22.03.2013 Views

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

Seeing clearly: Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 2. A FRAME SEMANTIC ANALYSIS 53<br />

(20) a. setting + setting:<br />

Japan <strong>and</strong> California have both seen quite a few earthquakes recently.<br />

b. setting + experience:<br />

California <strong>and</strong> its residents have both seen quite a few earthquakes recently.<br />

(21) a. news + news:<br />

I see that the President is going to be in town tomorrow <strong>and</strong> (that) they're<br />

going to close Main Street for the afternoon.<br />

b. news + recognize:<br />

I see that the President is going to be in town tomorrow <strong>and</strong>whyyou don't<br />

want togodowntown tomorrow afternoon.<br />

Identity of Senses (<strong>Cross</strong>ed readings)<br />

A fourth test for sense di erences, closely related to zeugma, uses sentences in<br />

which \VP deletion" produces gaps. Supposed we believe that there are two senses of<br />

teacher, one meaning `male teacher' <strong>and</strong> the other `female teacher' (corresponding to those<br />

morphologically marked in many languages with grammatical gender). Then suppose that<br />

John has written a letter to his high school math teacher Bill Smith, <strong>and</strong> Joe has written<br />

a letter to his math teacher Sally Jones; we still would nd nothing odd in Ex. (22). This<br />

indicates that our supposition of two separate senses is wrong, that teacher is general,<br />

covering both male <strong>and</strong> female, rather than ambiguous between two distinct senses.<br />

(22) John wrote to his teacher <strong>and</strong> Joe did, too.<br />

Now let us apply this test to see. Ex. (23) can be considered to contain two instances of<br />

seeing, one where the experiencer was Jan, <strong>and</strong> one where the experiencer was Chris. If see<br />

has two senses, visit <strong>and</strong> eye, either of which could be occurring here, we might expect<br />

there to be four acceptable readings of the sentence, one for each combination of senses.<br />

There is certainly nothing wrong with Ex. (23) in a context in which Jan <strong>and</strong> Chris both<br />

went to visit Pat, or in a context in which both of them caught eeting glimpses of Pat. But<br />

we nd Ex. (23) unacceptable in a situation in which Jan visited with Pat for ten minutes<br />

<strong>and</strong> Chris only sawPat through the window of a passing train; the single word saw \resists"<br />

interpretation as visit in the rst clause <strong>and</strong> eye in the second.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!