Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSIS 106 see one's way clear (61) a. I hope you will see your way clear to give ittoher. To come to the conclusion that one can (or should) do something. This is a very xed metaphorical extension from the experience of walking on a path and seeing the path ahead. see fit (62) a. Pat had it for a week before seeing t to tell me about it. b. You can handle the situation however you see t. c. They never saw t to visit us until we moved to Hawai'i. d. You can sell it or hang on to it as you see t. e. Brown: \I should . . . be honored and grati ed should the Democrats see t to nominate me." The seer is a conscious being, seen a to-in nitive. In the basic syntactic pattern (seer sees t to B), the subject of the in nitive phrase is the subject of see, sowe can regard this sense as a verb of the type exempli ed by endeavor, fail, refuse, anddare, which undergo what has been called Subject-Equi-NP-deletion, but do not allow the alternative in which the embedded verb has a di erent subject marked with for, asshown below: (63) Ms. Ding hated [for Ms. Ding] to go out with Igor. for Natasha saw t [for Ms. Ding] for Natasha The seen must involve a process, not a pure stative ( They saw t to live in Spain for ve years). There is another common syntactic pattern with a free relative, (They can exercise their stock option whenever they see t), which blocks the extraction. see fit may be related to classify (i.e. see X as tting) orcondition (i.e. see X tting, where tting functions as an AP). see fit is often used ironically, implying that someone's actions are grudging and slowed by sel shness. Heather Jones (p.c.) has noted that there is a similar expression in Welsh, equivalent to `please', that means literally `if you see well'.
CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSIS 107 see off (64) a. Ihave to go to the airport tomorrow to see my brother o . b. Sorry I won't be able to see you o to France, but bon voyage, anyway. c. We went to the airport to see them o on their trip to Hawai'i. d. The entire family came to the station to see o Francesca and her sister. e. Brown: After a dinner party for which she had come down to New York, Mrs. Lewis and Casanova arrived to see them o , . . . To be present at the time of leave-taking on a journey in order to wish someone a good trip. seer and seen are both human. This sense is often followed by adjuncts giving the location of the leave-taking and/or the path of the journey. see reason (65) I hope they'll see reason before things get ugly. This means to come to what the speaker regards as a reasonable position, i.e., his or her own; variations include the (cool) light of reason, etc. see through x (66) a. She soon saw through his bluster and realized that he was actually afraid of what she might know about him. b. The very rich are targets for all sorts of con games and often become skilled at seeing through them. c. I didn't see through the con man in time. The seer comes to recognize the reality underlying some false impression which has been deliberately created. The seer is a human, the seen is almost always null instantiated, and the object of the PPthrough is some kind of deception or, metonymically, a person who deceives, as in Ex. (66-c). This use is only distantly related to see x through; there, the metaphorical motion is through some process, extended in time. Here, the gaze itself is what moves, from the seer through the deception, to the reality that lies \behind" it. The entire sense is a metaphorical mapping from the physical domain (She couldn't see through
Page 1 and 2:
Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psy
Page 3 and 4:
Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psy
Page 5 and 6:
Next three psycholinguistic experim
Page 7 and 8:
BasicSenses........................
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements Careful citations
Page 11 and 12:
acquisition. Aside from needing to
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 Introduction Xue er bu s,
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 3 In lingui
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 5 Although
Page 19 and 20:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 7 part on t
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 9 is not cl
Page 23 and 24:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 11 1980:10-
Page 25 and 26:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 13 L.U. Lex
Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 15 spondenc
Page 29 and 30:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 17 happy an
Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 19 shows th
Page 33 and 34:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 21 Regular
Page 35 and 36:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 23 base for
Page 37 and 38:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 25 d. The i
Page 39 and 40:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 27 (12) a.
Page 41 and 42:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 29 linguist
Page 43 and 44:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 31 Introspe
Page 45 and 46:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 33 on the o
Page 47 and 48:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 35 they con
Page 49 and 50:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 37 meaning
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 2 A Frame Semantic Analysis
Page 53 and 54:
CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSI
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68: CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSI
Page 117: CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSI
Page 123 and 124: Chapter 3 Other Cognitive Approache
Page 125 and 126: CHAPTER 3. OTHER COGNITIVE APPROACH
Page 139 and 140: Semantics of Seer entity setting ph
Page 145 and 146: CHAPTER 4. PSYCHOLINGUISTIC EXPERIM
Page 169 and 170:
CHAPTER 4. PSYCHOLINGUISTIC EXPERIM
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
CHAPTER 5. WHAT THE DICTIONARIES SA
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
CHAPTER 6. FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIO
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 239 Bierwisch, Manfred
Page 253 and 254:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 241 ||, & B.T.S. Atkin
Page 255 and 256:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 243 ||. 1990. The inva
Page 257 and 258:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 245 Osgood, C.E. 1970.
Page 259 and 260:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 247 Wasow, Thomas. 198
Page 261 and 262:
Appendix A Additional Corpus Exampl
Page 263 and 264:
APPENDIX A. ADDITIONAL CORPUS EXAMP
Page 265 and 266:
APPENDIX A. ADDITIONAL CORPUS EXAMP
Page 267 and 268:
APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF MORPHOLOGY A
Page 269 and 270:
APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 257 Recogn
Page 271 and 272:
APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 259 to lea
Page 273 and 274:
APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 261 At the
Page 275 and 276:
Appendix D Stimuli for Experiments
Page 277 and 278:
APPENDIX D. STIMULI FOR EXPERIMENTS
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Index activation, 13, 136, 137, 231
Page 289 and 290:
INDEX 277 description, 82 see proce
Page 291:
INDEX 279 173{178, 186, 190{192, 20
show all

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?