Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bibliography Allen, R.E., H.W. Fowler, &F.G. Fowler (eds.) 1990. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English. New York: Oxford University Press, 8th edition. Alm-Arvius, Christina. 1993. The English verb see. Gothenburg studies in English. Goteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Alvarez Garcia, Teresa. 1998. Collins Spanish-English, English-Spanish dictionary = Collins diccionario espa~nol-ingles, ingles-espa~nol. New York: HarperCollins, 3rd edition. Apresjan, Ju. D. 1974. Regular polysemy. Linguistics 142.5{32. Armstrong, Sharon L., Lila R. Gleitman, &Henry Gleitman. 1983. What some concepts might notbe. Cognition 13.263{308. Asher, R.E. (ed.) 1994. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. New York: Pergamon Press, 1st edition. Atkins, B.T.S. 1992. Theoretical lexicography and its relation to dictionary-making. Dictionaries 4{43. || 1994. Analysing the verbs of seeing: a frame semantics approach to corpus lexicography. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Susanne Gahl, Andy Dolbey, & Christopher Johnson. Berkeley Linguistics Society. Baker, Collin F., 1999. Experimental mapping of sense structures of polysemous words. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Linguistics Society of America, Los Angeles. || forthcoming. Proving basic polysemy: Subjects reliably distinguish several senses of See. In Proceedings of the Twenty- fth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February, 1999 ,volume 25. Berkeley Linguistics Society. ||, Charles J. Fillmore, &John B. Lowe. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet Project. In COLING-ACL '98: Proceedings of the Conference. Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1983. Ad-hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11.211{227. || 1987. The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization, ed. by Ulric Neisser, 101{40. Cambridge, U.K.: CUP. 238
BIBLIOGRAPHY 239 Bierwisch, Manfred, &R. Schreuder. 1989. From concepts to lexical items. Cognition 42.23{60. Bloom, Paul. 1994. Overview: Controversies in language acquisition. In Language Acquisition: Core Readings, ed. by Paul Bloom, 5{48. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Bouchard, Denis. 1995. The semantics of syntax : a minimalist approach to grammar. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press. Brugman, Claudia. 1996. Mental spaces, constructional meaning, and pragmatic ambiguity. In(Fauconnier & Sweetser 1996), 29{56. Carpenter, Bob. 1992. The logic of typed feature structures, with applications to unication grammars, logic programs, and constraint resolution. Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science. New York: Cambridge University Press. Castillo, Carlos, &Otto F. Bond (eds.) 1972. University of Chicago Spanish-English English-Spanish Dictionary. NewYork: Pocket Books, revised edition. Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. Janua linguarum nr. 4. 's-Gravenhage: Mouton. ||. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press. Cohen, J. 1960. A coe cient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20.37{46. Cohen, Jonathan D., Brian MacWhinney, Matthew Flatt, & Jefferson Provost. 1993. Psyscope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 25.257{271. Coleman, Linda, &Paul Kay. 1981. Prototype semantics: the english word Lie. Language 22.26{44. Copestake, Ann, &Ted Briscoe. 1995. Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. Journal of Semantics 12.15{67. Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. Cruse, D. Alan. 1986.Lexical Semantics. New York: Cambridge University Press. ||. 1992. Monosemy vs. polysemy. Linguistics 3.577{599. de Groot, A.M.B. 1984. Primed lexical decision: Combined e ects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36A.253{280. Declerck, Renaat. 1982. The triple origin of participial perception verb complements. Linguistic Analysis 10.1{26.
Page 1 and 2:
Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psy
Page 3 and 4:
Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psy
Page 5 and 6:
Next three psycholinguistic experim
Page 7 and 8:
BasicSenses........................
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements Careful citations
Page 11 and 12:
acquisition. Aside from needing to
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 Introduction Xue er bu s,
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 3 In lingui
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 5 Although
Page 19 and 20:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 7 part on t
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 9 is not cl
Page 23 and 24:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 11 1980:10-
Page 25 and 26:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 13 L.U. Lex
Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 15 spondenc
Page 29 and 30:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 17 happy an
Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 19 shows th
Page 33 and 34:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 21 Regular
Page 35 and 36:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 23 base for
Page 37 and 38:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 25 d. The i
Page 39 and 40:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 27 (12) a.
Page 41 and 42:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 29 linguist
Page 43 and 44:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 31 Introspe
Page 45 and 46:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 33 on the o
Page 47 and 48:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 35 they con
Page 49 and 50:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 37 meaning
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 2 A Frame Semantic Analysis
Page 53 and 54:
CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSI
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 3 Other Cognitive Approache
Page 125 and 126:
CHAPTER 3. OTHER COGNITIVE APPROACH
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Semantics of Seer entity setting ph
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
CHAPTER 4. PSYCHOLINGUISTIC EXPERIM
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
CHAPTER 5. WHAT THE DICTIONARIES SA
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200: CHAPTER 5. WHAT THE DICTIONARIES SA
Page 241 and 242: CHAPTER 6. FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIO
Page 249: CHAPTER 6. FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIO
Page 253 and 254: BIBLIOGRAPHY 241 ||, & B.T.S. Atkin
Page 255 and 256: BIBLIOGRAPHY 243 ||. 1990. The inva
Page 257 and 258: BIBLIOGRAPHY 245 Osgood, C.E. 1970.
Page 259 and 260: BIBLIOGRAPHY 247 Wasow, Thomas. 198
Page 261 and 262: Appendix A Additional Corpus Exampl
Page 263 and 264: APPENDIX A. ADDITIONAL CORPUS EXAMP
Page 265 and 266: APPENDIX A. ADDITIONAL CORPUS EXAMP
Page 267 and 268: APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF MORPHOLOGY A
Page 269 and 270: APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 257 Recogn
Page 271 and 272: APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 259 to lea
Page 273 and 274: APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 261 At the
Page 275 and 276: Appendix D Stimuli for Experiments
Page 277 and 278: APPENDIX D. STIMULI FOR EXPERIMENTS
Page 287 and 288: Index activation, 13, 136, 137, 231
Page 289 and 290: INDEX 277 description, 82 see proce
Page 291: INDEX 279 173{178, 186, 190{192, 20
show all

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?