Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals
Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals
Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram of five standard substances (1, Luteoloside; 2, Luteolin; 3, Physalin A; 4, Physalin P; 5,<br />
Physalin O) (A) and the calyces of Physalis Alkekengi L. var. Franchetii (B).<br />
Chromatographic system and conditions<br />
HPLC analysis was carried out with an Agilent 1100 series HPLC<br />
(Palo Alto, CA) incorporating a UV detector. The analytes were<br />
determined at 30°C on an analytical column (Agilent C18, 150×4.6<br />
mm, 5-μm particle size) (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). The<br />
mobile phase consisted of the solvent (A) acetonitrile and (B) 0.2%<br />
aqueous phosphoric acid (v/v) using a gradient elution of 20 to 23%<br />
(A) at 0 to 13 min and 23 to 31% (A) at 13 to 37 min and then<br />
returned to initial condition for a 5 min re-equilibration, with total run<br />
time 42 min. The mobile phase was passed under vacuum through<br />
a 0.45-μm membrane filter before use. The analysis was carried out<br />
at a flow rate of 1 ml/min with the detection wavelength set at 350<br />
nm at 0 to 24 min and at 220 nm at 24 to 37 min.<br />
Sample preparation<br />
Crushed dried calyces of P. alkekengi are the 50 mesh, to the<br />
conical flask with lid, 0.5 g of the powder of the calyces and 25 ml<br />
of carbinol were add, then extracted in an ultrasonic bath for 1 h.<br />
The filtrate concentrated to 25 ml volumetric flask. The filtrate were<br />
filtered with 0.45 μm membrane filer to obtain the filtered solution<br />
and an aliquot (20 μl) of filtrate was injected into the HPLC system.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
HPLC analysis<br />
Our attempts to use the method with isocratic elution for<br />
the determination of five active ingredients were<br />
unsuccessful. The gradient elutionmethod was, therefore<br />
used for the separation of the ingredients. During method<br />
Xu et al. 2439<br />
development, the mobile phase composition varied using<br />
different combinations of methanol, acetonitrile and<br />
phosphoric acid. It demonstrated a longer retention time<br />
with a decrease in the organic composition. Here, the<br />
mobile phase consisting of (A), acetonitrile and (B) 0.2%<br />
phosphoric acid were chosen to achieve good peak<br />
shape, satisfactory resolution, and relatively short<br />
analysis time. Figure 1 show typical chromatograms of<br />
the standard substances (A), and the calyces of P.<br />
Alkekengi (B). The retention times of Luteoloside,<br />
Luteolin, Physalin A, Physalin P and Physalin O, were<br />
approximately 6.7, 21.9, 27.9, 32.2 and 33.1 min,<br />
respectively, and the total chromatographic run time was<br />
37 min.<br />
Through the pre-test we found the maximum absorption<br />
of the five active ingredients at 220 nm, but the<br />
Luteoloside and Luteolin were not well separated from<br />
adjacent interference peaks and the baseline was not<br />
smooth. Luteoloside and Luteolin also had the maximum<br />
absorption at 350 nm, but Physalin A, Physalin P and<br />
Physalin O were not detected. So the detection<br />
wavelength set at 350 nm at 0 to 24 min and at 220 nm at<br />
24 to 37 min was chosen in the assay and suitable for the<br />
simultaneous determination of the five active ingredients.<br />
A mixture of methanol-water (70:30, v/v) was chosen as<br />
the extraction solvent. A simple ultrasonic method was<br />
used for sample preparation, which was timesaving and<br />
may not lead to losses of the five active ingredients. The<br />
sample clean-up steps to a minimum were a primary<br />
concern; thus, the filtrate, after ultrasonication, was