24.04.2013 Views

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

WRITING AUTHORITY IN LATE MEDIEVAL ... - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

meaning to his personal experiences; it is only a means to change its temporality in the eyes of<br />

the reader and so to assure its truth. Ayala still thinks of the events in history as worthy to be<br />

written regardless of their intrinsic moral worth. In tying the “here and now” of his experiences<br />

to an atemporal Good, Ayala attempts to prevent future generations from reading his own<br />

chronicles as subjective. Similitude to universal moral principles, therefore, literally keeps a<br />

“estoria” “guardada” ‘kept and guarded,’ keeping it from death and guarding it from<br />

misinterpretation by future readers.<br />

The goal of a true “estoria” is to universalize events without diluting the specificity of<br />

their past—to keep a writer’s temporal experiences intact while still guaranteeing that such<br />

experiences would be read as objective by the future. As a result, Ayala formulates the problem<br />

of historical truth decidedly as a readerly and not writerly issue. It is a reader’s changing pathos<br />

across time—his changing feeling on the objectivity of what he read—that must be prevented by<br />

linking a writer’s experiences to objective principles, and it is a reader’s ability to forget that<br />

must be remedied through the craft of writing. Without readers, history may not be true.<br />

The first hint that Guzmán takes Ayala’s theory of disciplining readership to maintain<br />

historical truth at face value comes in Generaciones y Semblanzas when he openly writes<br />

biographies from “fabulae”—narrative traditions that have been handed down without an actual<br />

eye-witness—or as Guzmán labels them, “relatos” ‘re-sayings.’ 245 Appropriately enough,<br />

Generaciones most explicitly makes use of “relatos” when describing the veridical basis for its<br />

portrait of Ayala:<br />

Don Pero Lopez de Ayala, chançiller mayor de Castilla, fue un cauallero de grant linaje…<br />

Algunos del linaje de Ayala dizen que uienen de un infante de Aragon a quien el rey de Castilla<br />

dio el señorio de Ayala, e yo ansi lo falle escrito por don Ferrant Perez de Ayala, padre deste don<br />

245 In fact, one of the requirements that Guzmán places on a proper historian is the absence from the immediate<br />

events so that true chroniclers do not write about the kings under which they serve to avoid bias. The work of the<br />

historian, then, would always be that of the compilator of sayings and not the immediate witness of events<br />

(Generaciones 5-6).<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!