22.03.2013 Views

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3<br />

Other Cognitive Approaches<br />

3.1 Introduction<br />

Although the <strong>Frame</strong> <strong>Semantic</strong> analysis of the uses of see given in Chapter 2 allows<br />

us to make many useful generalizations about the relations among the participants in various<br />

situations which we talk about using the word see, there are some points which are h<strong>and</strong>led<br />

in a somewhat unsatisfactory fashion. In particular, the use of the feature irrealis as part<br />

of the semantics of envision <strong>and</strong> hallucinate doesn't really tell us everything we need to<br />

know about these senses, <strong>and</strong> this feature appears only with regard to these two senses|we<br />

are left with just the stipulation that all the other senses are realis by default. Another<br />

way of explaining the relation between perception <strong>and</strong> cognition in the event structure of<br />

the various senses is to represent the semantics of the seen in terms of Fauconnier's (1985<br />

[1994]) mental spaces. This approach is complementary to <strong>Frame</strong> <strong>Semantic</strong>s; as Lako &<br />

Sweetser (1985:x-xi) point out, Idealized Cognitive Models or frames can be used to express<br />

conceptual structure (relations among roles), while mental spaces can be used to express<br />

referential structure (relations between roles <strong>and</strong> their llers). 1<br />

In this chapter, I will show how a mental spaces notation can express <strong>and</strong> clarify<br />

the relations among some of the senses de ned in the previous chapter (only those senses<br />

where mental spaces seems to reveal something substantive will be discussed). I will also<br />

1 I am using the term \referential structure" in a very broad sense here. The llers may themselves<br />

be frames, as in Weddings always make me cry, where the whole wedding event is the cause of the tears.<br />

The llers may also be mappings, as in His description of his job history was less than truthful, which<br />

describes a relationship of \inequality" between two mappings (descriptions) from actual events in his past,<br />

an idealized (truthful) one <strong>and</strong> the one \he" gave. Mental spaces can also be used to represent these sorts<br />

of \meta-referential" mappings, but I will not discuss them here.<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!