06.04.2013 Views

Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals

Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals

Download Complete Issue - Academic Journals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2522 J. Med. Plants Res.<br />

Figure 1. The HPLC chromatogram of compound I. Column: Waters symmetry C18 column (150×4.6 mm); column temperature: 25°C: mobile phase: methanol:<br />

water from 70:30 to100:0, flow rate: 0.8 mL /min; detection wave length: 254 nm.<br />

selected as a solvent system, too small K values<br />

would result in poor peak resolution. It can be also<br />

seen that the K values of the HEMW (1:2:1:2, v/v)<br />

and HEMW (2:2:2:2, v/v) were too large, which<br />

lead to a long separation time and broad peaks.<br />

HEMW (2.3:2:2:1.3, v/v) was finally chosen for<br />

HSCCC separation as it gave a reasonable range<br />

of K values and a better resolution of target<br />

compounds. And it was used to isolate and purify<br />

two compounds from C. aculeatus Merr shown in<br />

Figure 3.<br />

In addition, other factors such as the revolution<br />

speed of the separation column and the flow rate<br />

of the mobile phase were also investigated. The<br />

result indicated that a low flow rate could produce<br />

a good separation, but long elution time was<br />

required and peaks became broader. Experiments<br />

result showed that when the flow rate was set at<br />

2.0 ml min -1 , revolution speed was 900 rpm,<br />

retention percentage of the stationary phase could<br />

reach 67% and good separation results could be<br />

achieved. Two compounds (I and II) were<br />

obtained in one-step elution less than 260 min<br />

(HSCCC chromatogram is shown in Figure 3) with<br />

the solvent system composed of n-hexane–<br />

ethylacetate–methanol-water (2.3:2:2:1.3, v/v). An<br />

amount of 2.5 mg of compound I and 13.0 mg of<br />

compound II were separated from 250 mg of the<br />

crude extract.<br />

HPLC analysis and structure identification of<br />

HSCCC peak fractions<br />

As shown in Figure 1 and 2, the HPLC<br />

chromatogram of each HSCCC peak fraction<br />

revealed that two compounds were purified from<br />

the crude extract. The purities of compound I and<br />

compound II were 95.0 and 97.1%, respectively.<br />

The structure identification of the HSCCC peak<br />

fractions was based on EI-MS, 1 H NMR and 13 C<br />

NMR. Data of compound I:<br />

Molecular formula C17H22O3. mp 171 to 175°C.<br />

HR-MS (EI) m/z: 274.1524 m/z (rel. int.%): 274<br />

(M + , 99), 259 (100), 217 (32), 203 (24), 191 (78),<br />

189 (94), 177(57), 163(23), 69 (51), 57(30),<br />

55(24); 1 H-NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz) δ:7.62 (1H,<br />

br.H-14), 6.83 (1H, br.H-11), 2.54-2.66 (2H,dd,H-<br />

6), 2.15(1H, d,J = 12.6Hz,H-5), 2.15(1H, m),<br />

1.71(H-a,d,J = 13.8Hz, H-1) ,1.64(H-b,m,H-1),<br />

1.48(H-a,d,J = 13.2Hz,H-2), 1.78(H-b,dd,J =<br />

13.2Hz, 4.2 Hz, H-2), 1.22 (H-a,m,H-3), 1.43 (Hb,m,H-3<br />

),1.14(3H, s, H-17), 0.94(3H, s, H-16),<br />

0.88(3H, s, H-15)。 13 C-NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz) δ:<br />

200.6 (C-7), 152.4 (C-13), 151.4 (C-12), 142.2(C-<br />

9), 123.7 (C-8), 113.6 (C-14), 110.1 (C-11), 49.8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!