Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSIS 100 This is in part simply compositional; it can largely be understood as inheriting eye, and adding the restrictions that the seen is text or graphical material (hence not inheriting read), and the verb must appear in the imperative. But there is also typically a compressed, \telegraphic" style in the clause (e.g. See chart, p. 37.) and apparently a rather limited set of nouns that can express the seen: page, section, chapter, appendix, chart, table, diagram, etc. These facts, taken together, suggest that it should be regarded as a sense in its own right. Compositional Uses Sense AUDIENCE (54) a. The doctor will see you now. b. The King will see the Ambassador tomorrow. c. Mrs. Riggs-Aston will see no-one today. This is visit with the further restriction that the seer is of higher social rank than the seen, meaning something like `grantaninterview to'. 14 The di erence in social rank may be con ned to the particular situation in question; e.g. a millionaire or a state governor may have towait until the doctor is ready to see him or her. The syntax of seer and seen are the inverse of those of consult, yet something more formal than a simple social interaction (i.e., visit) is usually intended. Stereotypically a set phrase used by receptionists (Ex. (54-a)), it also occurs in more varied syntax and social settings (Ex. (54-b), (54-c)). In the last case, there is not necessarily a great di erence in social rank between the hostess and her guests, but the situation is so formal, that the decision not to see anyoneforaday is clearly the hostess' prerogative. 14 This is one of the places where the use of common words as names of senses may unfortunately cause some confusion. The sense visit is by de nition reciprocal, since it uses (indirectly) reciprocal event. Therefore, it is correct to say that audience is just a further restriction on the social ranks of the participants. But the ordinary verb visit has a speci c directionality, which happens to run counter to the facts for the sense audience. Mrs. Riggs-Aston stays at home and people come to visit her, she does not go to visit them, in the ordinary sense of the word visit. But when they come to her house, they see (sense visit) each other, and because it is such an unequal relationship, we can say that she sees (sense audience) them; they do not see (sense audience) her.
CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSIS 101 Sense DISCOURSE cognition inchoative see discourse Frame see discourse type event Uses cognition inchoative [ci] 2 3 roles: seerhuman = 6 6seen = 4 discourse context ci.Cognizer 7 ci.Content 7 5 val: 82 >< 6 4 >: 82 >< 6 4 >: role seer syn DA person 2 role seer syn DA person 1 39 7>= 7 5 >; 39 7>= 7 5 >; (55) a. Brown: As we have seen, Methodism early took a stand against slavery. b. Brown: Second, we willseehow Sidney answered the charges, . . . . c. As seen in Chapter 3, the war did not unfold as the General Sta had planned. d. You'll see that this is necessary when I come back to this point inafewminutes. e. As the reader will see in the following section, . . . The seer is rst or second person, the seen is a situation, and there is a reference, either direct or indirect to the (written or spoken) discourse context. This may bemarked simply on the verb, using past or perfect for discourse up to the present, or future for following parts of the discourse, (Ex. (55-a), Ex. (55-b)) oritmay be more explicit, as in Ex. (55-c) and Ex. (55-d). A wide range of registers is possible; in casual conversation, Isee is a complete
Page 1 and 2:
Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psy
Page 3 and 4:
Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psy
Page 5 and 6:
Next three psycholinguistic experim
Page 7 and 8:
BasicSenses........................
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements Careful citations
Page 11 and 12:
acquisition. Aside from needing to
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 Introduction Xue er bu s,
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 3 In lingui
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 5 Although
Page 19 and 20:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 7 part on t
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 9 is not cl
Page 23 and 24:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 11 1980:10-
Page 25 and 26:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 13 L.U. Lex
Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 15 spondenc
Page 29 and 30:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 17 happy an
Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 19 shows th
Page 33 and 34:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 21 Regular
Page 35 and 36:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 23 base for
Page 37 and 38:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 25 d. The i
Page 39 and 40:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 27 (12) a.
Page 41 and 42:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 29 linguist
Page 43 and 44:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 31 Introspe
Page 45 and 46:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 33 on the o
Page 47 and 48:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 35 they con
Page 49 and 50:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 37 meaning
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 2 A Frame Semantic Analysis
Page 53 and 54:
CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSI
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62: CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSI
Page 111: CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSI
Page 123 and 124: Chapter 3 Other Cognitive Approache
Page 125 and 126: CHAPTER 3. OTHER COGNITIVE APPROACH
Page 139 and 140: Semantics of Seer entity setting ph
Page 145 and 146: CHAPTER 4. PSYCHOLINGUISTIC EXPERIM
Page 163 and 164:
CHAPTER 4. PSYCHOLINGUISTIC EXPERIM
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
CHAPTER 5. WHAT THE DICTIONARIES SA
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
CHAPTER 6. FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIO
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 239 Bierwisch, Manfred
Page 253 and 254:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 241 ||, & B.T.S. Atkin
Page 255 and 256:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 243 ||. 1990. The inva
Page 257 and 258:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 245 Osgood, C.E. 1970.
Page 259 and 260:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 247 Wasow, Thomas. 198
Page 261 and 262:
Appendix A Additional Corpus Exampl
Page 263 and 264:
APPENDIX A. ADDITIONAL CORPUS EXAMP
Page 265 and 266:
APPENDIX A. ADDITIONAL CORPUS EXAMP
Page 267 and 268:
APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF MORPHOLOGY A
Page 269 and 270:
APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 257 Recogn
Page 271 and 272:
APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 259 to lea
Page 273 and 274:
APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 261 At the
Page 275 and 276:
Appendix D Stimuli for Experiments
Page 277 and 278:
APPENDIX D. STIMULI FOR EXPERIMENTS
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Index activation, 13, 136, 137, 231
Page 289 and 290:
INDEX 277 description, 82 see proce
Page 291:
INDEX 279 173{178, 186, 190{192, 20
show all

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?