Guardiola-Serrano F, Haendeler J, Lukosz M, Sturm K, Melchner H, Altschmied J (2008). Gene trapping identifies a putative tumor suppressor and a new inducer of cell migration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 376: 748-752. Hadkar V, Skidgel RA (2001). Carboxypeptidase D is up-regulated in raw 264.7 macrophages and stimulates nitric oxide synthesis by cells in arginine-free medium. Mol. Pharmacol., 59: 1324-1332. Hansel B, Bruckert E (2010). Lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Effect of the disease and of drug therapy. Ann. Endocrinol. (Paris), 71: 257-263. Hu Y, Ying H, Xu Y (2007). hF-LANa, a human homologue of Derlin family, regulating the expression of cancer-related genes promotes NIH3T3 cell transformation. Cancer Lett., 258: 171-180. Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009). Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc., 4: 44-57. Ismail AS, Behrendt CL, Hooper LV (2009). Reciprocal interactions between commensal bacteria and gamma delta intraepithelial lymphocytes during mucosal injury. J. Immunol., 182: 3047-3054. Jiang J, Wu C, Gao H, Song J, Li H (2010a). Effects of astragalus polysaccharides on immunologic function of erythrocyte in chickens infected with infectious bursa disease virus. Vaccine, 28: 5614-5616. Jiang JB, Qiu JD, Yang LH, He JP, Smith GW, Li HQ (2010b). Therapeutic effects of astragalus polysaccharides on inflammation and synovial apoptosis in rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis. Int. J Rheum. Dis., 13: 396-405. Jorgensen PM, Brundell E, Starborg M, Hoog C (1998). A subunit of the anaphase-promoting complex is a centromere-associated protein in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol., 18: 468-476. Kalinina E, Varlamov O, Fricker LD (2002). Analysis of the carboxypeptidase D cytoplasmic domain: Implications in intracellular trafficking. J. Cell. Biochem., 85: 101-111. Kalinina EV, Fricker LD (2003). Palmitoylation of carboxypeptidase D. Implications for intracellular trafficking. J. Biol. Chem., 278: 9244- 9249. Kelemen LE, Wang X, Fredericksen ZS, Pankratz VS, Pharoah PD, Ahmed S, Dunning AM, Easton, DF, Vierkant RA, Cerhan JR, Goode EL, Olson JE, Couch FJ (2009). Genetic variation in the chromosome 17q23 amplicon and breast cancer risk. Cancer. Epidemiol. Biomarkers. Prev., 18: 1864-1868. Lebre MC, Tak PP (2009). Dendritic cells in rheumatoid arthritis: Which subset should be used as a tool to induce tolerance? Hum. Immunol., 70: 321-324. Lee JP, Brauweiler A, Rudolph M, Hooper JE, Drabkin HA, Gemmill RM (2010). The TRC8 ubiquitin ligase is sterol regulated and interacts with lipid and protein biosynthetic pathways. Mol. Cancer Res., 8: 93- 106. Li XY (1991). Immunomodulating Chinese herbal medicines. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo. Cruz, 86(Suppl 2): 159-164. Lima EM, Leal MF, Burbano RR, Khayat AS, Assumpcao PP, Bello MJ, Rey JA, Smith MA, Casartelli C (2008). Methylation status of ANAPC1, CDKN2A and TP53 promoter genes in individuals with gastric cancer. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res., 41: 539-543. Liu QY, Yao YM, Zhang SW, Sheng ZY (2011). Astragalus polysaccharides regulate T cell-mediated immunity via CD11c(high)CD45RB(low) DCs in vitro. J. Ethnopharmacol., 136: 457-464. Luo Y, Zhao H, Liu Z, Ju D, He X, Xiao C, Zhong G, Chen S, Yang D, Chan AS, Lu A (2010). Comparison of the enteric mucosal immunomodulatory activity of combinations of Coptis chinensis Franch. Rhizomes and Evodia rutaecarpa (Juss.) Benth. Fruits in mice with dextran sulphate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis. Planta Med., 76: 766-772. McCracken VJ, Lorenz RG (2001). The gastrointestinal ecosystem: a precarious alliance among epithelium, immunity and microbiota. Cell. Microbiol., 3: 1-11. Milde-Langosch K, Janke S, Wagner I, Schroder C, Streichert T, Bamberger AM, Janicke F, Loning T (2008). Role of Fra-2 in breast cancer: influence on tumor cell invasion and motility. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 107: 337-347. Cheng et al. 2513 Mooney SM, Goel A, D'Assoro AB, Salisbury JL, Janknecht R (2010) Pleiotropic effects of p300-mediated acetylation on p68 and p72 RNA helicase. J. Biol. Chem., 285: 30443-30452. Mowat AM, MacKenzie S, Baca ME, Felstein MV, Parrott DM (1986). Functional characteristics of intraepithelial lymphocytes from mouse small intestine. II. In vivo and in vitro responses of intraepithelial lymphocytes to mitogenic and allogeneic stimuli. Immunology, 58: 627-634. Ohashi K, Osuga J, Tozawa R, Kitamine T, Yagyu H, Sekiya M, Tomita S, Okazaki H, Tamura Y, Yahagi N, Iizuka Y, Harada K, Gotoda T, Shimano H, Yamada N, Ishibashi S (2003). Early embryonic lethality caused by targeted disruption of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase gene. J. Biol. Chem., 278: 42936-42941. Pawar SA, Sarkar TR, Balamurugan K, Sharan S, Wang J, Zhang Y, Dowdy SF, Huang AM, Sterneck E (2010). C/EBP{delta} targets cyclin D1 for proteasome-mediated degradation via induction of CDC27/APC3 expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 107: 9210- 9215. Ryu DS, Baek GO, Kim EY, Kim KH, Lee DS (2010). Effects of polysaccharides derived from Orostachys japonicus on induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death in human colon cancer cells. B.M.B. Rep., 43: 750-755. Shima Y, Shima T, Chiba T, Irimura T, Pandolfi PP, Kitabayashi I (2008). PML activates transcription by protecting HIPK2 and p300 from SCFFbx3-mediated degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol., 28: 7126-7138. Starborg M, Brundell E, Gell K, Hoog C (1994). A novel murine gene encoding a 216-kDa protein is related to a mitotic checkpoint regulator previously identified in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 24133-24137. Sun QN, Najvar LK, Bocanegra R, Loebenberg D, Graybill JR (2002). In vivo activity of posaconazole against Mucor spp. in an immunosuppressed-mouse model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 46: 2310-2312. Tea M, Fogarty R, Brereton HM, Michael MZ, Van der Hoek MB, Tsykin A, Coster DJ, Williams KA (2009). Gene expression microarray analysis of early oxygen-induced retinopathy in the rat. J. Ocul. Biol. Dis. Infor., 2: 190-201. Toms TE, Symmons DP, Kitas GD (2010). Dyslipidaemia in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of inflammation, drugs, lifestyle and genetic factors. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol., 8: 301-326. Turpaev K, Glatigny A, Bignon J, Delacroix H, Drapier JC (2010). Variation in gene expression profiles of human monocytic U937 cells exposed to various fluxes of nitric oxide. Free Radic. Biol. Med., 48: 298-305. Wenink MH, Han W, Toes RE, Radstake TR (2009). Dendritic cells and their potential implication in pathology and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol., 188: 81-98. Xiao C, Zhao L, Liu Z, Lu C, Zhao N, Yang D, Chen S, Tang JC, Chan A, Lu AP (2009). The effect of triptolide on CD4+ and CD8+ cells in the Peyer's patch of DA rats with collagen induced arthritis. Nat. Prod. Res., 23: 1699-1706. Yanaba K, Bouaziz JD, Matsushita T, Magro CM, St Clair EW, Tedder TF (2008). B-lymphocyte contributions to human autoimmune disease. Immunol. Rev., 223: 284-299. Yin X, Chen L, Liu Y, Yang J, Ma C, Yao Z, Yang L, Wei L, Li M (2010). Enhancement of the innate immune response of bladder epithelial cells by Astragalus polysaccharides through upregulation of TLR4 expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 397: 232-238. Ying H, Yu Y, Xu Y (2001). Cloning and characterization of F-LANa, upregulated in human liver cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 286: 394-400. Zhang L, Fujita T, Wu G, Xiao X, Wan Y (2011). Phosphorylation of the anaphase-promoting complex/Cdc27 is involved in TGF-beta signaling. J. Biol. Chem., 286: 10041-10050. Zhao H, Luo Y, Lu C, Lin N, Xiao C, Guan S, Guo DA, Liu Z, Ju D, He X, Lu A (2010). Enteric mucosal immune response might trigger the immunomodulation activity of Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide in mice. Planta Med., 76: 223-227.
Journal of Medicinal Plants Research Vol. 6(12), pp. 2514-2519, 30 March, 2012 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/JMPR DOI: 10.5897/JMPR12.042 ISSN 1996-0875 ©2012 <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Journals</strong> Full Length Research Paper Palatability perception of herbal teas: Impact of extraction time and saccharose Ain Raal* and Vallo Matto Department of Pharmacy, University of Tartu, Nooruse 1, Tartu 50411, Estonia. Accepted 10 February, 2012 The herbal teas have been used as remedies for centuries, but they are believed to be a priori unpalatable. The palatability of 43 different herbal teas and the effect of the extraction time and a sweetener (saccharose) on the taste perception of 31 or 25 herbal teas respectively, were evaluated using the 5 point palatability scale. The palatability scores of the herbal teas varied to a great extent (from 1.03 to 4.64) but as a general trend the unpalatable teas were considered as distasteful by the majority of subjects and the scores given to the palatable teas were divergent. The prolongation of the extraction time from 10 to 45 min had only a very limited effect toward the unpalatableness that effect was even not found for all herbal teas. While the effect of the saccharose univocally improved the taste but magnitude of this phenomenon was also moderate. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the favorable palatability but not distastefulness of the herbal teas strongly depends on the taste perception of the subject, and the time of extraction or addition of saccharose have only a minor effect on the palatability score of herbal teas. Key words: Medicinal plants, herbal teas, palatability, extraction time, saccharose, organoleptic analyze. INTRODUCTION Perception of taste is an evolutionary preserved physiological mechanism to evaluate the food and drink quality (Yarmolinsky, 2009). There are numerous research works focused on the food taste and palatability, particularly in the context of food processing/preservation (van Boekel et al., 2010) or obesity issues (Yeomans, 2004). Contrary, far not so much attention has been paid on the gustatory aspects or sensations associated with the intake of nutritional supplies or remedies produced from natural sources. Orally administered medications derived from medicinal plants have been used for centuries to treat various diseases and ailments. Despite the fact that the modern pharmaceutical industry relies on chemical synthesis, the utilization of natural medicines is an increasing trend both in developed and source limited countries. For convenient daily administration, herbs of medicinal plants are frequently used in the form of teas, tisanes, decocts, or infusions However, the herbal teas are believed to be a priori unpalatable, while the *Corresponding author. E-mail: ain.raal@ut.ee. Tel.: +372 737 5281. Fax : +372 737 5289. sensations of astringency or bitterness may limit their use (Boon and Smith, 2004). The neural pathways of gustatory sensations are sufficiently determined (Jones et al., 2006), nevertheless, the perception of palatability of certain foods or drinks remains partially emotional. The present open study aimed to characterize the subjective sensory perception of palatability of various herbal teas and to evaluate the effect of extraction time or the use of the saccharose as a sweetener in the preference of herbal teas. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plant material and preparation of herbal teas All medicinal plants were collected by pharmacy students either from natural habitats or from special medicinal plant fields of Estonia. The plants were carefully cleaned on-spot and marked. In laboratory conditions, the plants were identified again using the taxonomic guide (Kukk and Kull, 2005), divided into organs and dried in a dark room at room temperature (22 ± 2ºC) for ten days. The dried herbs were labeled, packaged in a paper-bag, and stored at ambient temperature (22 ± 2°C) in a dark and dry stora ge room until tested. The voucher specimens of the tested plants are stored at the Department of Pharmacy, University of Tartu, Estonia.
- Page 1 and 2:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 3 and 4:
Editors Prof. Akah Peter Achunike E
- Page 5 and 6:
Electronic submission of manuscript
- Page 7 and 8:
Fees and Charges: Authors are requi
- Page 9 and 10:
Table of Contents: Volume 6 Number
- Page 11 and 12:
Table of Contents: Volume 6 Number
- Page 13 and 14:
Table of Contents: Volume 6 Number
- Page 15 and 16:
Figure 1. Chuanxiong Rhizoma (http:
- Page 17 and 18:
Table 1. Identification of main pea
- Page 19 and 20:
Table 3. Pharmacokinetic parameters
- Page 21 and 22:
active component study, many invest
- Page 23 and 24:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 25 and 26:
and 1185 kg ha -1 in the first site
- Page 27 and 28:
Table 1. Recommendation for use fer
- Page 29 and 30:
Sadanandan AK, Hamza S (1996c). Stu
- Page 31 and 32:
and it has been traced to South Ame
- Page 33 and 34:
Table 3. Results of phytochemical a
- Page 35 and 36:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 37 and 38:
(a) (b) (c) Figure 1. (a) Normal ce
- Page 39 and 40:
emedies in the south of Brazil. J.
- Page 41 and 42:
known fatty acids and terpenoids we
- Page 43 and 44:
Table 1. Renal function tests of ra
- Page 45 and 46:
Al-Radahe et al. 2271 Figure 3.nnnn
- Page 47 and 48:
namely disruption of the vascular e
- Page 49 and 50:
Zayachkivska OS, Konturek SJ, Drozd
- Page 51 and 52:
β-carotene were purchased from Sig
- Page 53 and 54:
Figure 1. Effect of ethanol concent
- Page 55 and 56:
Table 3. Climatic and soil factors
- Page 57 and 58:
content of polysaccharides. Phospha
- Page 59 and 60:
Serge et al. 2285 Table 1. Relative
- Page 61 and 62:
Percentage inhibition % of inhibiti
- Page 63 and 64:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 65 and 66:
Table 1. Result of phytochemical sc
- Page 67 and 68:
Table 3. Result of thin layer chrom
- Page 69 and 70:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 71 and 72:
Table 2. MIC of a compound 1 from c
- Page 73 and 74:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 75 and 76:
Zirihi et al. 2301 Figure 2. Termin
- Page 77 and 78:
Figure 5. T. catappa Linn. (Combret
- Page 79 and 80:
Figure 8. A. fumigatus: Aspect of c
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure 12. Sensitivity of A. fumiga
- Page 83 and 84:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 85 and 86:
Noormi et al. 2311 Table 1. Callus
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 2. Contd. NoC=No callus. 4.0
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 2. Contd. at 2.0 mg/L yellow
- Page 91 and 92:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 1. Biochemical parameters in
- Page 95 and 96:
Figure 3. Bcl-xL reactions in inter
- Page 97 and 98:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would l
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 1. The first page of the boo
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 3. The most widely included
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 4. Lithographic print “St.
- Page 105 and 106:
Table 1. List of plants included in
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 1. Contd. Nedelcheva 2333 Cin
- Page 109 and 110:
Table 1. Contd. Nedelcheva 2335 Rhe
- Page 111 and 112:
14 7 1 15 1 35 17 16 Imported plant
- Page 113 and 114:
Academy of Science Publishing House
- Page 115 and 116:
et al., 1996; van Wyk and Gericke,
- Page 117 and 118:
DPPH inhibition (%) DPPH % inhibiti
- Page 119 and 120:
% Mortality Concentration (µg/ml)
- Page 121 and 122:
information on plants used for the
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 1. Levels of independent vari
- Page 125 and 126:
Arbutin (mg/g) Co-solvent Figure 1.
- Page 127 and 128:
Arbutin (mg/g) Co-solvent Figure 3.
- Page 129 and 130:
Arbutin (mg/g) Extraction pressure
- Page 131 and 132:
Table 3. Arbuitn content of Asian p
- Page 133 and 134:
Arbutin (mg/g) Co-solvent Figure 8.
- Page 135 and 136:
Arbutin (mg/g) Extraction pressure
- Page 137 and 138:
Arbutin (mg/g) Extraction temperatu
- Page 139 and 140:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 141 and 142:
Table 1. Chemical composition of es
- Page 143 and 144:
Darjazi 2369 Table 2. Statistical a
- Page 145 and 146:
Table 3. Correlation matrix (number
- Page 147 and 148:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 149 and 150:
Table 1. Precision test. extraction
- Page 151 and 152:
Figure 2. Effect of different alcoh
- Page 153 and 154:
Table 6. Results of ANOVA. Nie et a
- Page 155 and 156:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 157 and 158:
Table 2. Plant data and MIC values
- Page 159 and 160:
exhibiting the polar extracts of P.
- Page 161 and 162:
Table 3. Contd. AcOEt ++ ++ ++ - Me
- Page 163 and 164:
Figure 1. Map of Ladakh region of I
- Page 165 and 166:
Warghat et al. 2391 Table 3. Summar
- Page 167 and 168:
Table 5. Inter-Population genetic i
- Page 169 and 170:
Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM
- Page 171 and 172:
ice residue is an ideal raw materia
- Page 173 and 174:
DPPH• scavenging ratio(%) OD valu
- Page 175 and 176:
scavenging effect on free radical a
- Page 177 and 178:
our new CL system. Fenton reaction
- Page 179 and 180:
1 2 Time (s) Figure 2. Kinetic curv
- Page 181 and 182:
Wong et al., 2006). It can be seen
- Page 183 and 184:
Pan YM, Liang Y, Wang HS, Liang M (
- Page 185 and 186:
2422 J. Med. Plants Res. close cano
- Page 187 and 188:
2424 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. M
- Page 189 and 190:
2426 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. C
- Page 191 and 192:
2428 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. C
- Page 193 and 194:
2430 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. C
- Page 195 and 196:
2432 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 2. D
- Page 197 and 198:
2434 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 6. T
- Page 199 and 200:
2436 J. Med. Plants Res. budget dur
- Page 201 and 202:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 203 and 204:
2440 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. R
- Page 205 and 206:
2442 J. Med. Plants Res. Stability
- Page 207 and 208:
2444 J. Med. Plants Res. production
- Page 209 and 210:
2446 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 2.
- Page 211 and 212:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 213 and 214:
2450 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 2. A
- Page 215 and 216:
2452 J. Med. Plants Res. Ghasemi Pi
- Page 217 and 218:
2454 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. I
- Page 219 and 220:
2456 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. M
- Page 221 and 222:
Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 223 and 224:
2460 J. Med. Plants Res. Department
- Page 225 and 226: 2462 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. E
- Page 227 and 228: 2464 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 6. E
- Page 229 and 230: 2466 J. Med. Plants Res. AOAC (2000
- Page 231 and 232: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 233 and 234: 2470 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. F
- Page 235 and 236: 2472 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. S
- Page 237 and 238: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 239 and 240: 2476 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 1.
- Page 241 and 242: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 243 and 244: 2480 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. W
- Page 245 and 246: 2482 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 2. C
- Page 247 and 248: 2484 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. C
- Page 249 and 250: 2486 J. Med. Plants Res. components
- Page 251 and 252: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 253 and 254: 2490 J. Med. Plants Res. Inhibition
- Page 255 and 256: 2492 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 3.
- Page 257 and 258: 2494 J. Med. Plants Res. can increa
- Page 259 and 260: 2496 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 2. S
- Page 261 and 262: 2498 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 4. S
- Page 263 and 264: 2500 J. Med. Plants Res. Flowering
- Page 265 and 266: 2502 J. Med. Plants Res. harvest in
- Page 267 and 268: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 269 and 270: 2506 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 1.
- Page 271 and 272: 2508 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 4. S
- Page 273 and 274: 2510 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 3.
- Page 275: 2512 J. Med. Plants Res. over-expre
- Page 279 and 280: 2516 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 1. P
- Page 281 and 282: 2518 J. Med. Plants Res. Table 3. E
- Page 283 and 284: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc
- Page 285 and 286: 2522 J. Med. Plants Res. Figure 1.
- Page 287 and 288: 2524 J. Med. Plants Res. ACKNOWLEDG
- Page 289 and 290: UPCOMING CONFERENCES 15th European
- Page 291: Journal of Medicinal Plants Researc