22.03.2013 Views

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 4. PSYCHOLINGUISTIC EXPERIMENTS 157<br />

sight, but altered or not real (maybe a subsection of the other sight category)<br />

seeing stu in your mind; things that don't actually exist<br />

possible hallucinations<br />

look at (imaginary)<br />

to perceive imaginary objects, colors, etc<br />

hallucinate<br />

imagine a stimulus, involuntarily<br />

seeing something not really there; inside your head or imagining an image<br />

to hallucinate visual image. to visualize something that seems real only to you<br />

because it is in your mind<br />

visual delusions<br />

hallucination; create/picture an image not really there<br />

internal physical perception, internal cognitive (distorted), (hallucination), (use of<br />

imagination)<br />

visual (unreal); hallucinations<br />

Table 4.8: Subjects' de nitions for hallucinate<br />

The categorization in the rest of the table is remarkably clearcut, but let us discuss<br />

the 19 cases of intended hallucinate which were classi ed as eye. This should in principle<br />

bearelatively clear-cut distinction, between seeing a physical object <strong>and</strong> seeing \something<br />

that is not there". In fact, 13 of the 39 subjects spontaneously listed senses in the sorting<br />

task that <strong>clearly</strong> refer to our sense hallucinate, asshown by their own de nitions in<br />

Table 4.8. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, seeing hallucinations can be thought of as a kind of physical<br />

visual experience, in which the physical source (the stimulus) is inside the the body of the<br />

perceiver. (To delve any further into the actual cause of hallucinations would lead us into<br />

<strong>clearly</strong> non-linguistic questions about neurology <strong>and</strong> mental illness.) Thus, in Chapter 2,<br />

we treated hallucinate as a composition of eye <strong>and</strong> an irrealis seen.<br />

The 19 instances of intended hallucinate which were classi ed as eye arise from<br />

the 6 sentences shown in Table 4.9 on page 159. As the table indicates, all of these examples<br />

were usually classi ed as hallucinate, <strong>and</strong> the 19 instances of eye donotseemtobepart<br />

of a regular pattern. Furthermore, the highest proportion of eye responses is found in the<br />

rst sentence, which is also inherently problematic, since spots in front of your eyes can<br />

sometimes refer to \ oaters" (loose blood cells in the vitreous humor), <strong>and</strong> sometimes result<br />

from low blood pressure or low blood sugar, all of them physical causes with which people<br />

are generally familiar.<br />

As in Experiment 2, agreement among subjects on the Classi cation task was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!