22.03.2013 Views

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 5. WHAT THE DICTIONARIES SAY 206<br />

Included in (401-f) are setting (401-f-i) <strong>and</strong> three examples of experience, all of<br />

which are idiomatic in di erent ways, <strong>and</strong> none of which involve the usual direct objects for<br />

this sense, such ascombat, use, service, etc. Although the rst two translations given, miru<br />

<strong>and</strong> mokugeki suru both involve physical vision, only one of the examples does (401-f-ii);<br />

the last two translations will t most examples of this sense better.<br />

Most of the examples in (401-g) are of discourse or recognize. (401-g-vi) <strong>and</strong><br />

(401-g-vii) appear to be obsolete slang. The worst example of this is found in (401-p),<br />

meaning `to bribe', which also appears in the OED entry for see, which in turn cites a<br />

1911 edition of Webster's Dictionary! (401-g-iv) is an instance of classify; this sense is<br />

scattered across the sub-entries, e.g. (401-h) contains one example of recognize <strong>and</strong> two of<br />

classify, which participate in a larger pattern to be discussed below.<br />

Sub-entry (401-i) provides the clearest cases of miru, where the pragmatics of the<br />

situations requires active looking. (401-j) is our determine, (401-k) ensure, <strong>and</strong> (401-m)<br />

accompany. In (401-l), the rst three examples have to do with making judgements, <strong>and</strong><br />

can probably be considered classify even though they are not of the patterns see X as Y<br />

or see Y in X . (401-l-iv) is wonderfully ambiguous <strong>and</strong> deserves its own discussion along<br />

with the collocation see about it (403-j); bothhave many uses depending on pragmatics.<br />

Example (401-n-i) is probably envision, but could be recognize if we believe<br />

that poets see a reality that most people overlook.<br />

Most of the \intransitive" sub-entries have already been discussed in passing, so<br />

we will only note a few more points here. (402-b) consists mainly of examples of recog-<br />

nize; the null instantiation of the seen means that many of them refer to the immediate<br />

context, especially the discourse context, <strong>and</strong> so they can be further categorized as dis-<br />

course. (402-c) is really a combination of see through <strong>and</strong> see into. (402-f) also seems to<br />

be determine, like (402-e); (402-g) is apparently an error|at least it is not acceptable or<br />

familiar to any of the American or British speakers I have consulted.<br />

One might quibble about some of the more obscure collocations that have been<br />

included, such as (403-f) <strong>and</strong> (403-s), but at least a fair selection has been made from the<br />

hundreds which could have beenchosen. See the old year out <strong>and</strong> the new year in (403-n)<br />

is found here (<strong>and</strong> in some other bilingual dictionaries) but not in the much larger W3NI.<br />

It is odd to nd see here (403-m) agged as \American", since it seems at least as common<br />

in British English as in American.<br />

In summary, the Kenkyusha treatment ofsee is remarkably complete <strong>and</strong>, except

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!