22.03.2013 Views

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 3. OTHER COGNITIVE APPROACHES 120<br />

f. Through the piles of leaves . . . , the dogs picked up the scent of the escaped<br />

prisoner.<br />

Thus we could say that there is a folk theory of vision which is \extramissive", in which<br />

vision or the \gaze" travels from the eyes to the seen. Let us agree with Lako that this<br />

is an example of the more general metaphors perception is touch <strong>and</strong> perceptual<br />

organs are limbs, <strong>and</strong> further that, since we have found that the motion can be con-<br />

strued in either direction, that both directions can be subsumed under the more general<br />

metaphor perception is contact between perceiver <strong>and</strong> perceived. We need not<br />

agree exactly with Lako that the prepositional phrases in Ex. (5) make the main verbs<br />

metaphorical, but the examples in Ex. (4) <strong>and</strong> (5) do suggest that perception events can<br />

be construed as metaphorical motion, <strong>and</strong> that this metaphorical motion can be in either<br />

direction.<br />

When we look at perception which is per se metaphorical, such asrecognize, we<br />

often nd these combined with metaphorical motion as well, but the mappings are somewhat<br />

di erent. As Lako (1995:141) points out, what is usually the content of perception as<br />

in Ex. (5-a) also can be a metaphorical goal, as in Ex. (5-b).<br />

Furthermore, the experiencer can be construed as a goal <strong>and</strong> the stimulus as<br />

a source, both of the physical perception <strong>and</strong> of the knowing. This mapping works best<br />

when the metaphorical motion is from stimulus to experiencer, as in Lako 's example,<br />

(6) John looks sick to me from the pictures.<br />

There are many other ways to express judgements of this sort without the to <strong>and</strong><br />

from, <strong>and</strong> hence, the suggestion of motion, as in Ex. (7).<br />

(7) a. When I saw the pictures, I was convinced John was sick.<br />

b. Judging by the pictures, John must be sick.<br />

c. Based on how he looks in the pictures, I'm sure John is sick.<br />

When the main verb is see, the direction of motion is presumably from experiencer<br />

to percept, yet we still get blends with a PPfrom; thus these can be either a physical starting<br />

place for eye, or the abstract starting place for the mental event that leads to knowing;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!