25.12.2012 Views

“La gestión de recursos: Sustentabilidad y ética” XI ... - nemac

“La gestión de recursos: Sustentabilidad y ética” XI ... - nemac

“La gestión de recursos: Sustentabilidad y ética” XI ... - nemac

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONCEPTUAL REVIEW<br />

Aspects of modal shift<br />

In this article are consi<strong>de</strong>red the main regional <strong>de</strong>velopment and geography of<br />

transportation, proposed by Rodrigue; Comtois; Slack (1999), Blauwens et al. (2006)<br />

examines the influence of total logistics costs and Ogawa (2004) emphasis on the<br />

environmental benefit, consi<strong>de</strong>ring that the exchange of modal will reduce the emission of<br />

carbon dioxi<strong>de</strong>, Geerts (2002) <strong>de</strong>als on the market for modal shift in intermodal transport.<br />

Bravo (2000) refers to the multimodality, focusing on theory of cost transshipment port.<br />

Geerts (2002) proposes the adoption of IPI (Intermodality potential in<strong>de</strong>x) which<br />

measures the intermodality potential from the equation of division between potential and<br />

current market of the intermodal transport, which influential factors are: transfer costs; door<br />

to door <strong>de</strong>livery time; frequency; information tracking (<strong>de</strong>lays); reliability; distance.<br />

Rodrigue; Comtois; Slack (1999) take it that the analysis factors inclu<strong>de</strong> the distance<br />

but inclu<strong>de</strong> also the logistics costs and available modal options, as laid out below.<br />

Consequently, they <strong>de</strong>fend a holistic analysis for the <strong>de</strong>cision making progress, meaning<br />

analyzing the distance, operational logistics costs and finally choose the modal options.<br />

Picture 1: The principles of modal shift<br />

Source: Adapted from Rodrigue; Comtois; Slack (1999)<br />

As per Jolic; Strk; Lesic (2007) the distance is the main factor for the <strong>de</strong>cision of<br />

adoption of intermodality consi<strong>de</strong>ring that the strategic planning can only be <strong>de</strong>fined from the<br />

geographical position of the port up to the hinterland. According to the authors, what is<br />

<strong>de</strong>cisive for the port situation are the high additional transport costs (caused by the difference<br />

between the minimum and maximum distances of transport) which are complementary or<br />

contrary to the cargo transfer costs in the ports, i.e., the strategic positioning can be adopted<br />

as a tool for analysis of the port competitiveness, which also <strong>de</strong>pends on the infra-structure<br />

for the <strong>de</strong>finition of modals and the modal transfer as a whole.<br />

The strategic planning can be adopted as a analysis instrument of port<br />

competitiveness combined with the infrastructure to <strong>de</strong>fine mo<strong>de</strong> and modal shift. To<br />

Rodrigue; Comtois; Slack (1999) the modal transfer occurs when a modal (a) has a<br />

comparative advantage on another (b) in a similar market. The competitive advantages are<br />

202

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!