Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals
Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals
Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2522 J. Med. Plants Res.<br />
Figure 1. The HPLC chromatogram of compound I. Column: Waters symmetry C18 column (150×4.6 mm); column temperature: 25°C: mobile phase: methanol:<br />
water from 70:30 to100:0, flow rate: 0.8 mL /min; detection wave length: 254 nm.<br />
selected as a solvent system, too small K values<br />
would result in poor peak resolution. It can be also<br />
seen that the K values of the HEMW (1:2:1:2, v/v)<br />
and HEMW (2:2:2:2, v/v) were too large, which<br />
lead to a long separation time and broad peaks.<br />
HEMW (2.3:2:2:1.3, v/v) was finally chosen for<br />
HSCCC separation as it gave a reasonable range<br />
of K values and a better resolution of target<br />
compounds. And it was used to isolate and purify<br />
two compounds from C. aculeatus Merr shown in<br />
Figure 3.<br />
In addition, other factors such as the revolution<br />
speed of the separation column and the flow rate<br />
of the mobile phase were also investigated. The<br />
result indicated that a low flow rate could produce<br />
a good separation, but long elution time was<br />
required and peaks became broader. Experiments<br />
result showed that when the flow rate was set at<br />
2.0 ml min -1 , revolution speed was 900 rpm,<br />
retention percentage of the stationary phase could<br />
reach 67% and good separation results could be<br />
achieved. Two compounds (I and II) were<br />
obtained in one-step elution less than 260 min<br />
(HSCCC chromatogram is shown in Figure 3) with<br />
the solvent system composed of n-hexane–<br />
ethylacetate–methanol-water (2.3:2:2:1.3, v/v). An<br />
amount of 2.5 mg of compound I and 13.0 mg of<br />
compound II were separated from 250 mg of the<br />
crude extract.<br />
HPLC analysis and structure identification of<br />
HSCCC peak fractions<br />
As shown in Figure 1 and 2, the HPLC<br />
chromatogram of each HSCCC peak fraction<br />
revealed that two compounds were purified from<br />
the crude extract. The purities of compound I and<br />
compound II were 95.0 and 97.1%, respectively.<br />
The structure identification of the HSCCC peak<br />
fractions was based on EI-MS, 1 H NMR and 13 C<br />
NMR. Data of compound I:<br />
Molecular formula C17H22O3. mp 171 to 175°C.<br />
HR-MS (EI) m/z: 274.1524 m/z (rel. int.%): 274<br />
(M + , 99), 259 (100), 217 (32), 203 (24), 191 (78),<br />
189 (94), 177(57), 163(23), 69 (51), 57(30),<br />
55(24); 1 H-NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz) δ:7.62 (1H,<br />
br.H-14), 6.83 (1H, br.H-11), 2.54-2.66 (2H,dd,H-<br />
6), 2.15(1H, d,J = 12.6Hz,H-5), 2.15(1H, m),<br />
1.71(H-a,d,J = 13.8Hz, H-1) ,1.64(H-b,m,H-1),<br />
1.48(H-a,d,J = 13.2Hz,H-2), 1.78(H-b,dd,J =<br />
13.2Hz, 4.2 Hz, H-2), 1.22 (H-a,m,H-3), 1.43 (Hb,m,H-3<br />
),1.14(3H, s, H-17), 0.94(3H, s, H-16),<br />
0.88(3H, s, H-15)。 13 C-NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz) δ:<br />
200.6 (C-7), 152.4 (C-13), 151.4 (C-12), 142.2(C-<br />
9), 123.7 (C-8), 113.6 (C-14), 110.1 (C-11), 49.8