Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CHAPTER 4. PSYCHOLINGUISTIC EXPERIMENTS 154 Materials 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Freq. H HH H H HH H H H H 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Figure 4.3: Experiment 3. Number of Categories used by each subject The seven new senses were visit, consult, process, condition, envision, hal- lucinate, and accompany. In order to keep the total set of stimuli small enough, only the 5 clearest examples of the seven senses used in Experiment 2were retained in Experiment 3. As before, not all combinations of the manipulated factors with the senses produced good sentences. Procedure The procedure was identical to that used in Experiment 2. Results and Analysis Task 1: Sorting The number of categories created by each subject in the Sorting task is shown in Figure 4.3. The median number of categories is 10, which is signi cantly larger than the median of 6 on Experiment 2 (using the median test, 2 =26:09, p
CHAPTER 4. PSYCHOLINGUISTIC EXPERIMENTS 155 accompany. Most of the de nitions were short, but one subject wantedtoleave no doubt in our minds that he meant eye, writing this de nition: to actually visualize something. To have an impulse that travels to the brain via the optic nerve so that the brain actively con rms the existence of the object you visualize. Task 2: Classi cation We found that the 10 sentences with the lowest level of agreement were causing a disproportionate amount ofmismatches between the response and the intended sense, and most of these also had no more than about 50% of agreement among the subjects' responses, so we eliminated them from further consideration, reducing the numberofstimuli from 115 to 105. (There had been no comparable problems in the data for Experiment 2.) Even a total of 14 senses, 75% of the responses agreed with the experimenters' categorization. The mean kappa among all subjects fell only to .70; after the elimination of the 10 weakest items, it rose to .75. Table 4.7 on the following page shows the relationship between intended senses and responses for Experiment 3, after the 10 weakest items have been eliminated as described above. Once again, we nd the general bias toward the response eye, and some of the same overlaps as noted in Experiment 2. In addition, the newly added senses create new combinations; the most striking result is that the majority of examples of intended process receive the response eye. Although some of the subjects created a separate category in the sorting task for what we callprocess, the predominance of eye responses for intended process stimuli suggests that most subjects regard perceiving a person performing an action as a simple physical perception (i.e. eye), notwithstanding the secondary predication associated with it. The newly introduced sense condition also creates considerable overlap, although the vast majority of cases are \correctly" recognized.
Page 1 and 2:
Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psy
Page 3 and 4:
Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psy
Page 5 and 6:
Next three psycholinguistic experim
Page 7 and 8:
BasicSenses........................
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements Careful citations
Page 11 and 12:
acquisition. Aside from needing to
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 Introduction Xue er bu s,
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 3 In lingui
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 5 Although
Page 19 and 20:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 7 part on t
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 9 is not cl
Page 23 and 24:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 11 1980:10-
Page 25 and 26:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 13 L.U. Lex
Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 15 spondenc
Page 29 and 30:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 17 happy an
Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 19 shows th
Page 33 and 34:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 21 Regular
Page 35 and 36:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 23 base for
Page 37 and 38:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 25 d. The i
Page 39 and 40:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 27 (12) a.
Page 41 and 42:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 29 linguist
Page 43 and 44:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 31 Introspe
Page 45 and 46:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 33 on the o
Page 47 and 48:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 35 they con
Page 49 and 50:
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 37 meaning
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 2 A Frame Semantic Analysis
Page 53 and 54:
CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSI
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116: CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSI
Page 123 and 124: Chapter 3 Other Cognitive Approache
Page 125 and 126: CHAPTER 3. OTHER COGNITIVE APPROACH
Page 139 and 140: Semantics of Seer entity setting ph
Page 145 and 146: CHAPTER 4. PSYCHOLINGUISTIC EXPERIM
Page 165: CHAPTER 4. PSYCHOLINGUISTIC EXPERIM
Page 177 and 178: CHAPTER 5. WHAT THE DICTIONARIES SA
Page 217 and 218:
CHAPTER 5. WHAT THE DICTIONARIES SA
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
CHAPTER 6. FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIO
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 239 Bierwisch, Manfred
Page 253 and 254:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 241 ||, & B.T.S. Atkin
Page 255 and 256:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 243 ||. 1990. The inva
Page 257 and 258:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 245 Osgood, C.E. 1970.
Page 259 and 260:
BIBLIOGRAPHY 247 Wasow, Thomas. 198
Page 261 and 262:
Appendix A Additional Corpus Exampl
Page 263 and 264:
APPENDIX A. ADDITIONAL CORPUS EXAMP
Page 265 and 266:
APPENDIX A. ADDITIONAL CORPUS EXAMP
Page 267 and 268:
APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF MORPHOLOGY A
Page 269 and 270:
APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 257 Recogn
Page 271 and 272:
APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 259 to lea
Page 273 and 274:
APPENDIX C. EXPERIMENT 1 261 At the
Page 275 and 276:
Appendix D Stimuli for Experiments
Page 277 and 278:
APPENDIX D. STIMULI FOR EXPERIMENTS
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Index activation, 13, 136, 137, 231
Page 289 and 290:
INDEX 277 description, 82 see proce
Page 291:
INDEX 279 173{178, 186, 190{192, 20
show all

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?