2254 J. Med. Plants Res. application varied. Medicinal crops like C. roseus showed response to as low as 20 kg K2O per hectare and on the other hand, ginger yield could be raised by applying 150 kg K2O per ha -1 . Studies indicates that N, P and K nutrients applied in some definite combinations caused increase in yields rather than supplying either of the major nutrients alone. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the University of Jiroft for financial supports and Dr. Hamdollah Ravand is also acknowledged for kindly editing the manuscript. REFERENCES Afridi NMRK, Wasiuddin SH, Samiullah S, Paraiz MA (1983). Effect of NPK on growth and yield of fennel (Foeniculum Vulgare). Agric. Sci. Prod., 1: 63-73. Ameenah GF (2006). Medicinal plants: Traditions of yesterday and drugs of tomorrow. Mol. Asp. Med., 27: 1-93. Amit K, Sundeep K (2007). Growth potential of Indian mustard var Vardan to varying levels of nitrogen and sulphur. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 41(4): 287-291. Anilkumar B, Yadav Y, Dhankhar OP (2001). Performance of fourrowed Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) mutant under different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 71(6): 375-377. Ashokan PK, Vikramannari R, Kurian TM (1984). Nitrogen and potassium requirements of rainfed sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). J. Root Crop, 10(12): 55-57. Balashanmugam PV, Subramanian KS (1991). Effect of split application of potassium on turmeric. South Int. Hortic., 39(3): 139-142. Bandopadhyay P, Samul RC (1999). Response of kharif groundnut to varying levels of phosphorus, potassium and sulphur in West Bengal. J. Oilseeds Res., 16(1): 82-85. Bhari NR, Siag RK, Mann PS (2000). Response of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) to nitrogen and phosphorus on Torripsamments of north-western Rajasthan. Indian J. Agron., 45(4): 746-751. Boroomand N, Nakhaei M, Sadat HGM (2011a). Effect of potassium and phosphorous on growth and yield of Aloe Vera L. 7 th Iranian Congress of Horticultural Science, Isfahan, Iran. Pp. 375-381. September, 2011. Boroomand N, Marezi A, Sadat HGM (2011b). Effect of organic and phosphorus on mineral and yield of Ocimum basilicum. 7 th Iranian Congress of Horticultural Science, Isfahan, Iran. Pp. 363-368. September, 2011. Buwalda JG (1986). Nitrogen nutrition of garlic (Allium sativum L.) under irrigation components of yield and indices of crop nitrogen status. Sci. Hortic., 29: 69-76. Clarkson D, Hanson J (1980). “The Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants.” Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 31: 239–298. Esskaf G, Aljaro U (1982). Two trails on the effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on garlic. Agric. Technol., 42: 143-147. Fageria NK, Bajpai MR, Parihar RL (1972). Effect of NPK on yield and yield attributing characters of cumin crop. Zeitschriftfil Pflanzenernachecing Und Bodes Kunde. 132(1): 30-34 (c.f. Hort. Abs, 43: 6290). Farahani HA, Khalvati MA (2011). Effects of arbuscular ycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus on coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) essential oil in drought stress condition. Agroecol. Ecol. Agric., 6: 158-163. Garnayak LM, Singh NP, Subedar S, Paikaray PK (2000). Influence of irrigation and nitrogen on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by late sown Brassica oil seeds. Indian J. Agron., 45(2): 371-378. Harendra K, Yadav DS (2007). Effect of phosphorus and sulphur levels on growth, yield and quality of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) cultivars. Ind. J. Agron., 52(2): 1541-157. Hocking PJ, Randall PJ, De Marco D (1997). The response of dryland canola to nitrogen fertilizer: partitioning and mobilization of dry matter and nitrogen and nitrogen effects on yield components. Field Crop Res., 54: 201-220. Katarzyna D, Zbigniew J (2006). Influence potassium fertilization on the yield and on the nutrients content in Satureja Hortensis L. Acta Agrophys., 7: 879-884. Korikanthimath VS (1994). Nutrition of cardamom. In: Advances in Horticulture (Eds.) Chadha, K.L. and Rethinam, P. Malhotra Publishing House, New Delhi, 9(1): 467-476. Kulkarni DS, Kulkarni SV, Suryanarayana RBG, Pattanshetty HV (1971). Nutrient uptake of cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum M.). In: Proc. Int. Symp. Soil fertil. Eval., New Delhi, 1: 293-296. Kumar P, Adityasharma Sing PK, Hord DK (2002). Integrated nutrient management in mudgaparni (Phaseolus trilobus). Extended summaries 2nd Int. Agron. Cong., New Delhi, 1(26-30): 317- 318. Lalitha SG, Gopala RP (2004). Influence of plant population and nitrogen levels on growth characters and seed yield of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). The Andhra Agric. J., 51(3&4): 281-283. Lewis DC, Potter TD, Weckert SE, Grant IL (1987). Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on the seed yield and oil concentration of oil seed rape and the prediction of responses by soil tests and past paddock use. Austr. J. Exp. Agric., 27: 713-720. Lynch J, Lauchli A, Epstein E (1991). Vegetative growth of the common bean in response to phosphorus nutrition. Crop Sci., 31: 380-382. Mekawey M, Ali M, Awad AE, Hassan M (2010). Effect of fertilization and Growth regulator on (Soriandrum Sativum L.) plants productivity under north sinal conitions. J. Agric. Res. Kafer Univ., 36: 314-339. Minard HRG (1978). Effect of clove size, spacing, fertilizer and lime on yield and nutrient contens of garlic (Allium Sativum L) Newzeland. J. Exp. Agric., 6: 139-143. Moradkhani H, Sargsyan E, Bibak H, Naseri B, Sadat-Hosseini M, Fayazi-Barjin A, Meftahizade H (2010). Melissa officinalis L., a valuable medicine plant: A review. J. Med. Plants Res., 4: 2753-2759. Muralidharan A (1973). Varietal performance of ginger in Waynad (Kerala). J. Plant. Crop, 1: 19-20. Muralidharan G, Sadandan N, Vikraman NN (1976). Effect of time of application of nitrogen at different levels on the uptake of nitrogen by sweet potato varieties. J. Root Crop., 2(2): 15-12. Okut N, Yidirmi B (2005). Effect of different row spacing and nitrogen doses on certain agronomic characteristics of coriander (Corianderum sativum L.). Prod. J. Biol. Sci., 8: 901-904. Panwar AS, Singh NP (2003). Effect of conjunctive use of phosphorus and bioorganics on growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogae). Indian J. Agron., 48: 214-216. Pareek SK, Virendersingh SA, Pilania DS, Ashok K (2002). Effect of method of sowing, time of harvesting and nitrogen on dry root yield of panchpatri (Ipomoea pestigrides). Extended summaries 2nd International Agronomy Congress, vol. 1, November 26-30, New Delhi, Pp. 318-319. Pillai OR, Boominathan H (1975). Effect of NPK fertilizers on the yield of Coriander. Arecanut and Spices Bulletin 6(4): 82-83 (c.f. Hort. Abs. 64: 10583). Pillai VS, Sasikumaran S, Ibrahim KK (1987). NPK requirement of black pepper. Agric. Res. J. Kerala. 25(1): 74-80. Rethinam P, Sadanandan AK (1994). Nutrition management of Seed Spices. In: Advances in Horticulture (eds.) Chadha KL, Rethinam P, Malhotra Publishing House, New Delhi. 9: 423-456. Rethinavel M (1983). Effect of Potash application and time of harvest on growth, yield and quality of turmeric. M.Sc (Ag) Thesis. TNAU, Coimbatore. Ross AI (2005). Medicinal plants of the world. (eds) Chemical Constituents. Sadanandan AK (1993). Potassium in soils growing black pepper (Piper nigrum L) and response of applied potash. In: “Potassium for Plantation Crops”, (Eds) Mahatim S, Mishra M. Potash Research Institute of India, Gurgaon, Haryana. Pp. 75-88. Sadanandan AK, Hamza S (1998). Organic farming on yield and quality of spices in India (Abs.) 16 th World Congress on Soil Science; Montpellier, France during 20-26. P. 738.
Sadanandan AK, Hamza S (1996c). Studies on nutritional requirement of bush pepper (Piper nigrum L) for yield and quality. In: Development in Plantation Crops Research (Eds.) Mathew, N.M and Kuruvilla Jacob. Allied Publishers Ltd., New Delhi. Pp. 223-227. Sadanandan AK, Rohini I (1986). Effect of organic amendments on rhizome rot of ginger. Indian Coco Areca Nut Spices, 9(4): 94-95. Sadanandan AK, Korikanthimath VS, Hamza S (1993a). Potassium in soils of cardamom (Elattaria cardamomum M.) Plantations. In “Potassium forPlantation Crops”, (Eds) Mahatim Singh and M.K, Mishra. Potash Research Institute of India, Haryana. Pp. 89-101. Sadanandan AK, Raju CA, Anandaraj M (1988). Effect of cultural practices and organic amendments on the incidence of soft rot of ginger. In: Proceedings National Seminar on Chilli, Ginger and Turmeric (Eds.) Satyanarayana et al, Spices Board and APAU, Hyderabad. January 11-12, 1988. Pp. 149-152. Sadanandand N, Shashidharan AK (1979). A note on the performance of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) under graded doses of nitrogen. J. Res., 17: 103-104. Saraf V, Bhatt KG, Pareek SK (2002). Effect of plant density and fertilizers levels on growth and yield of danti (Baliospermum montanum), Extended summaries 2nd International agronomy congress, vol. 1, NOV. 26- 30, New Delhi, Pp. 314-315. Sarma DA (1985). Effect of varieties and levels of nitrogen on the yield of castor. The Andhra Agric. J., 32(2): 133-134. Boroomand and Grouh 2255 Sharpley AN, Daniel TC, Sims JT, Pote DH (1996). Determining environmentally sound phosphorus levels. J. Soil Water Conserv., 51(2): 160-166. Shishu PS, Vinay S (2005). Effect of nitrogen, sulphur and zinc on Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 75(12): 828- 830. Solecki RS, Shanidar IV (1975). Neanderthal flower burial in northern Iraq. Science, 190: 880-881. Suresh NS (1980). Studies on the effects of nutrients and growth regulators on growth and yield of Catharathus roseus M.Sc. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore. Vasantha KK, Mohanakumaran N (1989). Nutrient status of cardamom at different stages of maturity. Spice India, 11: 17-23. Waard PW, De F (1969). Foilar diagnosis, nutrition and yield stability of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) In Sarawak. Communication No. 58, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam. The Netherlands. P. 150. Wiedenhoeft AC (2006). Plant nutrition. Hopkins WG (eds) the green world, Chelsea House publisher, New York NY. Pp. 16-43.
- Page 1 and 2: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 3 and 4: Editors Prof. Akah Peter Achunike E
- Page 5 and 6: Electronic submission of manuscript
- Page 7 and 8: Fees and Charges: Authors are requi
- Page 9 and 10: Table of Contents: Volume 6 Number
- Page 11 and 12: Table of Contents: Volume 6 Number
- Page 13 and 14: Table of Contents: Volume 6 Number
- Page 15 and 16: Figure 1. Chuanxiong Rhizoma (http:
- Page 17 and 18: Table 1. Identification of main pea
- Page 19 and 20: Table 3. Pharmacokinetic parameters
- Page 21 and 22: active component study, many invest
- Page 23 and 24: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 25 and 26: and 1185 kg ha -1 in the first site
- Page 27: Table 1. Recommendation for use fer
- Page 31 and 32: and it has been traced to South Ame
- Page 33 and 34: Table 3. Results of phytochemical a
- Page 35 and 36: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 37 and 38: (a) (b) (c) Figure 1. (a) Normal ce
- Page 39 and 40: emedies in the south of Brazil. J.
- Page 41 and 42: known fatty acids and terpenoids we
- Page 43 and 44: Table 1. Renal function tests of ra
- Page 45 and 46: Al-Radahe et al. 2271 Figure 3.nnnn
- Page 47 and 48: namely disruption of the vascular e
- Page 49 and 50: Zayachkivska OS, Konturek SJ, Drozd
- Page 51 and 52: β-carotene were purchased from Sig
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 1. Effect of ethanol concent
- Page 55 and 56: Table 3. Climatic and soil factors
- Page 57 and 58: content of polysaccharides. Phospha
- Page 59 and 60: Serge et al. 2285 Table 1. Relative
- Page 61 and 62: Percentage inhibition % of inhibiti
- Page 63 and 64: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 65 and 66: Table 1. Result of phytochemical sc
- Page 67 and 68: Table 3. Result of thin layer chrom
- Page 69 and 70: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 71 and 72: Table 2. MIC of a compound 1 from c
- Page 73 and 74: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 75 and 76: Zirihi et al. 2301 Figure 2. Termin
- Page 77 and 78: Figure 5. T. catappa Linn. (Combret
- Page 79 and 80:
Figure 8. A. fumigatus: Aspect of c
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure 12. Sensitivity of A. fumiga
- Page 83 and 84:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 85 and 86:
Noormi et al. 2311 Table 1. Callus
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 2. Contd. NoC=No callus. 4.0
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 2. Contd. at 2.0 mg/L yellow
- Page 91 and 92:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 1. Biochemical parameters in
- Page 95 and 96:
Figure 3. Bcl-xL reactions in inter
- Page 97 and 98:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would l
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 1. The first page of the boo
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 3. The most widely included
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 4. Lithographic print “St.
- Page 105 and 106:
Table 1. List of plants included in
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 1. Contd. Nedelcheva 2333 Cin
- Page 109 and 110:
Table 1. Contd. Nedelcheva 2335 Rhe
- Page 111 and 112:
14 7 1 15 1 35 17 16 Imported plant
- Page 113 and 114:
Academy of Science Publishing House
- Page 115 and 116:
et al., 1996; van Wyk and Gericke,
- Page 117 and 118:
DPPH inhibition (%) DPPH % inhibiti
- Page 119 and 120:
% Mortality Concentration (µg/ml)
- Page 121 and 122:
information on plants used for the
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 1. Levels of independent vari
- Page 125 and 126:
Arbutin (mg/g) Co-solvent Figure 1.
- Page 127 and 128:
Arbutin (mg/g) Co-solvent Figure 3.
- Page 129 and 130:
Arbutin (mg/g) Extraction pressure
- Page 131 and 132:
Table 3. Arbuitn content of Asian p
- Page 133 and 134:
Arbutin (mg/g) Co-solvent Figure 8.
- Page 135 and 136:
Arbutin (mg/g) Extraction pressure
- Page 137 and 138:
Arbutin (mg/g) Extraction temperatu
- Page 139 and 140:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 141 and 142:
Table 1. Chemical composition of es
- Page 143 and 144:
Darjazi 2369 Table 2. Statistical a
- Page 145 and 146:
Table 3. Correlation matrix (number
- Page 147 and 148:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 149 and 150:
Table 1. Precision test. extraction
- Page 151 and 152:
Figure 2. Effect of different alcoh
- Page 153 and 154:
Table 6. Results of ANOVA. Nie et a
- Page 155 and 156:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 157 and 158:
Table 2. Plant data and MIC values
- Page 159 and 160:
exhibiting the polar extracts of P.
- Page 161 and 162:
Table 3. Contd. AcOEt ++ ++ ++ - Me
- Page 163 and 164:
Figure 1. Map of Ladakh region of I
- Page 165 and 166:
Warghat et al. 2391 Table 3. Summar
- Page 167 and 168:
Table 5. Inter-Population genetic i
- Page 169 and 170:
Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM
- Page 171 and 172:
ice residue is an ideal raw materia
- Page 173 and 174:
DPPH• scavenging ratio(%) OD valu
- Page 175 and 176:
scavenging effect on free radical a
- Page 177 and 178:
our new CL system. Fenton reaction
- Page 179 and 180:
1 2 Time (s) Figure 2. Kinetic curv
- Page 181 and 182:
Wong et al., 2006). It can be seen
- Page 183 and 184:
Pan YM, Liang Y, Wang HS, Liang M (
- Page 185 and 186:
2422 J. Med. Plants Res. close cano
- Page 187 and 188:
2424 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. M
- Page 189 and 190:
2426 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. C
- Page 191 and 192:
2428 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. C
- Page 193 and 194:
2430 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. C
- Page 195 and 196:
2432 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 2. D
- Page 197 and 198:
2434 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 6. T
- Page 199 and 200:
2436 J. Med. Plants Res. budget dur
- Page 201 and 202:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 203 and 204:
2440 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. R
- Page 205 and 206:
2442 J. Med. Plants Res. Stability
- Page 207 and 208:
2444 J. Med. Plants Res. production
- Page 209 and 210:
2446 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 2.
- Page 211 and 212:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 213 and 214:
2450 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 2. A
- Page 215 and 216:
2452 J. Med. Plants Res. Ghasemi Pi
- Page 217 and 218:
2454 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. I
- Page 219 and 220:
2456 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. M
- Page 221 and 222:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 223 and 224:
2460 J. Med. Plants Res. Department
- Page 225 and 226:
2462 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. E
- Page 227 and 228:
2464 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 6. E
- Page 229 and 230:
2466 J. Med. Plants Res. AOAC (2000
- Page 231 and 232:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 233 and 234:
2470 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. F
- Page 235 and 236:
2472 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. S
- Page 237 and 238:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 239 and 240:
2476 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 1.
- Page 241 and 242:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 243 and 244:
2480 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. W
- Page 245 and 246:
2482 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 2. C
- Page 247 and 248:
2484 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. C
- Page 249 and 250:
2486 J. Med. Plants Res. components
- Page 251 and 252:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 253 and 254:
2490 J. Med. Plants Res. Inhibition
- Page 255 and 256:
2492 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 3.
- Page 257 and 258:
2494 J. Med. Plants Res. can increa
- Page 259 and 260:
2496 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 2. S
- Page 261 and 262:
2498 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 4. S
- Page 263 and 264:
2500 J. Med. Plants Res. Flowering
- Page 265 and 266:
2502 J. Med. Plants Res. harvest in
- Page 267 and 268:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 269 and 270:
2506 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 1.
- Page 271 and 272:
2508 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 4. S
- Page 273 and 274:
2510 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 3.
- Page 275 and 276:
2512 J. Med. Plants Res. over-expre
- Page 277 and 278:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 279 and 280:
2516 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. P
- Page 281 and 282:
2518 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. E
- Page 283 and 284:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 285 and 286:
2522 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 1.
- Page 287 and 288:
2524 J. Med. Plants Res. ACKNOWLEDG
- Page 289 and 290:
UPCOMING CONFERENCES 15th European
- Page 291:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc