STAP nº 44, 52 pp.Sánchez, J.L., 2004: Severe Storms in Spain. Workshop on Severe Convective Storms, 8 deNoviembre de 2004, León, España.216
Identificación y caracterización del granizo. Predicción de las células convectivasSánchez, J.L., E. García Ortega y J.L. Marcos, 2001: Construction and assessment of a logisticregression model applied to short-term forecasting of thunderstorms in León (Spain).Atmos. Res., 56, 1-4, 57-71.Sánchez, J.L., J.L. Marcos, M.T. de la Fuente, A. Castro, 1998: A logistic regression modelapplied to short term forecast of hail risk. Phys. Chem. Earth, 23, 5-6, 645-648.Sánchez, J.L., M.V. Fernández, J.T. Fernández, E. Tudurí y C. Ramis, 2003: Analysis ofmesoscale convective systems with hail precipitation. Atmos. Res., 67-68, 573-588.Sánchez, J.L., R. Fraile, M.T. de la Fuente, P. Rodríguez y A. Castro, 1996: Crop damage: thehail size factor. J. Appl. Meteor., 35, 1535-1541Sánchez-Diezma, R., 2001: Optimización de la medida de lluvia por radar meteorológico parasu aplicación hidrológica, Tesis Doctoral, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, 313.Scaranari, D., F.S. Marzano, G. Vulpiani, M. Montopoli, M. Celano y P.P. Alberoni, 2006:Hydrometeor supervised classification using a bistatic C-band weather radarconfiguration. Proceedings of European radar conference ERAD 2006.Schaefer, J.T., 1986: Severe thunderstorm forecasting. A historical perspective. Wea.Forecasting, 1, 164-189.Schleusener, R.A. y P.C. Jenings, 1960: An energy method for relative estimates of hailintensity. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 41, 372-376Schmid,W., H.H. Schiesser y A. Waldvogel, 1992: The kinetic energy of hailfalls: Part IV.Patterns of hailpad and radar data. J. Appl. Meteorol. 31, 1165–1178.Schuster, S.S., R.J. Blong y M.S. Speer, 2005: A hail climatology of the greater Sydney areaand New South Wales, Australia. Int. J. Climatol., 25, 1633–1650.Seo, D.-J., S. Perica, E. Welles y J.C. Schaake, 2000: Simulation of precipitation fields fromprobabilistic quantitative precipitation forecast. J. Hydrol., 239, 203–229.Setvák, M, 2004. Multispectral observations of convective storms. EUMETSAT workshop onSevere Convective Storms, León (Spain), 08 November 2004.Sioutas, M.V. y H.A. Flocas, 2003: Hailstorms in Northern Greece: synoptic patterns andthermodynamic environment. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 75, 189–202.Smart, J.R., y R.L. Alberty, 1985: The NEXRAD Hail Algorithm Applied to ColoradoThunderstorms, 14th co@ on Severe Local Storms CAMS), 244-247.Smith, E.J., 1974: Cloud seeding in Australia. Weather and climate modification, Ed W.D.Hess, Wiley&Sons, NY, 842pp.Smith, P., 2004: The hail problem. Workshop on Severe Convective Storms. León (Spain) 8thNovember 2004.Sousa, R., 1987: Notas para una climatología de Lérida. Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia.Steiner, M., R.A. Houze Jr. y S.E. Yutter, 1995: Climatological Characterization of Three-Dimensional Storm Structure from Operational Radar and Rain Gage Data. J. App.Met., 34, 9, 1978-2007.Straka, J.M., D.S. Zrnić, y A.V. Ryzhkov, 2000: Bula hydrometeor classification andquantification using polarimetric radar data: synthesis of relations. J. Appl. Met., 39, 8,1341-1372.Strong, G.S. y E.P. Lozowski, 1977: An Alberta study to objectively measure hailfall intensity.Atmosphere, 15, 33-53.217
Page 6 and 7:
Índice4.4 Los radiosondeos .......
Page 10 and 11:
Agradecimientos / AgraïmentsTota a
Page 12 and 13:
Resumenobteniendo una óptima estim
Page 14:
Abstractresults the relationships b
Page 17 and 18:
Identificación y caracterización
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39:
Page 42 and 43:
El granizoEn cuanto a su forma, el
Page 44 and 45:
El granizo• La formación de las
Page 46 and 47:
El granizoFigura 3.5 Vista esquemá
Page 48 and 49:
El granizo3.5 Órdenes de magnitudL
Page 50 and 51:
El granizo(171 km/h), en este caso
Page 52 and 53:
El granizoFigura 3.8 Tamaño máxim
Page 54 and 55:
El granizo• Una escala muy sofist
Page 56 and 57:
El granizoEn resumen, existen una g
Page 58 and 59:
El granizodistribución espacial de
Page 60 and 61:
El granizola zona del Valle del Ebr
Page 62 and 63:
El granizo• Una extensión de las
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113:
Page 116 and 117:
Las campañas de observación de gr
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Situaciones con y sin granizo y det
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180: Identificación y caracterización
Page 193: Identificación y caracterización
Page 196 and 197: Conclusionesexistentes se han mostr
Page 198 and 199: Conclusioneslugar en ella sean de d
Page 200 and 201: Conclusiones9.4 Las campañas exper
Page 202 and 203: Conclusionesla incidencia perpendic
Page 204 and 205: Conclusionessubjetivas, cometiendo
Page 206 and 207: Conclusionesrelacionados con las di
Page 208 and 209: Conclusiones9.7 La predicción de l
Page 210 and 211: Conclusionesdetectándose variacion
Page 212 and 213: Conclusiones• La organización de
Page 220 and 221: BibliografíaAugustine, J.A. y K.W.
Page 222 and 223: BibliografíaDDas, P., 1979: A non-
Page 224 and 225: BibliografíaGGalletti, M., P.P. Al
Page 226 and 227: BibliografíaKaňák, J., M. Benko,
Page 228 and 229: BibliografíaMarkowski, P., 2005c:
Page 232 and 233: BibliografíaStumpf, G.J., T.M. Smi
Page 244 and 245: Índice de tablasTabla. 7.4 Diferen
Page 246: AcrónimosMUL - Sistema Multicelula
show all

Identificación y caracterización del granizo mediante el radar ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?