Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 6. Simple correlation between final studied traits at final harvest. Amoghein et al. 2499 Trait 50% branch-bearing 50% flowering Yield Oil percentage Oil yield 50% flowering 0.27 ns 1.00 Yield 0.16 ns -0.03 ns 1.00 Oil percentage 0.29 * -0.20 ns 0.46 ** 1.00 Oil yield -0.23 ns -0.26 ns 0.09 ns 0.24 ns 1.00 ns, * and ** show non-significance and significance at 5 and 1% probability level, respectively. branch-bearing, flowering initiation and 50% flowering stages. Means comparison for the number of days to 50% flowering (Table 5) showed that plants reached to 50% flowering earlier under rainfed system than under irrigated system and plant density did not impact this trait. As the table of correlations (Table 6) showed, 50% flowering had positive, significant correlation with the distance of the first head-bearing branch from ground, seed weight per head and harvest index. Days to flowering termination The results of analysis of variance (Table 4) indicated statistically significant difference between the simple effect of planting system and the interactions of the density and planting system at 5% probability level. Similar results can be seen in the table of means comparison (Table 5), so that the plants cultivated under rainfed system reached to the end of flowering stage earlier than those planted under irrigated system. Also, the interaction of planting system and plant density on this trait showed that the plants cultivated at the density of 30 plants.m -2 under irrigated system had the lower density of this treatment was the main reason for higher number of days to flowering termination of the plants cultivated at the density of 30 plants.m -2 under irrigated system; that is, lower density intensified interplant competition and so, the plants utilized nutrients, light and water as good as possible and increased their vegetative growth which led to the increase in the number of days to flowering termination. Oil percentage The results of analysis of variance for oil percentage (Table 4) showed significant differences between the simple effects of different plant densities at 5% probability level. Nonetheless, according to means comparison (Table 5), the simple effect of planting system was not significant on oil percentage but among the densities, the lowest one (30 plants.m -2 ) had the highest oil percentage and the density of 40 plants.m -2 gave rise to the lowest oil percentage in their seeds. The oil percentage of the densities of 50 and 60 plants.m -2 was between these two extremes. Denser population of the plants increases oil percentage but decreases iodine content (Abddollahi and Zarrinjoob, 2001). Patel and Patel (1996) concluded that oil percentage was influenced by irrigation regimes and that with the increase in irrigation, oil percentage was increased too. Singh et al. (1990) studied the effect of different irrigation regimes on yield and oil of safflower and reported that the highest oil percentage was produced by irrigating the plant at branch-bearing and seed formation stages. The results of other studies (Heidari and Asad, 1998; Patel, 1993) also show that irrigation withdrawal and drought stress reduces oil percentage of the seeds with the variations being slight but significant. By increasing the density, Sharikian and Babayian (2000) observed the decrease in oil percentage and increase in protein percentage of the seeds which are in agreement with the results of the current study (Figure 3). As the table of correlations (Table 6) shows, oil percentage had positive, significant relation with the traits of 50% branch-bearing, the distance of the first headbearing branch from ground, seed weight per head and seed weight per m 2 and had positive, very significant relation with the traits of the number of seeds per m 2 , harvest index and yield. Oil yield Table 4 shows the analysis of variance for oil yield. It can be drawn from this table that there was statistically significant difference between the simple effects of planting systems (rainfed and irrigated) at 1% probability level, while according to the means comparison for this trait (Table 5), the highest oil yield was produced under irrigated system. But, the simple effect of density did not affect oil yield. Figure 4 shows the interactions between plant density and planting systems on this trait, according which the highest oil yield was obtained from the highest density under the irrigated system and the lowest one was obtained from the densities of 40 and 60 plants.m -2 under rainfed system. As mentioned earlier, oil percentage was increased
2500 J. Med. Plants Res. Flowering termination (days after planting) 104 103 102 101 100 99 98 97 planting) a b Irrigated Rainfed b b 30 40 50 60 Plant density ( plants . m - 2 ) Figure 3. Diagram of flowering termination (days after planting) as affected by plant density and planting system. Oil yield (days after planting) 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 bc bc bc c ab Irrigated Rainfed 30 40 50 60 ab Plant density (plant.m -2 ) . - Figure 4. Diagram of oil yield (days after planting) as affected by plant density and planting system. with the decrease in the density while oil yield was increased with the decrease in the density which was contrary to the results obtained for the oil. Since the highest seed yield was obtained from the density of 60 plants.m - , it seems that seed yield per hectare was the reason for the increase in oil yield per hectare at b bc this density. In a study on the stepwise regression for seed and oil yield including four traits of biological yield, the number of bolls, the number of auxiliary branches and the number of seeds per boll, the results of path analysis for seed and oil yield showed that in order to increase the yield, firstly seed yield must be increased which is in turn b a b c
Page 1 and 2:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
Page 3 and 4:
Editors Prof. Akah Peter Achunike E
Page 5 and 6:
Electronic submission of manuscript
Page 7 and 8:
Fees and Charges: Authors are requi
Page 9 and 10:
Table of Contents: Volume 6 Number
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 1. Chuanxiong Rhizoma (http:
Page 17 and 18:
Table 1. Identification of main pea
Page 19 and 20:
Table 3. Pharmacokinetic parameters
Page 21 and 22:
active component study, many invest
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
and 1185 kg ha -1 in the first site
Page 27 and 28:
Table 1. Recommendation for use fer
Page 29 and 30:
Sadanandan AK, Hamza S (1996c). Stu
Page 31 and 32:
and it has been traced to South Ame
Page 33 and 34:
Table 3. Results of phytochemical a
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
(a) (b) (c) Figure 1. (a) Normal ce
Page 39 and 40:
emedies in the south of Brazil. J.
Page 41 and 42:
known fatty acids and terpenoids we
Page 43 and 44:
Table 1. Renal function tests of ra
Page 45 and 46:
Al-Radahe et al. 2271 Figure 3.nnnn
Page 47 and 48:
namely disruption of the vascular e
Page 49 and 50:
Zayachkivska OS, Konturek SJ, Drozd
Page 51 and 52:
β-carotene were purchased from Sig
Page 53 and 54:
Figure 1. Effect of ethanol concent
Page 55 and 56:
Table 3. Climatic and soil factors
Page 57 and 58:
content of polysaccharides. Phospha
Page 59 and 60:
Serge et al. 2285 Table 1. Relative
Page 61 and 62:
Percentage inhibition % of inhibiti
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Table 1. Result of phytochemical sc
Page 67 and 68:
Table 3. Result of thin layer chrom
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Table 2. MIC of a compound 1 from c
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Zirihi et al. 2301 Figure 2. Termin
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 5. T. catappa Linn. (Combret
Page 79 and 80:
Figure 8. A. fumigatus: Aspect of c
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 12. Sensitivity of A. fumiga
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Noormi et al. 2311 Table 1. Callus
Page 87 and 88:
Table 2. Contd. NoC=No callus. 4.0
Page 89 and 90:
Figure 2. Contd. at 2.0 mg/L yellow
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Table 1. Biochemical parameters in
Page 95 and 96:
Figure 3. Bcl-xL reactions in inter
Page 97 and 98:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would l
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 1. The first page of the boo
Page 101 and 102:
Figure 3. The most widely included
Page 103 and 104:
Figure 4. Lithographic print “St.
Page 105 and 106:
Table 1. List of plants included in
Page 107 and 108:
Table 1. Contd. Nedelcheva 2333 Cin
Page 109 and 110:
Table 1. Contd. Nedelcheva 2335 Rhe
Page 111 and 112:
14 7 1 15 1 35 17 16 Imported plant
Page 113 and 114:
Academy of Science Publishing House
Page 115 and 116:
et al., 1996; van Wyk and Gericke,
Page 117 and 118:
DPPH inhibition (%) DPPH % inhibiti
Page 119 and 120:
% Mortality Concentration (µg/ml)
Page 121 and 122:
information on plants used for the
Page 123 and 124:
Table 1. Levels of independent vari
Page 125 and 126:
Arbutin (mg/g) Co-solvent Figure 1.
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Arbutin (mg/g) Extraction pressure
Page 131 and 132:
Table 3. Arbuitn content of Asian p
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Arbutin (mg/g) Extraction pressure
Page 137 and 138:
Arbutin (mg/g) Extraction temperatu
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Table 1. Chemical composition of es
Page 143 and 144:
Darjazi 2369 Table 2. Statistical a
Page 145 and 146:
Table 3. Correlation matrix (number
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Table 1. Precision test. extraction
Page 151 and 152:
Figure 2. Effect of different alcoh
Page 153 and 154:
Table 6. Results of ANOVA. Nie et a
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Table 2. Plant data and MIC values
Page 159 and 160:
exhibiting the polar extracts of P.
Page 161 and 162:
Table 3. Contd. AcOEt ++ ++ ++ - Me
Page 163 and 164:
Figure 1. Map of Ladakh region of I
Page 165 and 166:
Warghat et al. 2391 Table 3. Summar
Page 167 and 168:
Table 5. Inter-Population genetic i
Page 169 and 170:
Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM
Page 171 and 172:
ice residue is an ideal raw materia
Page 173 and 174:
DPPH• scavenging ratio(%) OD valu
Page 175 and 176:
scavenging effect on free radical a
Page 177 and 178:
our new CL system. Fenton reaction
Page 179 and 180:
1 2 Time (s) Figure 2. Kinetic curv
Page 181 and 182:
Wong et al., 2006). It can be seen
Page 183 and 184:
Pan YM, Liang Y, Wang HS, Liang M (
Page 185 and 186:
2422 J. Med. Plants Res. close cano
Page 187 and 188:
2424 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. M
Page 189 and 190:
2426 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. C
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
2432 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 2. D
Page 197 and 198:
2434 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 6. T
Page 199 and 200:
2436 J. Med. Plants Res. budget dur
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
2440 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. R
Page 205 and 206:
2442 J. Med. Plants Res. Stability
Page 207 and 208:
2444 J. Med. Plants Res. production
Page 209 and 210:
2446 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 2.
Page 211 and 212: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
Page 213 and 214: 2450 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 2. A
Page 215 and 216: 2452 J. Med. Plants Res. Ghasemi Pi
Page 217 and 218: 2454 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. I
Page 219 and 220: 2456 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. M
Page 223 and 224: 2460 J. Med. Plants Res. Department
Page 225 and 226: 2462 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. E
Page 229 and 230: 2466 J. Med. Plants Res. AOAC (2000
Page 233 and 234: 2470 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. F
Page 235 and 236: 2472 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. S
Page 239 and 240: 2476 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 1.
Page 243 and 244: 2480 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. W
Page 245 and 246: 2482 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 2. C
Page 247 and 248: 2484 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. C
Page 249 and 250: 2486 J. Med. Plants Res. components
Page 253 and 254: 2490 J. Med. Plants Res. Inhibition
Page 257 and 258: 2494 J. Med. Plants Res. can increa
Page 261: 2498 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 4. S
Page 265 and 266: 2502 J. Med. Plants Res. harvest in
Page 275 and 276: 2512 J. Med. Plants Res. over-expre
Page 279 and 280: 2516 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. P
Page 287 and 288: 2524 J. Med. Plants Res. ACKNOWLEDG
Page 289 and 290: UPCOMING CONFERENCES 15th European
Page 291: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
show all

Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?