24.04.2013 Views

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tamen laicus ante aliquam constitutionem numquam habuit potestatem in laicos, sed sola<br />

usurpatione... imperium dependet a potestate papae, qui habet utrumque gladium” ‘although [the<br />

Emperor] is secular before any constitution by right, he has no power over secular men, but only<br />

usurpation. Command depends from the power of the Pope, who holds both swords.’ 90 Repeating<br />

Augustine’s claim that, outside of divine justice, sovereignty amounts only “latrocinia”<br />

‘robbery,’ Vladimiri argues—almost foreshadowing Nietzsche’s critique of law—that, from the<br />

vantage point of history, “right” is merely an institutionalized alibi of centuries of oppression and<br />

conquest. 91 Therefore, rightful authority is only possible outside a temporal perspective from an<br />

absolute viewpoint which would bind Christians and infidels, “boves et oves” ‘cows and sheep,’<br />

as immediate reflections of one universal idea.<br />

Vladimiri thus uses a very old but effective argument to undermine his opponents: the<br />

charge that human institutions are mere representations which dissemble “ideal” truth. This<br />

indictment against basing a theory of justice from pure representation is the heart of his formal<br />

accusation against the Teutonic Order delivered before the Council of Constance. Its most<br />

explicit articulation is found in the Incipit of his polemical Articuli Contra Cruciferos in Prussia:<br />

In nomine Domini nostri Iesu Christi. Amen. Quia praesens Generale Constantiense Concilium<br />

propter tria principaliter convocatum exsistit ac etiam in Spiritu Sancto congregatum: primo, ut<br />

schisma pestiferum tollatur ab Ecclesia; secundo, ut haereses exstirpentur; tertio, pro reformatione<br />

Ecclesiae facienda tam in capite quam in membris, duobus aliis non omissis. Quantum ad<br />

secundum istorum docet Salvator noster procedere (in Evangelio Matthaei, vii c.) dicens: Attendite<br />

a falsis prophetis, qui veniunt ad vos in vestimentis ovium, intrinsecus autum sunt lupi rapaces. Et<br />

subdit: a fructibus eorum cognoscetis eos; et, post pauca, non potest …arba mala bonos fructus<br />

facere, etc. Igitur de fructibus haeresis Prussianae—quae non minor videtur, immo multo maior,<br />

horribilior, deteriror et damnabilior, quam Wicklephistarum et Hussonistarum, videlicet Fratum,<br />

qui Fratres Hospitalis Sanctae Mariae de domo Teutonicorum Ierosolimitani se appelant, alias de<br />

Prussia ponuntur articuli infrascripti.<br />

In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, Amen. Because the present General Council of Constance<br />

exists principally convoked and even congregated in the Holy Ghost for three things: first, so that<br />

the schisms of pestilences be destroyed from the church; second, so that the heretics be extirpated;<br />

third, for the acting reformation of the Church as much in the head as in the members, with the<br />

90 Belch 2.875.<br />

91 Ibid. and “Remotaque iustitia quia sunt regna nisi magna latrocinia?” ‘And with justice removed, what are<br />

kingdoms if not great dens of robbers?’ (Augustine “De civitate” Book 4. Chapter 4.113).<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!