Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5.4 English-Spanish Dictionaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180 Collins English-Spanish Dictionary|Text ................... 180 Collins English-Spanish Dictionary|Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 APocket Spanish-English Dictionary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 5.5 English-Mandarin and Mandarin-English Dictionaries ............ 187 Far East English-Chinese Dictionary|Text .................. 187 Far East English-Chinese Dictionary|Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 Everyday Chinese-English Dictionary|Text.................. 192 Everyday Chinese-English Dictionary|Discussion .............. 196 5.6 English-Japanese Dictionaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 Kenkyusha English-Japanese Dictionary|Text ................ 198 Kenkyusha English-Japanese Dictionary|Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 Small English-Japanese Dictionaries ...................... 207 5.7 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 English-English Comparisons of Entry Structure ............... 208 Cross-linguistic Comparisons of Entry Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 Cross-linguistic Comparisons of Translations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 5.8 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 Possible Alternative Organizations for Dictionary Entries .......... 227 6 Future Research Directions and Conclusions 228 6.1 Future Research Directions ........................... 228 Psycholinguistic Experiments .......................... 228 Corpus Studies and Word Sense Disambiguation ............... 230 Cross-linguistic Survey.............................. 232 Other Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 6.2 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 Bibliography 238 A Additional Corpus Examples of Senses 249 A.1 BasicSenses.................................... 249 A.2 Semi-collocations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 A.3 Compositional Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 B Summary of Morphology and Syntax of Senses 254 C Experiment 1 256 C.1 Original nineteen senses ............................. 256 C.2 Stimuli....................................... 259 Brown Corpus Sentences (selected) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259 Constructed Sentences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261 D Stimuli for Experiments 2 and 3 263 Index 275 v
Acknowledgements Careful citations are the standard academic way toshow the intellectual background of a work such as this, but they can never tell the whole story. The ideas in this dissertation have been developed with the bene t of many careful readings and thoughtful comments from all the members of my committee, and of extensive discussions with George Lako , Jane Edwards, Christopher R. Johnson, Susanne Gahl, Kevin Moore, and other faculty, postdocs, and graduate students at UC Berkeley. I began by trying to acknowledge each contribution by citing it as a personal communication, but soon found that there were too many tocount. I greatly appreciate all the suggestions that I have received and hope that those who see their ideas used here will not be disappointed by the lack of speci c reference. I feel fortunate to have participated in the life of the Linguistics Department at UC Berkeley, and to have received the intellectual stimulation of faculty such asPaul Kay, John Ohala, Jim Matiso , Larry Hyman, Leanne Hinton, Ian Maddieson, and Robin Lako and the encouragement of fellow linguistics students such as Sarah Taub, Joe Grady, Sara Gesuato, Matt Juge, Kyoko Hirose Ohara, Orhan Orgun, Laurel Sutton, Marvin Kramer, Jason Patent, Mary Bucholtz, Kathleen Hubbard, Anita Liang, and many others, including a distinguished series of colloquium speakers and visiting scholars. It has also been my good fortune during much ofmystayatBerkeley to be associated with the International Computer Science Institute (ICSI) and to have hadthechance to discuss natural language and cognitive science with researchers there such as Jerry Feldman, Dan Jurafsky, Terry Regier, David Bailey, and Srini Narayanan. I am grateful to the taxpayers of California for the Regents' Scholarship I received during my rstyears at Berkeley and to U.S. taxpayers for the NSF funding of the work of the FrameNet Project at ICSI (IRI 9618838, Charles Fillmore, PI), which has made it possible for me to be paid for work related to my dissertation research. Looking back athowIreached this point, I feel grateful to my parents for their concern for my education (to the point of helping to found a new school) and to a long succession of brilliant, dedicated teachers, too numerous to name. Above all,Iwant to thank my wife and my son (now three years old) for their support and patience throughout this long project. vi
Page 1 and 2: Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psy
Page 3 and 4: Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psy
Page 5 and 6: Next three psycholinguistic experim
Page 7: BasicSenses........................
Page 11 and 12: acquisition. Aside from needing to
Page 13 and 14: Chapter 1 Introduction Xue er bu s,
Page 15 and 16: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 3 In lingui
Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 5 Although
Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 7 part on t
Page 21 and 22: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 9 is not cl
Page 23 and 24: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 11 1980:10-
Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 13 L.U. Lex
Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 15 spondenc
Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 17 happy an
Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 19 shows th
Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 21 Regular
Page 35 and 36: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 23 base for
Page 37 and 38: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 25 d. The i
Page 39 and 40: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 27 (12) a.
Page 41 and 42: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 29 linguist
Page 43 and 44: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 31 Introspe
Page 45 and 46: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 33 on the o
Page 47 and 48: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 35 they con
Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 37 meaning
Page 51 and 52: Chapter 2 A Frame Semantic Analysis
Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSI
Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSI
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 3 Other Cognitive Approache
Page 125 and 126:
CHAPTER 3. OTHER COGNITIVE APPROACH
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Semantics of Seer entity setting ph
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
CHAPTER 4. PSYCHOLINGUISTIC EXPERIM
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
CHAPTER 5. WHAT THE DICTIONARIES SA
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
CHAPTER 6. FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIO
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 239 Bierwisch, Manfred
Page 253 and 254:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 241 ||, & B.T.S. Atkin
Page 255 and 256:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 243 ||. 1990. The inva
Page 257 and 258:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 245 Osgood, C.E. 1970.
Page 259 and 260:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 247 Wasow, Thomas. 198
Page 261 and 262:
Appendix A Additional Corpus Exampl
Page 263 and 264:
APPENDIX A. ADDITIONAL CORPUS EXAMP
Page 265 and 266:
APPENDIX A. ADDITIONAL CORPUS EXAMP
Page 267 and 268:
APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF MORPHOLOGY A
Page 269 and 270:
APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 257 Recogn
Page 271 and 272:
APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 259 to lea
Page 273 and 274:
APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 261 At the
Page 275 and 276:
Appendix D Stimuli for Experiments
Page 277 and 278:
APPENDIX D. STIMULI FOR EXPERIMENTS
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Index activation, 13, 136, 137, 231
Page 289 and 290:
INDEX 277 description, 82 see proce
Page 291:
INDEX 279 173{178, 186, 190{192, 20
show all

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?