24.04.2013 Views

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

importantly, he speaks by means of images. He accomplishes this by thinking the two sides of a<br />

narrative—its literal and figural meanings—as necessarily coterminous. In his interpretation, the<br />

passage of time is not a personified oral speech which bears with it the will of its author but the<br />

still look of an image which awaits a future interpretation in time, which awaits the allowance of<br />

Arioch to bring the prophet before the king, of Nebuchadnezzar to give time for Daniel to dream,<br />

and for God to give Nebuchadnezzar’s vision of time to him in a dream. In fact, the linkage of<br />

temporal deferral and written authority is seen in the very structure of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream<br />

from this point on which is literally interpreted as a statue of many metals that means to<br />

allegorize the passage of history (a still depiction of the passage of time) and is figurally<br />

represented by purely visual Hebrew characters on the page without direct Hebrew ideas (an<br />

arrest of “sermo” ‘speech’ through an image). 170<br />

As a prophecy, Daniel’s literal representation of time as an image (a statue made up of<br />

different metals which represent a prophecy of the growth of the empires of the world and their<br />

end) manages to not monopolize the passage of time through speech but to arrest it in a pictorial<br />

stillness. As a way of writing, Daniel’s figurative embodiment of time through an image (a<br />

written story about a dream contained in the visual play of hollow Hebrew characters) arrests<br />

time while still inhabiting it. As a result, the narrative makes the reader focus not on its ability to<br />

reflect a stable meaning but in its play of resemblances.<br />

In Daniel, biblical writing is therefore the writing of the figural and the literal through<br />

time. Anticipating Jacques Derrida’s idea of écriture, Jerome’s portrayal of the events in Daniel<br />

simultaneously turns writing into the stillness of time and movement of meaning, a deferral and<br />

170 It is important that Hebrew characters continue to represent Aramaic speech up until the last vision which Daniel<br />

saw under the rule of Belshazzar, the king whose rule ended by a disembodied hand writing a strange, unknown<br />

language on the wall.<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!