Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...
Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...
Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 4. PSYCHOLINGUISTIC EXPERIMENTS 157<br />
sight, but altered or not real (maybe a subsection of the other sight category)<br />
seeing stu in your mind; things that don't actually exist<br />
possible hallucinations<br />
look at (imaginary)<br />
to perceive imaginary objects, colors, etc<br />
hallucinate<br />
imagine a stimulus, involuntarily<br />
seeing something not really there; inside your head or imagining an image<br />
to hallucinate visual image. to visualize something that seems real only to you<br />
because it is in your mind<br />
visual delusions<br />
hallucination; create/picture an image not really there<br />
internal physical perception, internal cognitive (distorted), (hallucination), (use of<br />
imagination)<br />
visual (unreal); hallucinations<br />
Table 4.8: Subjects' de nitions for hallucinate<br />
The categorization in the rest of the table is remarkably clearcut, but let us discuss<br />
the 19 cases of intended hallucinate which were classi ed as eye. This should in principle<br />
bearelatively clear-cut distinction, between seeing a physical object <strong>and</strong> seeing \something<br />
that is not there". In fact, 13 of the 39 subjects spontaneously listed senses in the sorting<br />
task that <strong>clearly</strong> refer to our sense hallucinate, asshown by their own de nitions in<br />
Table 4.8. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, seeing hallucinations can be thought of as a kind of physical<br />
visual experience, in which the physical source (the stimulus) is inside the the body of the<br />
perceiver. (To delve any further into the actual cause of hallucinations would lead us into<br />
<strong>clearly</strong> non-linguistic questions about neurology <strong>and</strong> mental illness.) Thus, in Chapter 2,<br />
we treated hallucinate as a composition of eye <strong>and</strong> an irrealis seen.<br />
The 19 instances of intended hallucinate which were classi ed as eye arise from<br />
the 6 sentences shown in Table 4.9 on page 159. As the table indicates, all of these examples<br />
were usually classi ed as hallucinate, <strong>and</strong> the 19 instances of eye donotseemtobepart<br />
of a regular pattern. Furthermore, the highest proportion of eye responses is found in the<br />
rst sentence, which is also inherently problematic, since spots in front of your eyes can<br />
sometimes refer to \ oaters" (loose blood cells in the vitreous humor), <strong>and</strong> sometimes result<br />
from low blood pressure or low blood sugar, all of them physical causes with which people<br />
are generally familiar.<br />
As in Experiment 2, agreement among subjects on the Classi cation task was