22.03.2013 Views

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSIS 48<br />

gambling: To equal another player's bet in order to be allowed to see his or her cards.<br />

I'll see your twenty <strong>and</strong> raise you ten.<br />

He said he'd see me; his face fell when I turned up the kings.<br />

Compositional uses<br />

hallucinate: Tohave the sensation of seeing without the usual external physical stimulus.<br />

The exhausted soldiers saw enemies behind every tree.<br />

Hallucinogens can make people see the walls breathing <strong>and</strong> hear trees talking.<br />

scan: A process analogous to eye or recognize, but performed by amachine.<br />

The new satellite sees a larger area of North America.<br />

When the monitor sees a sudden change in the heart rate, it alerts the nurses.<br />

spectate: To witness the occurrence of an event (including performances)<br />

He saw the accident <strong>and</strong> rushed over to help the injured people.<br />

She saw the sack of the city by the Romans.<br />

Have you ever seen acricket match?<br />

She went toNewYork to see Angels in America.<br />

tour: To visit a place in order to learn about it or for pleasure<br />

After years of dreaming about it, she nally saw Italy last year.<br />

If you're going to buy their products, you really should see the factory.<br />

vide: To look at a speci c location in printed matter in order to learn something.<br />

See Appendix C for the mechanical speci cations.<br />

The megaliths were arranged in a nearly perfect circle (see Fig. 3, p. 48).<br />

Traditional Tests for Sense Di erences<br />

Having gone through such a long list, the reader mightbewondering what evidence<br />

there is to justify such ne distinctions, <strong>and</strong> which might be considered di erent uses of<br />

the same underlying sense. Lexical semanticists have usedavariety of tests to determine<br />

whether a word has more than one sense (see Cruse (1986:Ch. 3) for a more thorough<br />

discussion). Let us consider four of them as evidence for the distinctness of some of the<br />

senses shown above: synonymy, separate negation, zeugma, <strong>and</strong> identity of senses.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!